칠십인역 헬라어의 Auvto,j(단수 주격 형태) 용법 연구 -칠십인역 창세기, 룻기, 전도서, 이사야, 마카비2서 분석- (The Usage of Auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) in LXX Greek: Analyses of LXX Genesis, Ruth, Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, and 2 Maccabees)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 성경원문연구 / 32호 / 112 ~ 136페이지
· 저자명 : 김주한

초록

In this article I research the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom) in the LXX Greek. Classical Greek grammarians have insisted that the nominative form of auvto,j is not used as a person pronoun. Instead, it either intensifies a noun, which is modified by auvto,j, with the meaning of “oneself” or emphasises the noun with the meaning of “the same”, in the name of the special usage of auvto,j. But, from some passages in the LXX, we sometimes find examples that seem to imply the usage as the pronoun of auvto,j (m.sg.nom). For this phenomenon, grammatical explanation is to be requested. However, well-known LXX Greek grammar books, such as those of F. C. Conybeare and G. Stock (English), H. J. Thackeray (English) and S. -N. Kang (Korean), do not provide sufficient explanation of this phenomenon. They just mention that such a phenomenon is found in a few books in the LXX. Such a situation have sometimes produced difficulties not only in understanding the nature and feature of LXX Greek, but also in investigating the influence of LXX Greek on NT Greek as well as the literary or/and genealogical relationship(s) between the Hebrew Vorlage and the LXX. The very reason of this situation is the absence in the study of the usage of auvto,j in the sphere of the LXX Greek. Thus I try to investigate the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) in the LXX in order to offer hints to solve the above- mentioned difficulties. To achieve this aim, I tried to analyse and compare the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) and its substitutes in a few selected books in the LXX, i.e. LXX Genesis (literary translation), LXX Ruth and Ecclesiastes (literal translations), LXX Isaiah (free translation), and 2 Maccabees (original, but summarised, Greek work), and revealed that auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) was used as personal pronoun in the third person in the LXX and its occurrence increased in later books of the LXX.

영어초록

In this article I research the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom) in the LXX Greek. Classical Greek grammarians have insisted that the nominative form of auvto,j is not used as a person pronoun. Instead, it either intensifies a noun, which is modified by auvto,j, with the meaning of “oneself” or emphasises the noun with the meaning of “the same”, in the name of the special usage of auvto,j. But, from some passages in the LXX, we sometimes find examples that seem to imply the usage as the pronoun of auvto,j (m.sg.nom). For this phenomenon, grammatical explanation is to be requested. However, well-known LXX Greek grammar books, such as those of F. C. Conybeare and G. Stock (English), H. J. Thackeray (English) and S. -N. Kang (Korean), do not provide sufficient explanation of this phenomenon. They just mention that such a phenomenon is found in a few books in the LXX. Such a situation have sometimes produced difficulties not only in understanding the nature and feature of LXX Greek, but also in investigating the influence of LXX Greek on NT Greek as well as the literary or/and genealogical relationship(s) between the Hebrew Vorlage and the LXX. The very reason of this situation is the absence in the study of the usage of auvto,j in the sphere of the LXX Greek. Thus I try to investigate the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) in the LXX in order to offer hints to solve the above- mentioned difficulties. To achieve this aim, I tried to analyse and compare the usage of auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) and its substitutes in a few selected books in the LXX, i.e. LXX Genesis (literary translation), LXX Ruth and Ecclesiastes (literal translations), LXX Isaiah (free translation), and 2 Maccabees (original, but summarised, Greek work), and revealed that auvto,j (m.sg.nom.) was used as personal pronoun in the third person in the LXX and its occurrence increased in later books of the LXX.

참고자료

· 없음