뿌쉬낀의 희곡 『보리스 고두노프』와 오태석의 희곡 『태』 비교 연구 (A Comparative Study on Pushkin's Boris Godunov and Oh Taesok's “Tae”)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국동서비교문학학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동서비교문학저널 / 29호 / 221 ~ 246페이지
· 저자명 : 안숙현

초록

Pushkin’s drama Boris Godunov and Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” dealt with similar tragic incidents of history, ‘the murder of heir to the throne and usurpation of the throne’. They broke away from teleological description method with the dominant view and interpretation about the past and tried to reveal the truth of history through multifaceted perspective and many different voices.
The drama Boris Godunov described the process, that Godunov, who assassinated the crown prince and ascended the throne, suffered from compunction and went to ruin by popular uprising, in 23 scenes. Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” have two main stories of King Sejo’s distress from of the murder of Danjong and ‘blood lines’ of Park Paengnyeon’s family. The history, Pushkin and Oh Taesok understood, is irrational world, that shows estrangement between reality and appearance. And this absurdity was repeated in history. Their dramas show the age․spatial difference, but the historical consciousness of two writers, who recognize the power problem of usurpation of the throne and historic events, are based on historical view of vicious circle with nihilism. But Pushkin’s historical consciousness have aspect of passive nihilism with no way out, but Oh Taeseok’s historical view shows aspect of active nihilism to overcome nihilism. And Oh Taeseok seeks for meaning and value of life and history in the ‘blood lines’ to overcome unreasonable historical situation.
Pushkin and Oh Taeseok regarded the history as absurd comedy. Pushkin showed avowedly the fact, the history is only a drama text as fiction. Oh Taeseok made historic events and facts into children’s play and sublimated nihilism of history to Dionysus’s play. Especially, they tried to newly interpret the fiction of history through the description method of crash montage.
Above all, their writing of history is for ethnicity understanding of their own country. Pushkin and Oh Taeseok emphasized, the power of will to lead the history is a ‘the public’ and ‘blood lines’. Nonetheless, Pushkin pessimistically predicted the future of russian public as like the crying baby, who was thrown on the ground in drama Boris Godunov. But Oh Taeseok insisted, the blood lines have positive meaning and value of life through the son’s life force of Park Paengnyeon’s family.

영어초록

Pushkin’s drama Boris Godunov and Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” dealt with similar tragic incidents of history, ‘the murder of heir to the throne and usurpation of the throne’. They broke away from teleological description method with the dominant view and interpretation about the past and tried to reveal the truth of history through multifaceted perspective and many different voices.
The drama Boris Godunov described the process, that Godunov, who assassinated the crown prince and ascended the throne, suffered from compunction and went to ruin by popular uprising, in 23 scenes. Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” have two main stories of King Sejo’s distress from of the murder of Danjong and ‘blood lines’ of Park Paengnyeon’s family. The history, Pushkin and Oh Taesok understood, is irrational world, that shows estrangement between reality and appearance. And this absurdity was repeated in history. Their dramas show the age․spatial difference, but the historical consciousness of two writers, who recognize the power problem of usurpation of the throne and historic events, are based on historical view of vicious circle with nihilism. But Pushkin’s historical consciousness have aspect of passive nihilism with no way out, but Oh Taeseok’s historical view shows aspect of active nihilism to overcome nihilism. And Oh Taeseok seeks for meaning and value of life and history in the ‘blood lines’ to overcome unreasonable historical situation.
Pushkin and Oh Taeseok regarded the history as absurd comedy. Pushkin showed avowedly the fact, the history is only a drama text as fiction. Oh Taeseok made historic events and facts into children’s play and sublimated nihilism of history to Dionysus’s play. Especially, they tried to newly interpret the fiction of history through the description method of crash montage.
Above all, their writing of history is for ethnicity understanding of their own country. Pushkin and Oh Taeseok emphasized, the power of will to lead the history is a ‘the public’ and ‘blood lines’. Nonetheless, Pushkin pessimistically predicted the future of russian public as like the crying baby, who was thrown on the ground in drama Boris Godunov. But Oh Taeseok insisted, the blood lines have positive meaning and value of life through the son’s life force of Park Paengnyeon’s family.

참고자료

· 없음