戴震의 고증학사상과 문학해석의 관계 연구 (Researching Relationship With DaiZhen's Ideology and Literature)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중어중문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중어중문학 / 61호 / 149 ~ 185페이지
· 저자명 : 진명호

초록

戴震之考证学在由宗经明道的思想下进行了所谓故训而明义理考释活动, 因此为了阐发圣贤之义理或文中的道, 他从具体的字句到对整个文章之间的关系有所顾及而发明创新的体例。戴震他持着这种宗经明道的态度, 不仅对经书的字句和思想内容进行考实, 也对文学作品考究字句以及解释其内容作了详细地考实。他在训诂考据思想上主张义理、考据、辞章的统一, 以此之由强调对考据学问由声音和文字以求训诂, 由训诂以寻义理而要求不能空凭胸臆求于古经, 所以他明道的治学态度在文学领域也有颇一致的学问风范。就是说, 戴震认为圣人的道居于本，文学虽然处于末端, 但文学作品的内容源于经义, 因其二者体制不同之故而不会造成两种截然不同的义理, 所以在本末同一的观念上经书和文学作品的旨意是要一致的, 如他训诂考据的『诗经』和屈塬的赋有其儒家道德之内涵。对此儒家经义之明, 戴震就由字通其道的方式考实, 或经典或文学皆能利用小学训诂考据, 这就考据和义理能兼容, 正如他的学问说事实在前, 我说是对者，他人不能强辨而非之。吾所谓非者, 他人不能强辞而说那是对的。我们如果对戴震的学问方法说那是不对的，我们不能说圣人的道使对的，因为实事求是的考证是不能改经书内容的。如六书九数及典章制度之学是使用的。圣人的道是虚的，虚理在前, 以考证学解释虚的道，这可谓是明道的。戴震的客观学问和文学也是一样以考证而明于诗意。

영어초록

DaiZhen is a well-known scholar of the mid-Qing period. He presented a new way to interpret the scriptures. In other words, he renewed the way to interpret old sentences. Historically, researches on scriptures have caused many different interpretations. However, DaiZhen's thought of interpreting the scriptures was objective. This was the way to research the words and pronunciations.
Languages change its meaning all the time. Ancient sentences are too old to know their clear meaning. Therefore, DaiZhen researched ancient sentences with their words and pronunciations. This way of researching is the most objective. DaiZhen researched chinese ancient philosophy and literary works with this way. But, from now, there were few researches about his literatures. DaiZhen left many resources in literature. Especially, he researched the meaning of "Shijing" and "Chuci".
He represented a new ideology when he researches literatures. First, writers should learn scriptures' meaning. Second, literary works should reveal the meaning of scriptures. Third, the meaning of scriptures, studying historical evidence, sentences should be unified. Fourth, to research ancient sentences, we should know the meaning of the of the words. Fifth, literary works can be interpreted by interpreting the words. Along those lines, DaiZhen interpreted literary works by the words. This way has advantages and disadvantages at once. But, there is a strong feature that made philosophy and literature together.

참고자료

· 없음