• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

마음과 정신 - 영미의 신헤겔주의가 하린(賀麟)의 신심학에 미친 정신철 학 연구 (Introduction of Neo-Confuciansm and the Roles of Jipo(Kim Gu) in the Period of the Yuan Dynasty's Interference into Goyreo's Internal Affairs)

28 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.17 최종저작일 2017.03
28P 미리보기
마음과 정신 - 영미의 신헤겔주의가 하린(賀麟)의 신심학에 미친 정신철 학 연구
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국중국문화학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 중국학논총 / 53호 / 59 ~ 86페이지
    · 저자명 : 유헌식

    초록

    He Lin was the person who advocated Xin Xin Xue against Xin Li Xue of Feng You Lan in modern Chinese philosophy. He recognized the limitations of Neo-Confucianism, that is, Cheng-Zhu Li Xue(程朱理學) and Lu-Wang Xin Xue(陸王心學), in philosophical justification of the subjective thought that is required for constituting the thoughts of natural science and the modern society that came from the West, and draws on the thoughts of Greens and Royce as supplementation. Inspired by Royce who claimed the consciousness of objects or psychic dependence through idealism of Kant and Hegel as mental dependence in School of Mind, He Lin renewed his understanding of Lu-Wang Xin Xue, reconstituted Cheng-Zhu Li Xue, and created a new School of Mind.
    In this work, He Lin first focuses on how Green and Royce explain the relationship between consciousness and things(nature). They argue that things(nature) are meaningless apart from their relationship with consciousness as they secure its truth and existence only through the ‘relation’ of individual perceptions, not by themselves. Since ‘relationship’ comes from the distinction and unification of consciousness, the reality of things has no other way but to depend entirely on consciousness. Here, He Lin connects such characteristics of this consciousness with Xin(心, mind) of Lu-Wang and turns Wu(物, objects) into Xin(mind). However, He Lin extends the meaning of mind beyond the subjective principle of knowledge in the Kantian sense to the objective concept of mind from the Hegelian sense. Here, mind in Yangmingism finds a way to reconcile with Xing(性, Li, 理) of Neo-Confucianism. He Lin says that Xing, Li, and Xim are eventually all the same but technically, he accepts the conscious philosophy(philosophy of spirit) of Green and Royce, gives the characteristics of Xim to Xing, and takes measures for Li of Xing to be realized. If the reality of existence depends on the relationship and unity of consciousness, consciousness cannot simply stay in subjectivity and should be in objectivity as well. Therefore, consciousness should escape from human consciousness or self, should have existential nature, which Hegel calls spirit, and He Lin equates it with Xing of Neo-Confucianism. In Neo-Confucianism, Xing, Xim, and Li are not separated but accompany one another but when expressed in terms of German ideology, Xing is the spirit(Geist), Xim is consciousness(Bewußtsein), and the Li is concept(Begriff) or reason(Vernunft) respectively. Li is the principle that Xing expresses itself, and Xim is the medium that shows the principle of Xing in Phaenomena.
    This transition from subjective idealism to objective idealism is treated as the issue of overcoming the so-called ‘agnosticism’ in Neo-Hegelianism of England and America in relation to overcoming of Kant's issue of ‘things in themselves’. In particular, Royce, following Hegel, reveals through a demonstration that ‘the unknown’ is nothing more than a fiction. The nature set by things themselves seems to be physically sensible, but in reality is a mental one that is revealed only by ideas. Based on these ideas of Royce’s, He Lin newly establishes the relationship between Ti(體) and Yong(用). Especially focusing on the concept of ‘concrete universal’ by Hegel, he is against the idea of Zhu Xi that views Ti and Yong as dualism of Li(理) and Qi(氣), gives the meaning of consciousness of Hegel to Xin of Yangmingism, and thinks that Ti already embraces Yong centering on Xin. Based on these facts, he interpreted the Weifa-Yifa(未發-已發), which Zhu Xi distinguished as Ti and Yong, from the perspective of School of Mind of Yangmingism, and understands self-cultivation of Yangmingism or Selbst-Bildung of Hegel as psychological or mental philosophical application about Weifa-Yifa. Thus, He Lin was able to make Noumena(體/理) communicate with Phaenomena(用/氣), tried spiritual explanation, and could maintain that spiritualism is Wei Xing Lun(唯性論). Here, Xin(mind) is not the Xin of Lu-Wang Xin Xue but objective spirit of existence(the universe).

    영어초록

    He Lin was the person who advocated Xin Xin Xue against Xin Li Xue of Feng You Lan in modern Chinese philosophy. He recognized the limitations of Neo-Confucianism, that is, Cheng-Zhu Li Xue(程朱理學) and Lu-Wang Xin Xue(陸王心學), in philosophical justification of the subjective thought that is required for constituting the thoughts of natural science and the modern society that came from the West, and draws on the thoughts of Greens and Royce as supplementation. Inspired by Royce who claimed the consciousness of objects or psychic dependence through idealism of Kant and Hegel as mental dependence in School of Mind, He Lin renewed his understanding of Lu-Wang Xin Xue, reconstituted Cheng-Zhu Li Xue, and created a new School of Mind.
    In this work, He Lin first focuses on how Green and Royce explain the relationship between consciousness and things(nature). They argue that things(nature) are meaningless apart from their relationship with consciousness as they secure its truth and existence only through the ‘relation’ of individual perceptions, not by themselves. Since ‘relationship’ comes from the distinction and unification of consciousness, the reality of things has no other way but to depend entirely on consciousness. Here, He Lin connects such characteristics of this consciousness with Xin(心, mind) of Lu-Wang and turns Wu(物, objects) into Xin(mind). However, He Lin extends the meaning of mind beyond the subjective principle of knowledge in the Kantian sense to the objective concept of mind from the Hegelian sense. Here, mind in Yangmingism finds a way to reconcile with Xing(性, Li, 理) of Neo-Confucianism. He Lin says that Xing, Li, and Xim are eventually all the same but technically, he accepts the conscious philosophy(philosophy of spirit) of Green and Royce, gives the characteristics of Xim to Xing, and takes measures for Li of Xing to be realized. If the reality of existence depends on the relationship and unity of consciousness, consciousness cannot simply stay in subjectivity and should be in objectivity as well. Therefore, consciousness should escape from human consciousness or self, should have existential nature, which Hegel calls spirit, and He Lin equates it with Xing of Neo-Confucianism. In Neo-Confucianism, Xing, Xim, and Li are not separated but accompany one another but when expressed in terms of German ideology, Xing is the spirit(Geist), Xim is consciousness(Bewußtsein), and the Li is concept(Begriff) or reason(Vernunft) respectively. Li is the principle that Xing expresses itself, and Xim is the medium that shows the principle of Xing in Phaenomena.
    This transition from subjective idealism to objective idealism is treated as the issue of overcoming the so-called ‘agnosticism’ in Neo-Hegelianism of England and America in relation to overcoming of Kant's issue of ‘things in themselves’. In particular, Royce, following Hegel, reveals through a demonstration that ‘the unknown’ is nothing more than a fiction. The nature set by things themselves seems to be physically sensible, but in reality is a mental one that is revealed only by ideas. Based on these ideas of Royce’s, He Lin newly establishes the relationship between Ti(體) and Yong(用). Especially focusing on the concept of ‘concrete universal’ by Hegel, he is against the idea of Zhu Xi that views Ti and Yong as dualism of Li(理) and Qi(氣), gives the meaning of consciousness of Hegel to Xin of Yangmingism, and thinks that Ti already embraces Yong centering on Xin. Based on these facts, he interpreted the Weifa-Yifa(未發-已發), which Zhu Xi distinguished as Ti and Yong, from the perspective of School of Mind of Yangmingism, and understands self-cultivation of Yangmingism or Selbst-Bildung of Hegel as psychological or mental philosophical application about Weifa-Yifa. Thus, He Lin was able to make Noumena(體/理) communicate with Phaenomena(用/氣), tried spiritual explanation, and could maintain that spiritualism is Wei Xing Lun(唯性論). Here, Xin(mind) is not the Xin of Lu-Wang Xin Xue but objective spirit of existence(the universe).

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“중국학논총”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 08일 월요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
9:43 오전