PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

형사소송법상 압수수색 관련 규정에 대한 비판적 고찰 (A Critical Consideration of the Provisions Related to Seizure and Search in the Criminal Procedure Law)

34 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.27 최종저작일 2011.05
34P 미리보기
형사소송법상 압수수색 관련 규정에 대한 비판적 고찰
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 서울시립대학교 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
    · 수록지 정보 : 서울법학 / 19권 / 1호 / 189 ~ 222페이지
    · 저자명 : 김경수

    초록

    Changes in the judicial environment such as the enhancement of human rights and hearing-centrism are requesting a shift in the new paradigm for investigation, and accordingly the investigative agency shows a tendency to focus on the securing of material evidence. In the case of the violation of the Public Office Election Law by the governor of Jeju, the supreme court decided that the evidence collected without following the procedures stipulated in the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Law cannot, in principle, be used as the evidence for a plea of guilty as it does not follow the legal procedures stipulated to guarantee basic human rights. And Subsec. 2 of Sec. 308 of the revised Criminal Procedure Law requires that the evidence collected without following legal procedures cannot be used as the material evidence, thereby stipulating the principle of excluding the illegally collected evidence.
    This tendency is interpreted as th expression of the will to devise the phenomena of having the admissibility of evidence denied due to procedural illegality in the process of investigation beforehand. Ultimately, it is seen as the effort to observe the due process of law, harmonize the finding of substantial truth with the protection of the accused' human rights and realize the idea of criminal procedure.
    And as for problems such as the duty of warrant presentation, the scope of warrant notice, independent urgent seizure and search, the object of seizure and search of electronic information or savings credit, there are no or few grounds in the Criminal Procedure Law, leading to controversy in interpretation and great confusion in the practices of investigation. This confusion would result in engaging in the right and wrong of procedural legality and causing the phenomenon of getting the admissibility of evidence of the material evidence seized. Accordingly, this study was intended to overcome these problems through efforts for legislative improvement such as the establishment or amendment of substantive enactment in the Criminal Procedure Law and find out the way to harmonize the finding of substantial truth and the protection of the accused' human rights.

    영어초록

    Changes in the judicial environment such as the enhancement of human rights and hearing-centrism are requesting a shift in the new paradigm for investigation, and accordingly the investigative agency shows a tendency to focus on the securing of material evidence. In the case of the violation of the Public Office Election Law by the governor of Jeju, the supreme court decided that the evidence collected without following the procedures stipulated in the Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Law cannot, in principle, be used as the evidence for a plea of guilty as it does not follow the legal procedures stipulated to guarantee basic human rights. And Subsec. 2 of Sec. 308 of the revised Criminal Procedure Law requires that the evidence collected without following legal procedures cannot be used as the material evidence, thereby stipulating the principle of excluding the illegally collected evidence.
    This tendency is interpreted as th expression of the will to devise the phenomena of having the admissibility of evidence denied due to procedural illegality in the process of investigation beforehand. Ultimately, it is seen as the effort to observe the due process of law, harmonize the finding of substantial truth with the protection of the accused' human rights and realize the idea of criminal procedure.
    And as for problems such as the duty of warrant presentation, the scope of warrant notice, independent urgent seizure and search, the object of seizure and search of electronic information or savings credit, there are no or few grounds in the Criminal Procedure Law, leading to controversy in interpretation and great confusion in the practices of investigation. This confusion would result in engaging in the right and wrong of procedural legality and causing the phenomenon of getting the admissibility of evidence of the material evidence seized. Accordingly, this study was intended to overcome these problems through efforts for legislative improvement such as the establishment or amendment of substantive enactment in the Criminal Procedure Law and find out the way to harmonize the finding of substantial truth and the protection of the accused' human rights.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 07월 23일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
4:50 오전