对话中“嗯”的积极应对功能考察 - 以在韩汉语教材现状考察及教材编排为中心 - (Research on the Active Response Functions of "en(嗯)" in Chinese Dialogues)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중국어교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국어교육과 연구 / 35호 / 89 ~ 108페이지
· 저자명 : 유우, 변관식, 변관식

초록

人们在习得第二外语的时候，总是在摸索寻找规律。若是有一把万能金钥匙，便在学习的路上会减轻很多的时间和精力。本人在平时看电视和与人沟通时发现，经常我们用于应答的一些用语中，就有这么一个应答语可具有极大的包容性，可以让习得者在应答时不用苦思冥想用哪个词合适就可在短时间之内作答。通过对『欢乐颂』第一季的调查中发现，剧中下方的台词中全程无“嗯”字样，但在主人公对话的实际出现率却很高。在考察前人研究时发现，对于“嗯”的研究寥寥无几。或许是“嗯”过于口语化的缘故，在论文中探讨的几率并不很高，但从现实使用率的角度上来看，“嗯”确实有探讨和研究的必要。结合学者们的研究后总结出“嗯”的四种积极应对功能类型，并与我们熟知的“是、好、对、行”分别进行替换，可知“嗯”在积极应对功能下，不仅可以与这四者替换且四者相互无法替换的时候，“嗯”也可以首当其冲。随后对目前在韩的三本汉语教材进行了整理分析，发现三本教材，都极少的出现“嗯“。即使出现了，也都是“嗯”的四种积极应对功能的其中一种类型，且未对此进行任何的说明。如此具有包容性的应答语没有在汉语教材中崭露头角，稍有惋惜。若而后对在韩教材在这方面有所提及，或对更多习得者有更多的帮助。

영어초록

When people learn a second foreign language, they always try to explore rules. If there was a universal golden key, it would save a lot of time and energy on learning methods. The author finds one word among some often used words to respond when watching TV and communicating with others. It is such an inclusive word that people can use to answer in a short time without thinking too hard about the word choice. Through the investigation of the first season of "Ode to Joy", there seems to be no "en(嗯)" in the subtitle at the bottom of the screen, yet there is quite a high appearance rate in the actual dialogues between the protagonists. Through prior study, it has been discovered that there seems to be very little research on "en" perhaps because the word is too colloquial. Although the probability of discussion in essays is not very high, "en" is indeed necessary for discussion and research from the perspective of the actual usage rate. Based on the research of previous scholars, this research has summarized four types of active response functions of "en". When replaced with the well-known "shi(是)", "hao(好)", "dui(对)", and "xing(行)", “en” has been confirmed to be able to replace the above four within the frame of the four active response functions and sometimes bear the brunt. Moreover, the author has sorted and analyzed the three Chinese-teaching textbooks currently used in South Korea, finding that the word “en” rarely appears. Even if it does, it still acts as one of the four functions and there is no explanation about it. It can be considered a pity that such an inclusive response word has not emerged in Chinese-teaching textbooks. It may be more helpful to learners if “en” could be mentioned more.

참고자료

· 없음