한국과 OECD국가들의 매복치 분류 및 발치 수가 조사 (Classification and comparison of impacted tooth extraction costs with OECD countries)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한치과의사협회
· 수록지 정보 : 대한치과의사협회지 / 62권 / 9호 / 546 ~ 554페이지
· 저자명 : 이채연, 서양경, 김현민, 김준영, 김형준, 허종기, 김재영

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the cost of impacted tooth extraction in Korea and some OECD countries and ultimately use it as basic data for the future revision of the relative value of national health insurance.
Materials and Methods: Costs of tooth extraction in Korea, Japan, the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ger many, France, and Canada were investigated. The costs were investigated through the dental association or association of oral and maxillofacial surgery in each country with literature review. In countries such as Korea, Japan, and Germany, which have a universal health insurance system at the national level, a survey was conducted based on a data collection listing standard tooth extraction cost. The costs were compared using the price level of each country and Big Mac Index.
Results: The classification and cost system for impacted tooth extraction were different in each country. Nevertheless, when comparing them by grouping them as similar as possible, the cost of impacted tooth extraction of Korea is lowest compared to some OECD countries. In addition, the cost is lowest even considering comparative price levels and the Big Mac index.
Conclusion: In conclusion, we believe that the fees for impacted tooth extraction need to be appropriately adjusted to a level similar to that of OECD countries, reflecting various factors. It is also believed that changes and approvals for a new the tooth extraction cost system are needed.

영어초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the cost of impacted tooth extraction in Korea and some OECD countries and ultimately use it as basic data for the future revision of the relative value of national health insurance.
Materials and Methods: Costs of tooth extraction in Korea, Japan, the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ger many, France, and Canada were investigated. The costs were investigated through the dental association or association of oral and maxillofacial surgery in each country with literature review. In countries such as Korea, Japan, and Germany, which have a universal health insurance system at the national level, a survey was conducted based on a data collection listing standard tooth extraction cost. The costs were compared using the price level of each country and Big Mac Index.
Results: The classification and cost system for impacted tooth extraction were different in each country. Nevertheless, when comparing them by grouping them as similar as possible, the cost of impacted tooth extraction of Korea is lowest compared to some OECD countries. In addition, the cost is lowest even considering comparative price levels and the Big Mac index.
Conclusion: In conclusion, we believe that the fees for impacted tooth extraction need to be appropriately adjusted to a level similar to that of OECD countries, reflecting various factors. It is also believed that changes and approvals for a new the tooth extraction cost system are needed.

참고자료

· 없음