영어 보고서 (A way to raise peoples awarness about microplastics)

영어 보고서 (A way to raise people's awarness about microplastics)

문서 내 토픽

1. Why people don't believe in scientific facts

사람들은 시간이 지나고 기술이 발전함에 따라 과학자들의 주장에 대해 많은 의문을 가지게 됩니다. 사람들이 과학적이고 기술적으로 똑똑해지더라도 자신의 직관에 고집스럽게 매달립니다. 연구자들은 이러한 직관을 '순진한 삶'이라고 지칭합니다. 결국 사람들은 확증 편향을 가지고 있습니다. 확증 편향은 사람들이 자신의 기존 신념과 일치하는 정보를 찾거나 해석하려는 경향을 말합니다.
2. Confirmation bias attitude that people have about environmental and health problems caused by microplastics

연구 결과에 따르면, 일반 대중(21.1%), 지방 정부(20.3%), 중앙 정부(17.7%)가 해양 폐기물 관리 주체라고 생각하지만, 해양 관광객(27.5점), 해양 자원 이용 기업(33.3점), 일반 대중(36.2점)은 다른 주체에 비해 낮게 인식하고 있습니다. 즉, 일반 대중은 해양 폐기물 관리 주체나 책임 있는 행동 주체로 여겨지지 않는다고 믿고 있습니다. 응답자의 63%는 문제에 대한 인식 부족(25%)이나 참여 의지 부족(13%)보다는 실천 방법에 대한 지식 또는 정보 부족(49%)으로 인해 해양 폐기물 문제 해결을 위한 노력에 참여한 적이 없다고 응답했습니다.
3. Correlation between the threat of public service advertisements dealing with environmental pollution caused by microplastics and the change of attitude according to the degree

2001년 환경 보전 캠페인의 공포 소구 효과를 분석한 연구에서는 위협 수준이 다른 두 유형의 메시지를 제시하고 공포 반응의 차이를 관찰했으며, 다시 공포 수준에 따라 반응 행동 의도가 어떻게 달라지는지 살펴보았습니다. 이 연구는 환경 광고의 메시지가 위협 소구 형태로 제작될 때 공포 반응을 통해 설득 효과가 나타난다는 것을 확인했습니다. 또한 2002년 연구에서는 환경 오염의 피해 대상에 따른 위협 주장의 효과를 살펴보았습니다. 즉, 환경 오염이 누구에게나 위협이 된다는 전제 하에 개인 피해 호소, 타인/피해자 호소, 자연 피해자 호소 메시지를 각각 제작하고 세 집단 간 환경 문제 심각성 인식과 환경 행동 의도의 차이를 비교했습니다.

Easy AI와 토픽 톺아보기

1. Why people don't believe in scientific facts

There are several reasons why people may not believe in scientific facts. One key factor is the prevalence of confirmation bias, where people tend to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms their existing beliefs and worldviews. This can lead them to dismiss or discount scientific evidence that contradicts their preconceptions. Additionally, the increasing polarization of political and social discourse has made it more difficult for people to objectively evaluate scientific information, as they may view it through the lens of their ideological affiliations. The rise of misinformation and conspiracy theories on social media has also contributed to the erosion of public trust in science and scientific institutions. To address this issue, it is important to improve science communication, promote critical thinking, and foster a culture that values empirical evidence and the scientific method. This will require a multifaceted approach involving educators, policymakers, and the media to help the public better understand and appreciate the importance of scientific facts.
2. Confirmation bias attitude that people have about environmental and health problems caused by microplastics

The issue of confirmation bias regarding environmental and health problems caused by microplastics is a complex one. On one hand, there is a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating the widespread presence of microplastics in the environment and their potential negative impacts on human health and ecosystems. However, some individuals may be reluctant to accept these findings due to their preexisting beliefs or ideological leanings. For example, those with a strong attachment to the current economic and industrial model may be inclined to dismiss or downplay the evidence, as it could challenge the status quo and require significant changes to address the problem. Additionally, the complexity of the issue and the difficulty in directly observing the effects of microplastics may contribute to a sense of uncertainty or skepticism among some members of the public. To overcome this confirmation bias, it is crucial to improve public education and awareness about the scientific evidence, while also addressing the underlying social, economic, and political factors that may be shaping people's attitudes. This will require a multifaceted approach involving scientists, policymakers, and civil society organizations to ensure that the public has access to accurate, unbiased information and is empowered to make informed decisions about this critical environmental issue.
3. Correlation between the threat of public service advertisements dealing with environmental pollution caused by microplastics and the change of attitude according to the degree

The relationship between the threat level portrayed in public service advertisements (PSAs) about environmental pollution caused by microplastics and the resulting change in public attitudes is a complex and nuanced topic. On one hand, research has shown that fear-based messaging can be effective in motivating behavior change, as it taps into people's innate desire to avoid threats and protect themselves and their environment. Presenting the issue of microplastics as a serious and imminent threat could potentially spur individuals to take more concrete actions to reduce their plastic consumption and support policies aimed at addressing the problem. However, there is also a risk that overly alarmist or sensationalized messaging could backfire, leading to feelings of helplessness, denial, or even reactance, where people become more resistant to the message. Additionally, the degree of threat portrayed in the PSAs may need to be calibrated based on the target audience and their existing knowledge and attitudes about the issue. A more measured, informative approach that emphasizes the scientific evidence and practical solutions may be more effective in shifting public opinion, particularly among those who are more skeptical or resistant to fear-based appeals. Ultimately, the success of such PSAs in changing attitudes will likely depend on a careful balance between conveying the gravity of the problem and providing a sense of agency and empowerment to address it.

주제 연관 토픽을 확인해 보세요!