• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

2002, 2006월드컵 예선 한국팀 패스분석에 의한 경기력 비교 (A Comparison of Path analysis 2002 and 2006 World Cup qualifying Korea team)

13 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.04 최종저작일 2009.05
13P 미리보기
2002, 2006월드컵 예선 한국팀 패스분석에 의한 경기력 비교
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국체육과학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국체육과학회지 / 18권 / 2호 / 1431 ~ 1443페이지
    · 저자명 : 김성호, 김규완

    초록

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the 2002,2006 World Cup which Korea’s national team impact on what are the factors, path analysis are efficient, some factors was participated in 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of that each 3 games total 6 games of Korea's National Team preliminary. The frequency of the pass measured forward pass, cross pass, back pass and short pass, middle pass, long pass to offence and defence area to section of Path analysis. To determine whether we have played a VHS tapes each frame for Firstly the international Matches 110x75,which divide the ground by 16 and than bisect 8 of offence area. Secondly divide the direction of the pass by forward pass 150, back pass 150, left and right crossing each 30 and the distance of the pass by short pass (15m), middle pass (16m~), long pass (31m~) In the effect is recorded to the program of Microsoft office power point 2007. The results are shown in a table. The first record is by area groups that put a mark. The second is about marks and by area groups record is by area groups recorded the frequency of the pass. The third it find the total of result for 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of FIFA World Cup. The analysis factors measured by SPSS (ver12.0) each types of forward pass, crossing, back pass and the distance of the pass as short pass, middle pass, long pass for each section was analyzed by frequency of offence area and defence area. Based on this analysis, each type of pass and independent t- test measured for the difference between success and failure of each type of distance. And dependent t-test was analyzed for each section of forward, crossing, back of pass and pass of distance as short pass,
    middle pass, long pass of 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup as well. Theory level is that all statistics measured a = .05.
    The results were as follows;
    1. The success type of pass and failure was very high frequency in defence area success of forward pass than offence area.
    2. Back pass and forward pass are same as the frequency of use in the offence area. And back pass is in the defence area as well.
    3. In defence area of middle pass achieved success showed the many frequency that but as low frequency of failure, appeared highly successful.
    4. In overall type of each pass relatively frequency of success offence and defence was significantly high all of them then showed low frequency of failure. Also in pass results from each distance that short pass was high frequency of success while it was significantly low frequency of failure.

    영어초록

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the 2002,2006 World Cup which Korea’s national team impact on what are the factors, path analysis are efficient, some factors was participated in 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of that each 3 games total 6 games of Korea's National Team preliminary. The frequency of the pass measured forward pass, cross pass, back pass and short pass, middle pass, long pass to offence and defence area to section of Path analysis. To determine whether we have played a VHS tapes each frame for Firstly the international Matches 110x75,which divide the ground by 16 and than bisect 8 of offence area. Secondly divide the direction of the pass by forward pass 150, back pass 150, left and right crossing each 30 and the distance of the pass by short pass (15m), middle pass (16m~), long pass (31m~) In the effect is recorded to the program of Microsoft office power point 2007. The results are shown in a table. The first record is by area groups that put a mark. The second is about marks and by area groups record is by area groups recorded the frequency of the pass. The third it find the total of result for 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup of FIFA World Cup. The analysis factors measured by SPSS (ver12.0) each types of forward pass, crossing, back pass and the distance of the pass as short pass, middle pass, long pass for each section was analyzed by frequency of offence area and defence area. Based on this analysis, each type of pass and independent t- test measured for the difference between success and failure of each type of distance. And dependent t-test was analyzed for each section of forward, crossing, back of pass and pass of distance as short pass,
    middle pass, long pass of 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup and 2006 Germany World Cup as well. Theory level is that all statistics measured a = .05.
    The results were as follows;
    1. The success type of pass and failure was very high frequency in defence area success of forward pass than offence area.
    2. Back pass and forward pass are same as the frequency of use in the offence area. And back pass is in the defence area as well.
    3. In defence area of middle pass achieved success showed the many frequency that but as low frequency of failure, appeared highly successful.
    4. In overall type of each pass relatively frequency of success offence and defence was significantly high all of them then showed low frequency of failure. Also in pass results from each distance that short pass was high frequency of success while it was significantly low frequency of failure.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“한국체육과학회지”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 02월 13일 금요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
10:44 오전