1920년대, 1930년대 국내 번역 담론과 번역학 이론과의 연계성 고찰 (A Study of the Relationship between Translation Discourse of 1920s and 1930s in Korea and Translation Theories)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국동서비교문학학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동서비교문학저널 / 20호 / 77 ~ 110페이지
· 저자명 : 박옥수

초록

1920s and 1930s were the times when translations were produced using modern methods and regarded as a type of literature in Korea. During this period, translations of foreign literature were introduced and translation criticism was performed in earnest. The fact that the translations were practiced through direct translation from source texts’ language is meaningful from the viewpoint of criticism. It means that the translated works became the objects of criticism for the first time. The noticeable thing is that the discourses of criticism in those days involved the developmental process and contents of translation theories. It has been revealed that the translation strategies are various since translation theories reflect the translation practice and develop on the basis of translation phenomena.
This paper examines the standpoint of criticism in those times and correlates the contents of criticism with translation theories. The aspects of translations and translation strategies are naturally revealed and discussed in the process.
Criticism in Korea started with linguistic issues and developed into the culture and text level. Then it proceeded into Descriptive Translation Studies dealing with the social and literary status of translation works. The arguing points of criticism in 1920s are literal or free translation, literary style, and expression of translating words while those in 1930s were extended and discussed the status of translation studies, selection of source texts, and general presence of translation works within the society. In brief, criticism of 1920s performed from a linguistic point of view while that of 1930s referred the relationship between the translation, and social and literary system in the society.

영어초록

1920s and 1930s were the times when translations were produced using modern methods and regarded as a type of literature in Korea. During this period, translations of foreign literature were introduced and translation criticism was performed in earnest. The fact that the translations were practiced through direct translation from source texts’ language is meaningful from the viewpoint of criticism. It means that the translated works became the objects of criticism for the first time. The noticeable thing is that the discourses of criticism in those days involved the developmental process and contents of translation theories. It has been revealed that the translation strategies are various since translation theories reflect the translation practice and develop on the basis of translation phenomena.
This paper examines the standpoint of criticism in those times and correlates the contents of criticism with translation theories. The aspects of translations and translation strategies are naturally revealed and discussed in the process.
Criticism in Korea started with linguistic issues and developed into the culture and text level. Then it proceeded into Descriptive Translation Studies dealing with the social and literary status of translation works. The arguing points of criticism in 1920s are literal or free translation, literary style, and expression of translating words while those in 1930s were extended and discussed the status of translation studies, selection of source texts, and general presence of translation works within the society. In brief, criticism of 1920s performed from a linguistic point of view while that of 1930s referred the relationship between the translation, and social and literary system in the society.

참고자료

· 없음