신발견 朴昌和의 花郞世紀 殘本과 ‘鄕歌’ 一首

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 동국사학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 동국사학 / 43권
ㆍ저자명 : 박남수

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 南堂 朴昌和의 行狀
Ⅲ. 새로 발견한 花郞世紀 殘本의 내용 구성
Ⅳ. 花郞世紀 殘本과 기발견 花郞世紀 두 본과의 관계
Ⅴ. 朴昌和의 碧海上白波歌와 波浪歌
Ⅵ. 맺음말

한국어 초록

1989년과 1995년에 발견된 花郞世紀 진위를 둘러싼 논쟁은 이제 새로운 국면으로 들어서 있는 듯하다. 두 차례에 걸친 발견 당시에는 진위에 대한 공방전이 치열하게 전개되었다면, 거의 20년이 다 되어 가는 현 시점에서는 僞書로 보는 논자들은 거의 이를 거들떠보지도 않는 반면, 이를 金大問 花郞世記 의 필사본으로 보는 연구자들은 花郞世紀 의 내용을 사료로써 본격적으로 활용하고 있는 양상을 보이고 있다.

영어 초록

Hwarangsegi (花郞世紀) transcribed by Park, Chang-wha was found twice in
1989 and 1995. So the Korean ancient history researchers have repeated the
controversy about its genuineness for 18 years. National Institute of Korean
History(國史編纂委員會) collected the manuscripts left by Mr. Park Chang-wha
en bloc in 2001. Arranging his posthumous manuscripts, I found the manuscripts
of Hwarangsegi which was presumed to be a different version(殘本) discriminated
from that of 1995 and another Hyangga(鄕歌) included in the manuscripts.
I ascertained the facts as follows by examining those material. First, the new
version of Hwarangsegi found in this time falls under a sequel to 1989ㆍ1995
version of the already found Hwarangsegi in the contents.
Second, the new version is come to the conclusion that it’s the original
version(底本) of 1989ㆍ1995 version in many ways, for example, the choice of
terms and the O2description about the rebellion of Kim Heum-dol(金欽突),
Boryong(?龍)’s lineage and his marital relations, the origins of Taoist hermit
group with supernatural powers(仙徒) and sect of Yeon(燕門). Third, the different
version of Hwarangsegi is what Mr. Park wrote in 1930. After he arranged the description of both Samguksagi and Samgungnyusa in a chronological order, he made
the ring to connect between the related material logically. Furthermore, it was
a historical novel to creat fictitious characters and fanciful stories whenever it was
needed. Especially, He corrected the contents of the newly found Hwarangsegi since
he had fixed Okigong(吳起公) as the father of Kim, Dae-mun(金大問). And
Hwarangsegi found in 1995 became a forged book by adopting the modified
contents. Contrary to the controversy about its genuineness until now, moreover,
Mr. Park obviously said that he had never seen Hwarangsegi in his other works
himself.

참고 자료

없음