Samsung CEO Lee Jae Yong Receiving the Trial, Related President Park Impeachment in South Korea

목차

1. Corporate Social Responsibility Issue
2. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) issue in Samsung’s CEO’s, Lee’s Case
3. Facts relevant to decisions and affected stakeholders by Lee’s case
4. Alternative Proposals based on Deontological Ethics, Utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics Advice from financial professionals (Deontological)
5. Enhancing shareholders democracy (Utilitarian)
6. Social responsible investment (Virtue Ethics)
7. Consequences of the above Alternatives to Relevant Stakeholders Advice from financial professionals
8. Enhancing shareholders democracy
9. Social responsible investment
10. Common Ethical Theories Used in Business Utilitarianism ethical theory
11. Conclusion

본문내용

Corporate Social Responsibility Issue: Samsung CEO Lee Jae Yong Receiving the Trial, Related President Park Impeachment in Korea
Samsung’s CEO in South Korea has faced trials because of his participation in President Park Guen-hye impeachment. Lee is accused of having given bribes and donating huge amounts of money to Guen-hye in order to receive political favors. Furthermore, the CEO has been found guilty of hiding money and other assets overseas. As such, Lee’s actions affected major stakeholders including the stakeholders who had invested in the family run company (Horwitz, 2018). Therefore, Lee’s approaches to enhancing profits and market share of Samsung Korea were unethical because they were based on selfish gains, failure to exercise duties based on set policies or procedures, and failure to consider the needs of all stakeholders and surrounding communities.

참고 자료

Aleem, Z. (2018). Samsung's chief was just sent to prison by a South Korean court. Retrieved from
https://www.vox.com/world/2017/8/25/16202000/samsung-chief-prison-sentence
Audi, R. (2012). Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 273-291.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics, International Edition, Oxford University Press.
Dion, M. (2012). Are ethical theories relevant for ethical leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Horwitz, J. (2018). Samsung's leadership vacuum is over, and so is the illusion of corporate reform in Korea. Quartz. Retrieved from
https://qz.com/1198127/samsungs-lee-jae-yong-walks-free-after-court-suspends-his-sentence/
Jonsson, P. O. (2011). On utilitarianism vs virtue ethics as foundations of economic choice theory. Humanomics, 27(1), 24-40.
McCurry, J. (2018). Samsung heir sentenced to five years in jail after corruption conviction. the Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/25/samsung-heir-lee-jae-yong-found-guilty-of-corruption
van Dijk, H., van Engen, M., & Paauwe, J. (2012). Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 73-84.
Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 537-549.