기업간거래시스템의국제비교

소개

기업간 거래 시스템의 국제 비교

목차

없음

본문내용

기업간 거래시스템의 국제 비교: 한국, 미국, 일본을 중심으로*
1. 머리말
기업간 거래시스템은 중간재의 생산과 거래를 둘러싸고 거래참가자들이 맺는 관계를 말한다. 이에 관한 그동안의 논의는 미국 MIT대학의 IMVP(International Motor Vehicle Program)를 비롯한 국제 비교연구를 통해 활발히 진행되어 왔으며, 국가별 산업조직과 거래시스템의 차이가 기술능력과 산업경쟁력의 격차를 가져온 중요한 원인으로 주목받았다(Helper, 1991; Nichiguchi, 1994; Helper & Sako, 1995; Nobeoka, 1996; Sako & Helper, 1998; 淺沼萬里, 1997). 이들 연구의 주요 결론은 미국의 경쟁적인 단기거래보다는 일본의 협조적인 장기계속거래가 효율적이라는 것이다. 그리고 이는 미국형과 일본형 기업시스템의 비교 경제학으로 이론화되기도 하였다(靑木昌彦·奧野正寬, 1996). 이와 같은 연구들은 일본의 협조적 거래시스템이 산업발전을 촉진시키고 있음을 보임으로써 ‘협조적 거래시스템 우위론’을 폭넓게 확산시켰다.
국내에서도 협조적 거래시스템 우위론의 영향력은 크다. 그동안 기업간 거래시스템에 관한 논의를 통해 ‘협조적 거래’가 특징인 일본형 시스템이 산업발전을 촉진시킨다는 인식이 확산되었다. 일본과 독일의 협조적 관계가 미국의 거리두기 관계(arm`s length relation)보다 혁신투자에 우위가 있다는 것이다. 이에 따라 협조적 거래시스템이 도입되어야 한다는 인식이 공유되었으며, 정부 또한 일본시스템을 모델로 삼는 산업정책들을 추진해왔다.

참고자료

· 강철규(1999), 재벌개혁의 경제학: 선단경영에서 독립경영으로, 다산출판사
· 박중구주현(1997), 한국 자동차산업의 도급관계와 활성화 방안, 산업연구원
· 이재희(2000), “벤처기업, 재벌, 한국의 산업정책”, 경제발전연구, 6(2), 155-183
· 전창환조영철 편(2001), 미국식 자본주의와 사회민주적 대안, 당대
· 홍장표(1999), “부품공급시스템”, 김양희 외, 한국자동차산업의 기술능력 발전, 삼성경제연구소, 167-220
· 今井賢一伊丹敬之小池和男(1982), 內部組織の經濟學, 東洋經濟新報社
· 水野順子(1996), 韓國の自動車産業, アジア經濟硏究所
· 淺沼萬里(1997), 日本の企業組織-革新的適應のメカニズム-, 東洋經濟新報社
· 靑木昌彦奧野正寬(1996), 經濟システムの比較制度分析, 東京大學出版會(기업구조연구회 역, 기업시스템의 비교경제학, 연암사, 1998)
· Amsden A. H. (1989), Asia`s Next Giant (이근달 역, 아시아의 다음 거인, 시사영어사, 1990)
· Burt R. (1992), "The Social Structure of Competition", Nohria N. & R. Eccles ed., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
· Chon, S. (1997), "Destroying the Myth of Vertical Integration in the Japanese Electronics Industry: Restructuring in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment Industry", Regional Studies, 31(1), 25-39
· Dosi G. (1988), "The Nature of the Innovation Process", in Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter
· Dyer J. H. (1996), "Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 19, 271-291
· Dyer J. H. (1997), "Effective Inter-firm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value", Management Journal, 18, 553-556
· Dyer J. H. & H. Singh(1998), "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679
· Dyer J. H. & K. Nobeoka(2000), "Creating and Managing a High-Performance Konwledge-Sharing Network: the Toyota Case", Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345-367
· Foss N. ed. (1997), Resources, Firms and Strategies, Oxford University Press, New York
· Granovetter, M. (1973), "The Strength of Weak Tie", American Journal of Sociology, 87(6), 1360-80
· Granovetter M. (1985), "Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510
· Helper S. (1991), "How Much Has Really Changed Between U.S. Automakers and Their Suppliers?", Sloan Management Review, Summer, 15-28
· Helper S. & M. Sako(1995), "Supplier Relations in Japan and the United States: Are They Converging?", Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 77-84
· Klein B., R. Crawford, A. Alchian(1978), "Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process", Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 297-326
· Kogut B. & U. Zander(1993), "Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation", Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625-45
· Langlois N.(1991), "Transaction-Cost Economics in Real Time", Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1) 99-127
· Lazonick W. & J. West (1998), “Organizational Integration and Competitive Advantage: Explaining Strategy and Performance in American Industry”, G. Dosi, D. Teece, J Chytry eds., Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, Oxford University Press: Oxford
· Molina J. & J. Dyer(1999), "On the Relational View, Response to Relational View Commentary", Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 184-186
· Mowery D., J. Oxley, B. Silverman(1998), "Technological Overlap and Interfirm Cooperation: Implications for the Resource-based View of the Firm", Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523
· Mudambi R. & S. Helper(1998), "The Close but Adversarial Model of Supplier Relations in the U.S. Auto Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 19, 775-792
· Nichiguchi, T. (1994), Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage, New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press
· Nobeoka, K (1996), “Alternative Component Sourcing Within the Manufacturer-Supplier Network: Benefits of Quasi Market Strategy in the Japanese Automobile Industry”, IMVP Research Paper
· Nooteboom B. (1999a), “Innovation, Learning and Industrial Organization”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 127-150
· Nooteboom B. (1999b), “Innovation and Inter-firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy”, Research Policy, 28, 793-805
· Nooteboom B. (2000), "Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance", Journal of Management and Governance, 4, 69-92
· O`Sullivan, M. (2000), Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany, Oxford University Press: Oxford
· Piore M. (1992), “Fragments of a Cognitive Theory of Technological Change and Organizational Structure”, Nohria N. & R. Eccles ed., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
· Robertson P. & R. Langlois(1995), "Innovation, Networks and Vertical Integration", Research Policy, 24, 543-562
· Rowley, T., D. Behrens, D. Krackhardt(2000), "Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386
· Sako M. (1992), Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
· Sako, M. & S. Helper(1998), “Determinants of Trust in Supplier Relations: Evidence from the Automotive Industry in Japan and the United States”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 387-417
· Saxenian A. (1998), “The Limits of Autarky: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128”, Fruin M. ed., Network, Market and the Pacific Rim, Oxford University Press, New York , Oxford
· Teece D.(1988), “Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm”, in Dosi, G., C. Feeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter
· Williamson O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York: Macmillan Publishers
· Williamson O. E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-296