PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

통상임금에 관한 법적 문제점과 개선방안 (Legal issues governing the ordinary wage and its resolution)

한국학술지에서 제공하는 국내 최고 수준의 학술 데이터베이스를 통해 다양한 논문과 학술지 정보를 만나보세요.
32 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.02.11 최종저작일 2013.08
32P 미리보기
통상임금에 관한 법적 문제점과 개선방안
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국비교노동법학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 노동법논총 / 28권 / 283 ~ 314페이지
    · 저자명 : 김희성

    초록

    Article 2, paragraph 1, item 5 of the Korean Labor Standard Act defines the definition of the wage, and item 6 of the same act describes the average wage. In addition, the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standard Act stipulates the ordinary wage so as to delineate the definition of the average wage and the ordinary wage to set a clear legal standard for the legal decision-makings. However such direct stipulation of ordinary wage in the enforcement decree without commission from the mother law - the Korean Labor Standard Act, encompass the problem in its legal scheme.
    The article 6, paragraph 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standard Act describes the meaning of ordinary wage as, “hourly wage, daily wage, weekly wage, monthly wage, or contract amount to be paid to a worker for a specifically agreed work or entire works on a regular and flat basis.” The definition in the decree act has been so far the legal basis for the Supreme Court’s decision making regarding the ordinary wages until recently. However the latest ruling of the Supreme Court shows a precisely changed position. Such disparity between court rulings lacking the full court decision and the estrangement from the administrative interpretations could create ripple in setting the wage allowances in work places, and is generating the disputable situations in between the labor and management sides. Also in the medical insurance union case in 1996, by taking the discord position from the previous rulings by announcing “Even in the case when the wage is paid to the worker passing the period of a month, if it is paid regularly and flat, than it is included in the ordinary wage”, violated the lawful precedent changing procedure.(Article 7 of the Court Organization Act _unanimous decision by the Supreme Court) This in a definite infringe of the procedural requirement considering the importance of the legal principles governing the ordinary wage. It seems that the Supreme Court discounted the meaning of the ordinary wage in its decision-making and did not anticipate the consequential disputes per se. Nonetheless if it had foreseen by the court in any means, it will not be excused from the criticism of intentional avoidance. Nevertheless, viewing the importance of the ordinary wages, the Supreme Court should make its proper full court decision by a clear unanimous procedure based on a genuine review.
    Although it seems reasonable from its legislative purpose to insert the definition clause of the ordinary wage which now is in the article 6 of the enforcement act to the article 2 of the labor standard act, and to commission the practical judgement standard and its methods to the regulations of enforcement act, it would be yet far to take place unless the grand agreement between the labor and employer sides proceed in advance. As now seen from the extraordinary session of the National Assembly last June, the administrative interpretation of the ordinary wage should be regarded in its cogent decision-making in the Constitutional Court.

    영어초록

    Article 2, paragraph 1, item 5 of the Korean Labor Standard Act defines the definition of the wage, and item 6 of the same act describes the average wage. In addition, the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standard Act stipulates the ordinary wage so as to delineate the definition of the average wage and the ordinary wage to set a clear legal standard for the legal decision-makings. However such direct stipulation of ordinary wage in the enforcement decree without commission from the mother law - the Korean Labor Standard Act, encompass the problem in its legal scheme.
    The article 6, paragraph 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standard Act describes the meaning of ordinary wage as, “hourly wage, daily wage, weekly wage, monthly wage, or contract amount to be paid to a worker for a specifically agreed work or entire works on a regular and flat basis.” The definition in the decree act has been so far the legal basis for the Supreme Court’s decision making regarding the ordinary wages until recently. However the latest ruling of the Supreme Court shows a precisely changed position. Such disparity between court rulings lacking the full court decision and the estrangement from the administrative interpretations could create ripple in setting the wage allowances in work places, and is generating the disputable situations in between the labor and management sides. Also in the medical insurance union case in 1996, by taking the discord position from the previous rulings by announcing “Even in the case when the wage is paid to the worker passing the period of a month, if it is paid regularly and flat, than it is included in the ordinary wage”, violated the lawful precedent changing procedure.(Article 7 of the Court Organization Act _unanimous decision by the Supreme Court) This in a definite infringe of the procedural requirement considering the importance of the legal principles governing the ordinary wage. It seems that the Supreme Court discounted the meaning of the ordinary wage in its decision-making and did not anticipate the consequential disputes per se. Nonetheless if it had foreseen by the court in any means, it will not be excused from the criticism of intentional avoidance. Nevertheless, viewing the importance of the ordinary wages, the Supreme Court should make its proper full court decision by a clear unanimous procedure based on a genuine review.
    Although it seems reasonable from its legislative purpose to insert the definition clause of the ordinary wage which now is in the article 6 of the enforcement act to the article 2 of the labor standard act, and to commission the practical judgement standard and its methods to the regulations of enforcement act, it would be yet far to take place unless the grand agreement between the labor and employer sides proceed in advance. As now seen from the extraordinary session of the National Assembly last June, the administrative interpretation of the ordinary wage should be regarded in its cogent decision-making in the Constitutional Court.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“노동법논총”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

찾으시던 자료가 아닌가요?

지금 보는 자료와 연관되어 있어요!
왼쪽 화살표
오른쪽 화살표
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 08월 05일 화요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
12:46 오후