ADHD, 아이트래킹 국외 연구 요약 발표 영어 PPT

문서 내 토픽

1. Eye tracking measure

Eye tracking은 비침습적인 비디오 기반 눈 모니터를 사용하여 수행되며, 자동으로 눈 움직임을 기록합니다. 헤드마운트 눈 모니터와 원격 탁상용 모니터가 있습니다. 눈 추적 측정에는 사accade, 추적, 장면/얼굴 지각 중 눈 움직임, 동공 확장 등이 포함됩니다.
2. Eye tracking in children and adolescents: Normative development

정상 발달 아동과 청소년의 경우 사accade 반응 시간은 점진적으로 감소하고, 반대사accade 반응 시간과 오류율은 크게 개선됩니다. 느린 속도의 추적 과제에서는 어린 아동과 성인 간 성능 차이가 크지 않지만, 빠른 속도의 추적 과제에서는 청소년기까지 성능이 향상됩니다. 또한 아동은 언어적 모호성을 해결하는 과정에서 눈 움직임을 보입니다. 동공 확장은 아동과 청소년의 인지 과정을 반영합니다.
3. Eye tracking in children and adolescents: Atypical development

정신분열병 환자의 경우 추적 눈 움직임에 손상이 있습니다. 자폐 스펙트럼 장애 아동은 사회적으로 관련된 자극에 대한 응시 패턴에 결함이 있습니다. ADHD 아동은 외부 유도 사accade와 내부 유도 사accade, 특히 반대사accade 과제에서 결함을 보입니다.
4. Critique of studies of eye tracking in normative and atypical development

정상 발달 연구에서 과제 수행 능력의 발달 궤적을 파악하는 것은 어려울 수 있습니다. 측정 도구의 심리측정적 특성, 즉 변동성, 신뢰성, 변별력, 천장 효과 또는 바닥 효과 등을 고려해야 합니다. 대부분의 발달 연구가 횡단적 접근을 취했으며, 주의력의 역할에 대한 고려가 부족했습니다.
5. Limitations of eye tracking as a tool

눈 움직임 연구에서 얻은 결과를 다른 운동 체계로 일반화하기는 어렵습니다. 실험실에서의 눈 움직임이 실제 세계와 다를 수 있습니다. 전형적으로 발달하는 아동이나 국소 병변이 없는 정신 장애 환자에서 특정 뇌 영역에 대한 추론에 한계가 있습니다. 발달 및 임상적 차이의 원인에 대한 추론에도 한계가 있습니다.
6. Strengths and potentials of eye tracking as a tool

눈 움직임 연구는 다양한 연령대와 임상군을 비교할 수 있는 강력한 수단입니다. 성인에서의 인지, 정서, 동기 연구에서 축적된 합의된 눈 추적 측정 정의를 활용할 수 있습니다. 전형적 및 비전형적 집단에서 다양한 번역 연구에 유용합니다. 정서 과정 및 사회 정보 처리에 대한 아동 및 청소년의 눈 움직임 연구가 가능합니다.
7. Theoretical accounts of attentional bias in affective disorders

불안 장애에서는 위협 자극에 대한 탐지 용이성과 위협 자극에서 주의 전환의 어려움이 관찰됩니다. 우울증에서는 우울한 내용에 주의를 자발적으로 유지하는 경향이 있습니다. 이러한 주의 편향은 자극 탐지 후 발생하며, 위협 자극이 불안한 개인의 주의를 더 오래 유지합니다.
8. Advancing theoretical accounts of attentional bias with eye tracking

주의 편향을 연구하기 위해 눈 추적을 활용할 수 있습니다. 위협 자극이 표적인 배열에서 탐지 용이성, 중립 표적이 위협 방해자와 함께 있는 배열에서 주의 전환의 어려움, 자극 제시 시점에서의 초기 시선 고정 등을 측정할 수 있습니다.

Easy AI와 토픽 톺아보기

1. Eye tracking measure

Eye tracking is a powerful tool that can provide valuable insights into various cognitive and behavioral processes. It allows researchers to objectively measure and analyze an individual's visual attention and gaze patterns, which can reveal important information about their underlying cognitive and perceptual mechanisms. Eye tracking has been widely used in a range of fields, including psychology, neuroscience, marketing, and human-computer interaction, to study a variety of phenomena, such as reading, scene perception, decision-making, and emotional processing. By tracking the movement and fixation of the eyes, researchers can gain a better understanding of how individuals allocate their attention and process information, which can have important implications for both theoretical and applied research. However, it is important to consider the limitations and potential biases associated with eye tracking, such as the influence of individual differences, task demands, and environmental factors on eye movement patterns. Additionally, the interpretation of eye tracking data requires careful consideration of the specific research questions and the underlying theoretical frameworks. Overall, eye tracking is a valuable tool that can provide unique and valuable insights, but its use should be accompanied by a thoughtful and nuanced approach to data collection and analysis.
2. Eye tracking in children and adolescents: Normative development

The use of eye tracking in the study of normative development in children and adolescents is a valuable approach that can provide important insights into the cognitive, perceptual, and attentional processes that underlie typical development. By tracking the eye movements of children and adolescents during various tasks and activities, researchers can gain a better understanding of how these processes change and evolve over the course of development. For example, studies have shown that the ability to maintain sustained attention and inhibit distractions improves significantly from early childhood to adolescence, and these changes can be observed through eye tracking measures. Additionally, eye tracking can be used to investigate the development of social cognition, language processing, and other higher-order cognitive functions in children and adolescents. However, it is important to consider the unique challenges and considerations involved in conducting eye tracking research with these populations, such as the need for age-appropriate task design, the potential for individual differences in attention and motivation, and the ethical considerations of working with minors. Overall, the use of eye tracking in the study of normative development in children and adolescents has the potential to provide valuable insights that can inform our understanding of typical cognitive and perceptual development and inform the design of educational and intervention strategies.
3. Eye tracking in children and adolescents: Atypical development

The use of eye tracking in the study of atypical development in children and adolescents is a valuable approach that can provide important insights into the cognitive, perceptual, and attentional processes that underlie various developmental disorders and psychopathologies. By tracking the eye movements of children and adolescents with conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and anxiety disorders, researchers can gain a better understanding of the specific attentional and information processing deficits that characterize these conditions. For example, studies have shown that individuals with autism spectrum disorder often exhibit atypical patterns of visual attention and social information processing, which can be detected through eye tracking measures. Similarly, individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may exhibit difficulties with sustained attention and inhibitory control, which can be observed through eye tracking. Additionally, eye tracking can be used to investigate the role of attentional biases in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. However, it is important to consider the unique challenges and considerations involved in conducting eye tracking research with these populations, such as the need for age-appropriate task design, the potential for individual differences in attention and motivation, and the ethical considerations of working with vulnerable populations. Overall, the use of eye tracking in the study of atypical development in children and adolescents has the potential to provide valuable insights that can inform our understanding of the underlying cognitive and perceptual processes involved in various developmental disorders and psychopathologies, and inform the design of targeted interventions and support strategies.
4. Critique of studies of eye tracking in normative and atypical development

While eye tracking has been widely used to study both normative and atypical development in children and adolescents, there are several important critiques and limitations that should be considered. One key critique is the potential for confounding factors and individual differences to influence eye movement patterns, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions about the underlying cognitive and perceptual processes. For example, factors such as task demands, environmental distractions, and individual differences in attention, motivation, and cognitive abilities can all impact eye movement patterns, making it challenging to isolate the specific processes of interest. Additionally, there are concerns about the ecological validity of many eye tracking studies, which often involve highly controlled laboratory settings that may not accurately reflect real-world cognitive and perceptual processes. Another critique is the potential for biases and measurement errors in eye tracking data, particularly in studies involving young children or individuals with developmental disorders, who may have difficulty maintaining stable eye gaze or following task instructions. Finally, there are ethical considerations around the use of eye tracking with vulnerable populations, such as the need for informed consent, the potential for distress or discomfort, and the need to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Overall, while eye tracking can be a valuable tool for studying normative and atypical development, it is important to consider these critiques and limitations and to employ rigorous methodological approaches to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
5. Limitations of eye tracking as a tool

While eye tracking is a powerful tool for studying cognitive and perceptual processes, it is important to recognize its limitations and potential drawbacks. One key limitation is the potential for confounding factors and individual differences to influence eye movement patterns, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions about the underlying processes of interest. Factors such as task demands, environmental distractions, and individual differences in attention, motivation, and cognitive abilities can all impact eye movement patterns, making it challenging to isolate the specific processes being studied. Additionally, there are concerns about the ecological validity of many eye tracking studies, which often involve highly controlled laboratory settings that may not accurately reflect real-world cognitive and perceptual processes. Another limitation is the potential for measurement errors and biases in eye tracking data, particularly in studies involving young children or individuals with developmental disorders, who may have difficulty maintaining stable eye gaze or following task instructions. There are also ethical considerations around the use of eye tracking with vulnerable populations, such as the need for informed consent, the potential for distress or discomfort, and the need to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Finally, eye tracking can be a relatively expensive and technically complex method, which may limit its accessibility and feasibility for some researchers and clinicians. Overall, while eye tracking can be a valuable tool, it is important to carefully consider its limitations and potential drawbacks, and to employ rigorous methodological approaches to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
6. Strengths and potentials of eye tracking as a tool

Eye tracking is a powerful tool that offers several important strengths and potentials for research and clinical applications. One of the key strengths of eye tracking is its ability to provide objective, quantifiable measures of visual attention and information processing, which can offer valuable insights into cognitive and perceptual processes that are not easily accessible through self-report or behavioral measures alone. By tracking the movement and fixation of the eyes, researchers can gain a more detailed understanding of how individuals allocate their attention, process information, and make decisions in real-time. This can be particularly useful in the study of complex cognitive and social processes, such as reading, scene perception, and social interaction. Additionally, eye tracking can be used to study atypical development and psychopathology, as it can reveal unique patterns of attention and information processing that may be associated with various developmental disorders and mental health conditions. The potential of eye tracking extends beyond research, as it can also be used in clinical settings for diagnostic and intervention purposes, such as in the assessment and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and anxiety disorders. Furthermore, the continued technological advancements in eye tracking hardware and software have made it more accessible and user-friendly, expanding its potential applications in a wide range of fields, from human-computer interaction to marketing and consumer research. Overall, the strengths and potentials of eye tracking as a tool lie in its ability to provide objective, real-time insights into cognitive and perceptual processes, and its versatility in both research and applied settings.
7. Theoretical accounts of attentional bias in affective disorders

Theoretical accounts of attentional bias in affective disorders, such as anxiety and depression, have been a topic of significant interest in the field of psychology and cognitive neuroscience. These theories aim to explain the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the observed biases in attention and information processing that are often seen in individuals with affective disorders. One prominent theoretical account is the cognitive-motivational model, which posits that individuals with affective disorders exhibit an attentional bias towards threat-related or negative stimuli due to a heightened sensitivity to such information. This bias is thought to be driven by a combination of cognitive factors, such as selective attention and interpretation biases, as well as motivational factors, such as the desire to avoid or escape from perceived threats. Another theoretical account is the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis, which suggests that individuals with affective disorders initially exhibit a vigilance or heightened attention towards threat-related stimuli, but then subsequently avoid or disengage from such stimuli as a coping mechanism. This pattern of attention is thought to contribute to the maintenance of anxiety and depression symptoms. More recently, integrative models have been proposed that incorporate multiple cognitive and affective processes, such as emotion regulation, working memory, and executive control, to explain the complex and dynamic nature of attentional biases in affective disorders. These models emphasize the importance of considering the interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes in shaping attentional patterns. Overall, the theoretical accounts of attentional bias in affective disorders provide a framework for understanding the cognitive and motivational mechanisms that contribute to the observed biases in attention and information processing. These theories have important implications for the development of targeted interventions and the design of research studies aimed at elucidating the underlying processes involved in the etiology and maintenance of affective disorders.
8. Advancing theoretical accounts of attentional bias with eye tracking

The use of eye tracking has the potential to significantly advance our theoretical understanding of attentional bias in affective disorders, such as anxiety and depression. By providing a direct, objective measure of visual attention and information processing, eye tracking can offer valuable insights into the specific cognitive and attentional mechanisms that underlie these biases. One key way that eye tracking can contribute to advancing theoretical accounts is by allowing researchers to examine the temporal dynamics of attentional processes in greater detail. For example, eye tracking can reveal whether individuals with affective disorders exhibit an initial vigilance towards threat-related stimuli, followed by avoidance or disengagement, as proposed by the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. This level of temporal resolution can help to refine and test the predictions of existing theoretical models. Additionally, eye tracking can provide insights into the role of other cognitive processes, such as working memory and executive control, in shaping attentional biases. By examining patterns of eye movements during tasks that tap into these cognitive functions, researchers can gain a better understanding of how the interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes contributes to the observed biases in attention and information processing. Furthermore, the use of eye tracking in clinical populations can help to identify specific attentional markers or signatures that are associated with different affective disorders or subtypes of these disorders. This information can then be used to refine and expand existing theoretical models, potentially leading to the development of more targeted and effective interventions. Overall, the integration of eye tracking into the study of attentional bias in affective disorders has the potential to significantly advance our theoretical understanding of these phenomena. By providing a more detailed and objective measure of visual attention, eye tracking can help to elucidate the complex cognitive and motivational processes that underlie these biases, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the etiology and maintenance of affective disorders.