실내·공간디자인 관련학과의 교육과정 변화 경향 분석- 학제별 기초, 실무, 디지털 & 융·복합 교과목 비교분석을 중심으로 - (Analyzing the Trend of Curriculum Change in Interior and Space Design Related Departments - Focusing on Comparative Analysis of Basic, Practical, Digital & Convergence Subjects according to School Sys)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국문화공간건축학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 / 71호 / 205 ~ 212페이지
· 저자명 : 이종숙, 박현옥

초록

This study was conducted to present the direction of future education through the distribution of curriculum by schoolsystem through the analysis of the curriculum on the recent homepage of the Department of Interior and Space Design. Thesurvey targets are 48 universities including 26 for 2-3 years, 22 for 4 years, and research methods through literature researchon prior research in the last 20 years and content analysis of curriculum subjects uploaded to each university's website. Theresearch results are as follows. First, the curriculum of universities related to interior and space design is divided into basiceducation, practical education aimed at job competency units, and digital & convergence/combination education courses thatreflect digital trends. Second, in the case of a 2- or 3-year colleges, there were many practical subjects, and according to theNCS model, education by vocational competency was conducted. On the other hand, even in the case of the four-year system,practical training in response to industrial change is provided, but project-type training is provided, and education related todigital and convergence in response to the fourth industrial revolution is being reinforced and diversified. Finally, based on theresults of these studies, the curriculum for each school system can be categorized. The two- or three-year colleges arecategorized into basic education general type, design practical application type, and digital design type. The four-year collegecurriculum is basic education specialization and connection type, design practice project type, digital & convergence type. It canbe seen that the curriculums related to interior and space design are differentiated by the school system and the creation ofnew areas required by the future society is in progress. This study suggests the difference and direction of curriculum byschool system as the basic work, and suggests that studies on various educational methods required by the society of societyare also required. Especially in the corona situation, a new era of non-face-to-face education is beginning in face-to-faceeducation. The study on the delivery system of this curriculum is intended to be left as the next research task.

영어초록

This study was conducted to present the direction of future education through the distribution of curriculum by schoolsystem through the analysis of the curriculum on the recent homepage of the Department of Interior and Space Design. Thesurvey targets are 48 universities including 26 for 2-3 years, 22 for 4 years, and research methods through literature researchon prior research in the last 20 years and content analysis of curriculum subjects uploaded to each university's website. Theresearch results are as follows. First, the curriculum of universities related to interior and space design is divided into basiceducation, practical education aimed at job competency units, and digital & convergence/combination education courses thatreflect digital trends. Second, in the case of a 2- or 3-year colleges, there were many practical subjects, and according to theNCS model, education by vocational competency was conducted. On the other hand, even in the case of the four-year system,practical training in response to industrial change is provided, but project-type training is provided, and education related todigital and convergence in response to the fourth industrial revolution is being reinforced and diversified. Finally, based on theresults of these studies, the curriculum for each school system can be categorized. The two- or three-year colleges arecategorized into basic education general type, design practical application type, and digital design type. The four-year collegecurriculum is basic education specialization and connection type, design practice project type, digital & convergence type. It canbe seen that the curriculums related to interior and space design are differentiated by the school system and the creation ofnew areas required by the future society is in progress. This study suggests the difference and direction of curriculum byschool system as the basic work, and suggests that studies on various educational methods required by the society of societyare also required. Especially in the corona situation, a new era of non-face-to-face education is beginning in face-to-faceeducation. The study on the delivery system of this curriculum is intended to be left as the next research task.

참고자료

· 없음