[Multidisciplinary Project Final Report / TU Delft] Feasibility study on Submerged Floating Crossing (Tunnel)

목차

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 E39 FERRY-FREE PROJECT
1.3 OBJECTIVE
1.4 MAIN DEFINITION
1.4.1 SUBMERGED FLOATING CROSSING (SFC)
1.4.2 FAILURE
1.5 STUDY STRUCTURE

2. RISK ANALYSIS
2.1 RISK PERCEPTION
2.2 RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS
2.2.1 PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS (PHA)
2.2.2 FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA)
2.2.3 EVENT TREE ANALYSIS (ETA)
2.3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
2.3.1 HAZARDOUS EVENT FROM PHA
2.3.2 RESULTS OF FTA
2.3.3 MAJOR HAZARDOUS EVENTS
2.4 FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
2.4.1 SHIP GROUNDING
2.4.2 FIRE ACCIDENT

3. BASIS OF DESIGN
3.1 TRADE-OFF STUDY FOR TYPE OF CROSSING
3.1.1 ESTIMATED LENGTH OF VARIOUS CROSSING TYPES
3.1.2 CONSTRUCTION COST
3.2 DESIGN PRINCIPLE
3.3 LOADING CONDITIONS

4. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
4.1 ALIGNMENT
4.1.1 CONSIDERED TYPES
4.1.2 MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS
4.2 CROSS SECTION
4.2.1 CONSIDERED TYPES
4.2.2 MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS
4.3 SUPPORT STRUCTURE
4.3.1 PONTOONS
4.3.2 TETHERS
4.3.3 MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS
4.4 LOAD CALCULATION
4.4.1 PERMANENT LOADS
4.4.2 VARIABLE LOADS
4.4.3 TRAFFIC LOADS
4.4.4 BUOYANCY
4.4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL LOADS

5. CONSEQUENCE MODELLING APPROACH
5.1 1-D ANALYSIS
5.1.1 BOUNDARY CONDITION
5.1.2 T RANSFORMED SECTION
5.1.3 WAVE LOAD
5.2 3-D ANALYSIS
5.2.1 MODELLING
5.2.2 LOAD DEFINITION
5.2.3 LOAD COMBINATIONS
5.2.4 TETHER CONFIGURATION
5.3 SCENARIO 1: A LOSS OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE
5.3.1 1-D BEAM RESULTS
5.3.2 3-D ANALYSIS RESULTS
5.3.3 FINDINGS OF ANALYSIS

6. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
6.1 GENERAL
6.2 SELECTION OF THE SITE
6.3 CONSTRUCTION OF TUBE SEGMENTS
6.4 TRANSPORTATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TUBE PORTIONS
6.5 WEIGHT STABILITY AND SUBMERGENCE TESTS
6.6 INSTALLATION OF ANCHORS AND CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATION
6.7 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

7. OUTCOMES OF THE STUDY
7.1 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
7.2 DISCUSSIONS
7.3 CONCLUSION
7.4 FUTURE WORKS

8. BIBLIOGRAPHY

9. APPENDICES

본문내용

Innovative development in bridge and tunnel technology has made it possible to cross a great number of fjords and straits during the last few decades. However, there are still many locations which are too wide and too deep to be crossed by the bridges, floating bridges and sub-sea tunnels. For such fjords, Submerged Floating Crossing (SFC) seems to be a good solution for waterway crossing. Such structure has never been built so far anywhere in the world. But countries like Norway are planning to construct SFCs in the near future because its flexibility with respect to length and water depth makes it a suitable option for road traffic crossing in fjords, rivers, lakes and island connections.
Concept of SFC was initially presented by United Kingdom in 1886, however in Norway it was introduced in 1923 for the very first time. Since then it is the subject of research, as it suits most at many fjords in Norway.

참고자료

· Aibn(Accident Investigation Board Norway), 2013, “Report on Marine Accident MV Full City Grounding at Såstein 31 July 2009”, Report Sjø 2013/08, September 2013
· Blindheim, O., & Øvstedal, E. (1992). Water control in sub sea road tunnels in rock. Paper presented at the The 2ndSymposium on Strait Crossings.
· CIE4130 TU Delft, 2017, “Probablistic Design and Risk Management” Lecture note
· CT4145 TU Delft (A.V.Metrikine), 2018, “Dynamics, Slender Structures and an Introduction to Continuum Mechanics CT 4145 - Module Dynamics of Mechanical Systems and Slender Structures.”, Delft University of Technology
· CT5123 TU Delft (Dr. Garth N. Wells), 2009, “The Finite Element Method: An Introduction”, University of Cambridge and Delft University of Technology
· DNV, 2006, DNV-RP-F105, Free Spanning Pipelines, February 2006
· DNV, 2010a, DNV-RP-C204, October 2010
· DNV, 2010b, Marine Shipping Quantitative Risk Analysis – Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, Norway, 2010
· DNV, 2013, DNV-OSS-201, “Verification for Compliance with Norwegian Shelf Regulations”, October 2013
· DNV GL, 2017, DNVGL-OS-A101, Offshore Standards “Safety Principles and Arrangements” (p.19), January 2017
· DNV Technica (John Spouge), 1999, “A Guide To Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations(CMPT)”
· Espedal, T. G., & Nærum, G. (1994). Norway's rennfast link: The world's longest and deepest subsea road tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 9(2), 159-164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(94)90027-2
· Faber Maunsell Aecom, 2007, “ Forth Replacement Crossing Study – Comparison of other Tunnels and Bridges”, 49550TEDT, 3rd November 2007
· Fjeld, A. 2012, Feasibility study for crossing the Sognefjord: Submerged Floating Tunnel.
· Forsnes, M. K. 2015. Risk assessment of strait crossing bridges. NTNU
· Friis-Hansen, Peter, 2008, IWRAP MK II Working Document “Basic Modelling Principles for Prediction of Collision and Grounding Frequencies:”,Rev.4, Technical University of Denmark, 09 March 2008
· Frekvensanalyse senket flytende tunnel. Mulighetsstudie - Kryssing av Sognefjorden. Rambøll.
· Gamborg Hansen, M., Caballero, L., and Randrup-Thomsen, S. (2012a). Risikovurdering del I
· Gamborg Hansen, M., Caballero, L., Randrup-Thomsen, S., and Rasmussen, F. (2012b).
· Risikovurdering del II - Konsekvensanalyse senket flytende tunnel.Mulighetsstudie – Kryssing av Sognefjorden. Rambøll.
· Grantz, Walter C., 2010, “Conceptual study for a deep water, long span, Submerged Floating Tunnel (SFT) Crossing”, ISAB-2010
· Henning, J.E., Melby, K., Øvstedal, E., Amundsen, F.H., Ranes, G., 2007 «Experiences with Subsea Road Tunnels in Norway – Construction, Operation, Costs and Maintenance», Chinese
· Hokstad, P. R., Jenssen, G. D., Mostue, B. A., and Foss, T. (2012). Rapport: E39 Rogfast. ROS Analyse, tunnel. SINTEF and COWI.
· Johansen, I. L., 2010, “Foundations of risk assessment” ROSS report 201002, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
· Kartaltepe, N., 2008, “Preliminary Design and Analysis for an Immersed Tube Tunnel across the Izmir Bay”, The Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of Izmir Institute of Technology, October 2008
· Kystverket, 2018, AIS-statistikk 2017 – Langenuen, provided via e-mail address (Arnt.Runar. [e-mail]) on 09 May 2018
· ITA(International Tunneling Association), 2004, “Guideline for Structural Fire Resistance for Road Tunnels” by Working Group No.6 Maintenance and Repair, May, 2004Kartaltepe,
· OE44100, TU Delft, 2018, “Floating Structure and Offshore Mooring Lecture note 2017-2018”
· OGP, 2010a, Risk Assessment Data Directory – Consequence Modelling, Report No. 434-7, March 2010
· OGP, 2010b, Risk Assessment Data Directory – Ship/Installation Collisions, Report No. 434-16, March 2010
· Ovstedal, E., & Melby, Κ. (1992). Future design of sub-sea road tunnels based on cost and technical experience. Paper presented at the The 2ndSymposium on Strait Crossings.
· Pedersen, P. Terndrup: "Collision and Grounding Mechanics". Proc. WEMT 1995, Copenhagen, Volume 1, pp.125-157. 1995.
· Rausand, M., 2013, “Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications”. Vol. 115. 2013: John Wiley & Sons.
· Reinertsen, D. t. O. O. a. N. (2016). K3/K4 TECHNICAL REPORT.
· Statens vegvesen, 2016a, “Utviklingsstrategi for ferjefri og utbetra E39”, Nasjonal transportplan 2018-2019, Februar 2016
· Statens vegvesen, 2016b, “Bjørnafjorden Suspension Bridge - Design Basis”, SBT-PGR-BA-211-001-0
· TØI, 2012, “Vehicle fires in Norwegian road tunnels 2008-2011”, TØI report 1205-2012
· Tore H. Søreide, P. T. (2016). Bjørnafjord Submerged Floating Tube Bridge
· Vasudevan, Aji, 2010, “Tonnage measurement of ships: historical evolution, current issues and proposals for the way forward”, World Maritime University Dissertations
· Wallis, S. , 2010, “Strait Crossings symposium report – TunnelTalk” [online] Tunneltalk.com. Available at: https://www.tunneltalk.com/Strait-Crossings-Jan10-Conference-report.php [Accessed 10 Jun. 2018].
· Wierzbicki, T. and Suh, M. S., 1988, “Indentation of Tubes under Combined Loading”, International Journal of Mechanical Science Vol. 30 No. ¾ pp. 229-248, 1988
· Zhang, S., 1999, “The Mechanics of Ship Collisions”, Technical University of Denmark, January 1999