The Comparison of Analytic and Holistic Scoring

소개

The Comparison of Analytic and Holistic Scoring -> 전부 영어

목차

Contents

Abstract

Ⅰ. Introduction

Ⅱ. Literature of Review
2.1 The History of Writing Assessment
2.2 Two Basic Kinds of Writing Assessment : Analytic and Holistic Scoring

Ⅲ. Research Questions

Ⅳ. Method
4.1 Subjects
4.2 Materials
4.3 Procedures
4.4 Analyses

Ⅴ. Results

Ⅵ. Discussion /Conclusion

Reference

Appendix



Tables

Table 1. The summary of analytic and holistic scoring
Table 2. A comparison of holistic and analytic scales in terms of test usefulness
Table 3. Scores of writing samples
Table 4. Average scores of analytic and holistic scoring
Table 5. The interrater reliability of analytic and holistic scoring
Table 6. The result of using paired-T test in the analysis of Rater 1`s analytic and holistic scoring
Table 7. The result of using paired-T test in the analysis of Rater 2`s analytic and holistic scoring
Table 8. The result of using paired-T test in the analysis of Rater 3`s analytic and holistic scoring
Table 9. The result of using Friedman Test
Appendixes

Appendix 1. Essay question
Appendix 2. Analytic scoring used
Appendix 3. Holistic scoring used
Appendix 4. Interview questions about the scoring

본문내용

Ⅰ. Introduction

In Korea, the entrance to university is generally determined mainly by CSAT(College Scholastic Aptitude Test). However, the examination consisting of MCQ(multiple choice question) has been criticized on the ground that it lacks the validity, which especially applies to the English writing test. In this trend, English essay has been considered as one of the alternatives against that. Although it is not adopted in the present university entrance system, an issue of using English essay for choosing a student will be kept being raised in Korea. In fact, English essay has already been made use of in the process of performance assessment of middle and high school. In this regard, it would be desirable to think of how valid English essay is and what is the most effective way to put it into practice in classroom.
Making a good use of writing an essay in English is closely related to scoring method, which is well shown in the history of writing being made up of three stages like objective testing, holistic scoring and portfolio assessment. That is to say, the Korean situation and the history of testing writing can be said to show the scoring of writing has been one of the most controversial subjects with the probability that one type plays a positive or negative role in developing students` ability to write.

참고자료

· 박태현. (2005). The Place of Analytic and Holistic Scorings in EFL Writing Classes. 영미어문학. 75, 213-227.
· 지은림. (2000). 논술형 수행평가를 위한 채점방법들의 비교. 경희대학교 교육문제 연구소 논문집. 16, 235-246.
· 이호. (2005). 영작문 평가 상황에서 학생들의 평가과정에 대한 연구. 영어교육연 구. 17(3), 215-234.
· Robert L. Johnson, James Penny, Belita Gordon. (2000). The Relation Between Score Resolution Methods and Interrater Reliability : An Empirical Study of an Analytic Scoring Rubric. Applied Measurement in Education. 13(2), 121-138.
· Stephen P. Klein, et al. (1998). Analytic Versus Holistic Scoring of Science Performance Tasks. Applied Measurement in Education. 11(2), 121-137.
· Yuji Nakamura. (2002). A comparison of holistic and analytic scoring methods in the assessment of writing. Retrieved December 8 , 2006. from Tokyo Keizai University http://www.jalt.org/pansig/2004/HTML/Nakamura.htm Nancy Nesbit Vacc. (1989). Writing Evaluation : Examining Four Teachers` Holistic and Analytic Scores. Retrieved December 8, 2006. from http://links.jstor.org
· 심재홍. (1994. 7). 논술시험 출제와 평가. 우리교육. 54-57.
· Liz Hamp-Lyons. (2002). The scope of writing assessment. Assessing Writing. 8, 5-16.
· Lyle F. Bachman. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
· Lyle F. Bachman, & Adrian S. Palmer. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
· 이완기. (2003). 영어평가방법론. 서울: 문진미디어.
· Brown H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principle. (2nd Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
· Brown H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (4th Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
· Jack C. Richards, & Willy A. Renandya. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching : An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press
· Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
· Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher`s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.