• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

陶瓷를 통해 본 4세기 초 百濟와 東晉의 交流 (Exchanges between Baekje and Eastern Jin during the early 4th Century as viewed through Porcelains)

31 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.07.09 최종저작일 2011.02
31P 미리보기
陶瓷를 통해 본 4세기 초 百濟와 東晉의 交流
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 고려사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 韓國史學報 / 42호 / 7 ~ 37페이지
    · 저자명 : 안성진

    초록

    As evidenced by an entry pertaining to Baekje’s tribute to China dated from 372, exchanges between Baekje and China were opened. Some scholars have expressed doubts as to the veracity of the long accepted logic that it took Baekje, which had traded with China from early onwards, some 50 years to make contact with Eastern Jin following the establishment of the latter. The discovery of shards of porcelain emanating from Eastern Jin amongst Baekje relics has led some to claim that exchanges between Baekje and Eastern Jin may very well, have taken place prior to 372.
    This study begins by analyzing the characteristics of tribute and investiture that existed between Baekje and Eastern Jin. That being said, a look at historical materials shows that no formal tribute investiture relationship was ever established between Baekje and Eastern Jin.
    This study also focuses on the main actors within Eastern Jin when it comes to exchanges with Baekje. It is clear in the case of Baekje that the main actor involved in exchanges with other kingdoms was the king. While the conclusion could easily be reached that the emperor of Eastern Jin was at the forefront of exchanges with other countries the latter in reality wielded only limited power. In reality, the power belonged to the aristocracy. To this end, the Yangzhou area from which most of the porcelain of Eastern Jin emanated had long been under the control of the aristocrats that wielded real power at the time. Given the political situation that thus prevailed in Eastern Jin, it is highly possible that the exchanges with Baekje were led by a powerful local aristocrat rather than by the emperor of Eastern Jin. As such, while the porcelains of Eastern Jin were in fact introduced during the early and mid 4th century, such trade was not recorded in official historical material because it was not carried out through the emperor of Eastern Jin.
    There is a high likelihood that such trade between Baekje and Eastern Jin conducted in pursuit of concrete advantages, trade which did not go through the central government, was implemented from the very early stages of the relationship. As exchanges with other countries were regarded as the unique privilege of the royal family, the exchanges with Eastern Jin can be regarded as having helped to heighten the authority of the royal family of Baekje. Meanwhile, given the general state of uncertainty that surrounded the very existence of the state, there would have been no reason for Eastern Jin to forego engaging in lucrative trade with other countries. As such, it is estimated that the exchanges between Baekje and Eastern Jin had already started from around 330, or when Eastern Jin was founded and the internal rebellions had been suppressed.

    영어초록

    As evidenced by an entry pertaining to Baekje’s tribute to China dated from 372, exchanges between Baekje and China were opened. Some scholars have expressed doubts as to the veracity of the long accepted logic that it took Baekje, which had traded with China from early onwards, some 50 years to make contact with Eastern Jin following the establishment of the latter. The discovery of shards of porcelain emanating from Eastern Jin amongst Baekje relics has led some to claim that exchanges between Baekje and Eastern Jin may very well, have taken place prior to 372.
    This study begins by analyzing the characteristics of tribute and investiture that existed between Baekje and Eastern Jin. That being said, a look at historical materials shows that no formal tribute investiture relationship was ever established between Baekje and Eastern Jin.
    This study also focuses on the main actors within Eastern Jin when it comes to exchanges with Baekje. It is clear in the case of Baekje that the main actor involved in exchanges with other kingdoms was the king. While the conclusion could easily be reached that the emperor of Eastern Jin was at the forefront of exchanges with other countries the latter in reality wielded only limited power. In reality, the power belonged to the aristocracy. To this end, the Yangzhou area from which most of the porcelain of Eastern Jin emanated had long been under the control of the aristocrats that wielded real power at the time. Given the political situation that thus prevailed in Eastern Jin, it is highly possible that the exchanges with Baekje were led by a powerful local aristocrat rather than by the emperor of Eastern Jin. As such, while the porcelains of Eastern Jin were in fact introduced during the early and mid 4th century, such trade was not recorded in official historical material because it was not carried out through the emperor of Eastern Jin.
    There is a high likelihood that such trade between Baekje and Eastern Jin conducted in pursuit of concrete advantages, trade which did not go through the central government, was implemented from the very early stages of the relationship. As exchanges with other countries were regarded as the unique privilege of the royal family, the exchanges with Eastern Jin can be regarded as having helped to heighten the authority of the royal family of Baekje. Meanwhile, given the general state of uncertainty that surrounded the very existence of the state, there would have been no reason for Eastern Jin to forego engaging in lucrative trade with other countries. As such, it is estimated that the exchanges between Baekje and Eastern Jin had already started from around 330, or when Eastern Jin was founded and the internal rebellions had been suppressed.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“韓國史學報”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 프레시홍 - 추석
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 25일 목요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
1:25 오후