Establishment of a Belt and Road Dispute Settlement Mechanism
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : China and WTO Review / 5권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Weidong Zhu
ㆍ저자명 : Weidong Zhu
목차
1. IntroductionII. The Necessity for the Establishment of A BR Dispute Settlement Mechanism
III. Two Starting Points for Establishing a BR Dispute Settlement Mechanism
A. The Features of the BRI
B. Status quo of the Dispute Settlement Legal Framework amongthe BR Countries
IV. Ways to Establish a BR DisputeSettlement Mechanism
A. The Improvement of China’s Foreign-related Civil, Commercial andInvestment Dispute Settlement Mechanism
B. Facilitation of a Bilateral Dispute Settlement Mechanism betweenChina and Other BR Countries
C. Proposal to Build a Multilateral Dispute Settlement Mechanismamong the BR countries
V. Conclusion
References
영어 초록
Considering the large number of civil, commercial and investment disputes that arise between Chinese investors and their counterparts along the Belt and Road, it is necessary to establish a dispute settlement mechanism. The open, cooperative and non-institutionalized features of the Belt and Road Initiative require the reform and improvement of China’s domestic dispute settlement mechanism for foreign civil, commercial and investment disputes; and bilateral and multilateral dispute settlement mechanisms between or among China and the Belt and Road countries should be strengthened. When appropriate, China may propose the establishment of a multilateral dispute settlement mechanism that is especially designed for the Initiative. The status quo of dispute settlement mechanisms between China and the Belt and Road countries necessitates the establishment of a preset mechanism that uses arbitration as the primary approach, litigation as the secondary approach, and mediation as an alternative.참고 자료
없음"China and WTO Review"의 다른 논문
- Human Rights Education in the Chinese Context24페이지
- Necessity or Luxury? Sober Second Thoughts on the Chine..32페이지
- ‘Foreign Elements’ in the Arbitration of China’s Free T..26페이지
- China’s Practice in Vessel Tonnage Tax Collection: Legi..20페이지
- Digitalization of Trade in Free Trade Agreements with R..18페이지
- Crimes Committed by Legal Persons: A Comparative Sino-G..18페이지
- Statutory Safeguards and Privileges for Developing Coun..16페이지
- Pending Section 232 Litigation and Broader Trade Trends..12페이지
- Is Huawei a Leverage of the US-China Trade War? A Criti..8페이지
- The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation: An Investment Pe..12페이지