BRONZE
BRONZE 등급의 판매자 자료

(영문)공기업의 민영화, The Impact of Privatization of Public Enterprise in Republic of Korea

공기업의 민영화가 미치는 영향. Privatization of Public Enterprise
27 페이지
워드
최초등록일 2015.08.31 최종저작일 2014.10
27P 미리보기
(영문)공기업의 민영화, The Impact of Privatization of Public Enterprise in Republic of Korea
  • 미리보기

    소개

    공기업의 민영화가 미치는 영향. Privatization of Public Enterprise

    목차

    CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background of the study
    1.2 Statement of the problem
    1.3 Research Objectives
    1.4 Limitation
    1.5 Significance of the study
    1.6 Scope of the study

    CHAPTER 2-LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Concept of Privatization
    2.2 The arguments related to the privatization of essential services
    2.3 History of Privatization in Korea

    CHAPTER 3-RESEARCH METHOLOGY
    3.1 Theoretical Framework
    3.1.1 Change role
    3.1.2 Poor management
    3.1.3The deficit finance
    3.2 Generation of Hypothesis
    3.3 Privatization Methods
    3.3.1Trade sales
    3.3.2 Share offerings
    3.3.3 Management-Employee Buyouts
    3.3.4 Corporatization
    3.4 Conclusion

    CHAPTER 4-AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE IMPACT OF PRIVATISATION
    4.1 Necessity for Privatization of Public Enterprises in Korea
    4.1.1 Loss of Reasons for Existence of Public Enterprises
    4.1.2 Presence of Significant Economic Inefficiencies
    4.1.3 Problems with the Government’s Opportunistic Interference and Policy Strategy
    4.2 Impacts of Privatization
    4.2.1 Impacts of Internal Management in Enterprise
    4.2.2 Impacts on Monopoly and Economic Power Concentration
    4.2.3 Impacts on Government
    4.2.4 Impacts on Capital Market and Securities Market
    4.2.5 Impacts on the Entire Nation

    CHAPTER 5 CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    5.1 Challenges of Privatization
    5.1.1 Economic power concentration
    5.1.2 Government’s deregulation and introduction of competition
    5.1.3 Split privatization
    5.2 Recommendations
    5.2.1 Strong commitment of the government.
    5.2.2 Expand the selection
    5.2.3 Diversification

    REFERENCES

    본문내용

    ABSTRACT
    Privatization is closely connected with diverse factors of the institutional history, political relations and international environments. That is to say, Privatization should be understood as outcomes of the clashes and struggles of the multiple subjects of privatization. However, Korea government tends to use privatization as a political purpose with little thought of important matters. As a result, recently, a lot of Korea people have doubt how privatization impacts public enterprise and give benefits to citizens. It seems that privatization is not the only answer and solves the current problems. Therefore, we need to understand the change process from government-owned enterprise to private and take a look at theories of privatization

    <중 략>

    5.2.3 Diversification
    For the improvement plan for privatization, the government divides public enterprises into a government enterprise, a government-funded institution, a government-owned institution, a government-funded institution-subsidiary, and a local public enterprise. Privatization can partially proceed by converting a government enterprise into a government-funded institution.

    참고자료

    · Bayliss, K. (2002). Privatization and Poverty: The distributional impact of Utility Privatization. Public service International research Unit. Working Paper No. 16 (1).
    · Birdsall, N.andNellis, J. (2003). Winners and losers: Assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World Development.
    · Oh, Myoung. and Larson, J. (2011) Digital development in Korea. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    · Kay, B.J. and Mayer, C. (1994).Privatization and Economic Performance.Oxford University press.
    · Adnan, F. (2005) Impact of Privatization on Economic Growth. Furman University, 14 (3), p.1-7.
    · Alkhafaji, A. (1993) Privatization: An Overview. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6 (3), p.1-24.
    · Hsueh-Liang, W. (2007) Exploring the sources of privatization-induced performance changes. Journal of Organizational Change Management , 20 (1), p.1-10.
    · Yoshihiro, T. (1998) Privatization of public enterprises and its problems in Japan. International Journal of Social Economics , 25 (2/3/4).
    · Gupta, S., Schiller, C., and Ma, H. (1999).Privatization, Social Impact, and Social Safety.
    · Nets.IMF Working Paper WP/99/69. Washington DC: IMF.
    · Birdsall, N.andNellis, J. (2003). Winners and losers: Assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World Development 13 (10): 1617-33.
    · Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1991).Economic Perspectives on Privatization.Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 5, No2 (Spring), 111-132.
    · Basu, P. (1994). Demystifying privatization in developing countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7(3), pp.44--55.
    · BRADFORD, S. (2001). George Miller, On Fairness and Efficiency: the privatisation of the public income over the past millennium, Bristol, The Policy Press, 2000, ix+ 470 pp.,pounds 55.00. Journal of Social Policy, 30(04), pp.735--774.
    · Kim, J. and Rowley, C. (2001).Managerial problems in Korea-Evidence from the nationalized industries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(2), pp.129--149.
    · M"uller, A. and L, e. (1997).The creation of a growth-oriented society in Korea. International Journal of Social Economics, 24(1/2/3), pp.178--189.
    · Piasecki, R. and Wolnicki, M. (2004).The evolution of development economics and globalization. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3), pp.300--314.
    · Toyama, Y. (1998). Privatization of public enterprises and its problems in Japan. International Journal of Social Economics, 25(2/3/4), pp.388--398.
    · BKL.co.kr (2003) Privatization of Public Enterprises in Korea. [online] Available at: http://www.bkl.co.kr/data/data1_47.pdf [Accessed: 12 may 2013].
    · etd.uwc (2013) AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE IMPACT OF THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES [online] Available at: http://etd.uwc.ac.za/usrfiles/modules/etd/docs/etd_init_3786_1174050576.pdf [Accessed: 24 may 2013].
    · knsi.org (2013) http://knsi.org/knsi/admin/work/works/ref_lwh_030114.pdf. [online] Available at: http://knsi.org/knsi/admin/work/works/ref_lwh_030114.pdf [Accessed: 12 may 2013].
    · Koreatimes.co.kr (2012) Economics of privatization. [online] Available at: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/bizfocus/2013/01/330_113655.html [Accessed: 1 Jun 2013].
    · lo.org (2013) The Impact of Decentralization and Privatization on Municipal Services . [online] Available at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb283/pdf/jmmsr.pdf [Accessed: 1 Jun 2013].
    · OECD.org (2013) Privatisation in the 21st Century: Recent Experiences of OECD Countries. [online] Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceofstate-ownedenterprises/48476423.pdf [Accessed: 1 Jun 2013].
    · Unescap.org (2013) PRIVATIZATION ISSUES. [online] Available at: http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/publications/tfs_pubs/pub_1855/pub_1855_ch4.pdf [Accessed: 11 may 2013].
    · Econ.worldbank.org, (2014). Data & Research. [online] Available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/ [Accessed 22 May. 2014].
    · Kwak Su il (1989). Investigation of Public enterprise about progress direction of Privatization.Korea Economic Research Institute (In Korean)
    · Nam ilchong (1999) Present and future of privatization of public enterprise. Korea SOEs Society (In Korean)
    · AnHoon (2004) Study improvement plan of privatization in Korea. Konkook University (In Korean)
    · Yu Hoon (1992) Theory of public enterprise.BoubMoonSa. (In Korean)
    · Lee ByoungHoon and Hwang Duk Soon (2000).Relationship between public and private in privatization.Korea Labour Institution. (In Korean)
  • 자료후기

    Ai 리뷰
    판매자가 제공한 자료는 체계적인 구성으로 되어 있어 복잡한 내용을 과제에 쉽게 활용 할 수 있었습니다. 앞으로도 이러한 좋은 자료들이 많이 등록되기를 기대합니다.
    왼쪽 화살표
    오른쪽 화살표
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 05월 22일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
8:27 오전