• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

1930-40년대 경성지역 대중교통의 문제점과 대책 (Problems and Measures of the Public Transportation in Gyeongseong area in 1930s-1940s)

39 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.27 최종저작일 2013.02
39P 미리보기
1930-40년대 경성지역 대중교통의 문제점과 대책
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 서울시립대학교 서울학연구소
    · 수록지 정보 : 서울학연구 / 50호 / 145 ~ 183페이지
    · 저자명 : 최인영, 김제정

    초록

    In 1920s, there came into being a competition system between the tram and the bus in line with rapid growth of the road transportation business but the Railway Bureau controlled the traffic focusing on railway and tram. Gyeongseong Electric company relocated the buses where tram lines were not available upon taken over of the bus business in the year 1933-1934. As a result, the public transportation in Gyeongseong area was reorganized focused on the tram. However, there occurred a shortage of public transportation in Gyeongseong area in 1930s. The phenomenon of rush hour was occurred in the early part in 1930s, and the traffic difficulty became heavier after the traffic control in 1934 and expansion of administrative district of Gyeongseong municipal gov’t in 1934. The major cause of the traffic congestion was the rapidly increased number of passengers. The average number of passengers of the tram & bus had increased to about 130,000 persons from 100,000 persons per day for 5-6 years after municipal bus started operation in 1928 indicating the increase of passengers merely 30,000 passengers, but from 1934 to 1940 after reorganization of public traffic focused on the tram the passengers increased to 3 folds to 440,000 persons from 150,000 persons indicated the increase as many as 280,000 persons.
    The reason of rapid increase of passengers was; First, the increasing trend of populations year by year in Gyeongseong area. Second, the effect of traffic fare decrease caused by the traffic fare system change. Third, the increased commuters of employee & student. However, the vehicles and capacity of the facilities of Gyeongseong Electric company could not catch up with the then increasing passengers. There lacked trams & buses, furthermore their route as well could not be extended more or less, and even the fuel of gasoline was also restricted. This was on the one hand due to the profit-oriented policy of Gyeongseong Electric company, but the possibility of its improvement was further decreased under the war time controlled economy.
    In September 1939, ‘The countermeasure committee of Tram/Bus Problem’ was organized by the Member of Gyeongseong Municipal Assembly and criticized Gyeongseong Electric company of their profit-oriented management policy. Gyeongseong Municipal gov’t requested the operation of express-bus comparable to tram routes to digest rapidly increased passengers during rush our time, which was a reemergence of parallel operations of bus & tram routes merely for 5-6 years to mitigate traffic difficulty since the tram focused traffic system was introduced. In March 1940, the semi-municipalization of public transport was raised by Gyeongseong Municipal Assembly which was the reemergence of the movement of municipalization of Gyeongseong Electric company in early 1930s.
    In August 1939, and in December 1939 the downtown circle line of tram was introduced in the downtown area where passengers concentrated during rush hour and the express-bus was introduced by Gyeongseong Electric company respectively, but it could not contribute to the mitigation of traffic difficulty due to their separate fare system. In April 1940, an express tram was operated, and in December 1944 the methods of prohibition of transfer during rush hour and removal of seats in the tram etc. were added.
    But such measures were merely a temporary measures rather than the fundamental solutions for the problem. This was due to the passive attitude of profit-oriented Gyeongseong Electric company, and the fundamental solution was next to impossible under the war controlled economy. Also this was a measure favorable to Gyeongseong Electric company at the expense of local residents. Finally, the sacrifice to mitigate the traffic congestion was left intact to the residents of Gyeongseong municipal city through promotion of walking short distance or reducing time for getting on & off by observing strict traffic ethics.

    영어초록

    In 1920s, there came into being a competition system between the tram and the bus in line with rapid growth of the road transportation business but the Railway Bureau controlled the traffic focusing on railway and tram. Gyeongseong Electric company relocated the buses where tram lines were not available upon taken over of the bus business in the year 1933-1934. As a result, the public transportation in Gyeongseong area was reorganized focused on the tram. However, there occurred a shortage of public transportation in Gyeongseong area in 1930s. The phenomenon of rush hour was occurred in the early part in 1930s, and the traffic difficulty became heavier after the traffic control in 1934 and expansion of administrative district of Gyeongseong municipal gov’t in 1934. The major cause of the traffic congestion was the rapidly increased number of passengers. The average number of passengers of the tram & bus had increased to about 130,000 persons from 100,000 persons per day for 5-6 years after municipal bus started operation in 1928 indicating the increase of passengers merely 30,000 passengers, but from 1934 to 1940 after reorganization of public traffic focused on the tram the passengers increased to 3 folds to 440,000 persons from 150,000 persons indicated the increase as many as 280,000 persons.
    The reason of rapid increase of passengers was; First, the increasing trend of populations year by year in Gyeongseong area. Second, the effect of traffic fare decrease caused by the traffic fare system change. Third, the increased commuters of employee & student. However, the vehicles and capacity of the facilities of Gyeongseong Electric company could not catch up with the then increasing passengers. There lacked trams & buses, furthermore their route as well could not be extended more or less, and even the fuel of gasoline was also restricted. This was on the one hand due to the profit-oriented policy of Gyeongseong Electric company, but the possibility of its improvement was further decreased under the war time controlled economy.
    In September 1939, ‘The countermeasure committee of Tram/Bus Problem’ was organized by the Member of Gyeongseong Municipal Assembly and criticized Gyeongseong Electric company of their profit-oriented management policy. Gyeongseong Municipal gov’t requested the operation of express-bus comparable to tram routes to digest rapidly increased passengers during rush our time, which was a reemergence of parallel operations of bus & tram routes merely for 5-6 years to mitigate traffic difficulty since the tram focused traffic system was introduced. In March 1940, the semi-municipalization of public transport was raised by Gyeongseong Municipal Assembly which was the reemergence of the movement of municipalization of Gyeongseong Electric company in early 1930s.
    In August 1939, and in December 1939 the downtown circle line of tram was introduced in the downtown area where passengers concentrated during rush hour and the express-bus was introduced by Gyeongseong Electric company respectively, but it could not contribute to the mitigation of traffic difficulty due to their separate fare system. In April 1940, an express tram was operated, and in December 1944 the methods of prohibition of transfer during rush hour and removal of seats in the tram etc. were added.
    But such measures were merely a temporary measures rather than the fundamental solutions for the problem. This was due to the passive attitude of profit-oriented Gyeongseong Electric company, and the fundamental solution was next to impossible under the war controlled economy. Also this was a measure favorable to Gyeongseong Electric company at the expense of local residents. Finally, the sacrifice to mitigate the traffic congestion was left intact to the residents of Gyeongseong municipal city through promotion of walking short distance or reducing time for getting on & off by observing strict traffic ethics.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 01월 23일 금요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
4:52 오전