시각장애학생과 정안학생의 국어 어휘력 비교 연구 (A Study on the Comparison of Vocabulary Abilities of Student with Visual Impaired Students to those of Normal Students)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대구대학교 한국특수교육문제연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 특수교육저널:이론과 실천 / 9권 / 1호 / 251 ~ 277페이지
· 저자명 : 이해균, 김옥현

초록

본 연구는 시각장애학교와 일반학교 중·고등학생의 국어 어휘의 요인별 즉, 동의어, 반의어, 하위어, 유의어 이해력과 정답률 차이, 시각장애학생의 변인에 따른 어휘력 차이에 대한 실태를 조사하여 서로 어떠한 차이가 있는지 비교함으로써, 시각장애학생의 국어 어휘 지도에 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있도록 하는데 연구의 목적이 있다. 연구의 대상은 시각장애학생 120명과 정안학생 191명, 총 311명으로 전국에 소재한 시각장애학교와 서부 경남에 소재한 일반학교에 재학 중인 중·고등학생이다. 연구의 결론으로는 첫째, 시각장애학생과 정안학생의 요인별 국어 어휘력의 비교에서는 정안학생들이 시각장애학생보다, 중학생보다는 고등학생의 어휘력이 높았으나, 전체적인 비교에서 정안 중학생과 시각장애 고등학생 간에는 차이가 없었다. 둘째, 시각장애학생과 정안학생의 어휘력의 요인별 정답률 비교에서는 모든 요인에서 정안학생이 시각장애학생보다 정답률이 높았다. 그러나 하위어 ‘시대에 따른 소설’ 문항과, 유의어 ‘춘부장’과 ‘샛별’ 문항의 정답률은 시각장애학생의 정답률이 약간 높았다. 셋째, 시각장애학생의 변인별 어휘력 비교에서는 맹학생보다는 저시력 학생이, 기숙사보다는 자택에 거주하는 학생이, 선천성보다는 후천성 학생의 어휘력이 다소 높았으나 변인에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is looking into comparing the comprehension of Korean vocabulary elements composed of absolute synonyms, antonyms, hyponyms and partial synonyms of the visually impaired with that of normal students, and the difference of the vocabulary ability according to the variable elements of the visually impaired so as to use this research in teaching the visually impaired the Korean vocabularies.
The concrete methods to achieve this purpose are as follows.
First, I will find out the comprehension difference of Korean vocabularies and the normal students. Second, I will find out the percentage of correct answers to Korean vocabularies between the visually impaired and the normal students. Third, I will find out the difference of vocabulary ability according to the level of visual handicap, the type of residence and the time of visual handicap.
I make up a question to 120 visually impaired students all around the country and 191 middle and high school students in the western Gyeong Sang Nam Do.
The research of this study was carried out for a month from May 10th, 2006 to June 10th, 2006. I called the school for the visually impaired and the normal school beforehand, got a permission to make a research and then post research papers to them. The question paper was translated into Braille to the blind and enlarged into 20 point to the students having a bad eyesight. The 150 copies of research paper was sent to the visually impaired and 200 copies of them to the general schools. The 120 copies of them was brought back from the visually students and 191 copies of them from the normal students.
The research paper were analyzed with SPSS 10.0 for windows. The dual variable analysis is used for the comparison of vocabulary ability between the visually impaired and the normal students. The frequency analysis is used for the comparison of correct answers in each element of vocabulary ability. And The independent T analysis is used for the comparison of vocabulary ability according to characteristics of the visually impaired.
The conclusion based on this analysis is as follows.
First, the vocabulary ability of normal students is higher than that of the visually impaired students. And the vocabulary ability of the visually impaired students in high school is higher than that of the visually impaired students in middle school. But there is little difference between the normal students in middle school and the visually impaired students in high school.
Second, the percentage of correct answers of normal students is much higher than that of the visually impaired students. But The visually impaired students answered the questions of hyponyms of ‘novels according to an era', partial synonyms of ‘other people’s father' and the percentage of correct answers of ‘Venus' better than the normal students.
Third, the vocabulary ability of students having bad eyesight, living in their own house and having acquired visual disability is higher than the blind, the students living in the dormitory and having inborn visual disability. And the vocabulary ability of urban students is higher than that of rural students. But there is little difference between the vocabulary of the normal students in the country and that of the visually impaired students in the city.

참고자료

· 없음