화용론(PRAGMATICS)

소개

화용론에 대한 자료 정리입니다. 화용론은 의미론과 통사론과는 달리 보는 이의 관점에 따라서 수없이 많은 이론이 만들어 질 수 있는 상황이라서 완전하게 정리는 되지 못한것 같습니다. 하지만 기본적인 내용에 대해서 충실하게 정리하였으며 기본서의 애매한 어휘를 철저하게 분리 정리하였습니다. 기본적으로 LINGUISTICS FOR NON-LINGUISTS라는 책의 내용을 정리 분석하였는데 뒤에 있는 EXERCISE나 SUPPLEMENTARY EXERCISE에서 PRAGMATIC 부분에서 모르는 부분이 있다면 저에게 멜 주세용. [e-mail] 입니다.

목차

1. IMPLICATURE
2. COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE(MAXIM OF QUANTITY, QUALITY, RELATION, MANNER)
3. SPEECH ACT(LOCUTIONARY ACT, ILLOCUTIONARY ACT, PERLOCUTIONARY ACT)
4. CLASSIFICATION OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS(REPRESENTATIVE, DECLARATION, EXPRESSIVE, COMMISSIVE, QUESTION, DIRECTIVE)
5. PERFORMATIVE VERB VS NONPERFORMATIVE VERB
6. EXPLICIT AND NONEXPLICIT PERFORMATIVES
7. DIRECTIVE VS INDIRECT ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS
8. EXPRESSED VS IMPLIED LOCUTIONARY ACTS
9. LITERAL VS NONLITERAL LOCUTIIONARY ACTS

본문내용

Pragmatics
1. Implicature : An utterance can imply a proposition that is not part of utterance and that does not follow as a necessary consequence of the utterance and that does not follow as a necessary consequence of the utterance.
ex) Consider the following example,
Jerry says to his wife, "Uncle Jim coming over for dinner tonight" and his wife Julia respond "Then I guess I`d better hide the liquor". This utterance raise the implicature, the listener will translate that uncle Jim has drinking problem.

There are 4 ways to make an implicature to use Grice`s `Conversational Maxim`. This is also called that Cooperative Principle. 4 components can be flouted by speaker who want to show his or her intended meaning. That is to say, when maxim in violated, we draw an inferance. There exists an implicature. Let`s have check each of the following 4 conversational maxims.

참고자료

· 없음