‘V在NL’구조의 의미 도출에 관한 연구 ― 중‧고급단계 학습자 실험연구를 중심으로 (A Study on the Meaning of 'V在NL' Structure)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국어문학연구회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국어문학논집 / 122호 / 217 ~ 234페이지
· 저자명 : 박교리

초록

Identifying the exact meaning when learning a foreign language and converting it into proper native language expression are very important for understanding and utilization.preposition which comes into contact with the early stages of learning in Chinese, forms a “在+ place noun (NL)”structure, which can be located in front of the verb predicate, and behind the verb predicate, and is used as various sentence components such as Korean, adverbial, and bore.
In particular, the“S在NLV”structure responds to the“-에"and“-에서"survey, which functions as a adverb in Korean, and is the same as the Korean word order, so it is highly preferred and utilized by Korean learners.
On the other hand, I think that the“SV在NL" structure is the slowest of the three structures using“在NL’ and is somewhat lacking in the acquisition situation and utilization. The“V在NL”structure is interchangeable with the“在NLV”structure, but it is not always possible, and there are several characteristics that have only this structure.
In this regard, we hope that learners will understand and utilize the characteristics and effects of the“V在NL"structure, namely, its syntactic, semantic, and discourse functions and effects, and to this end, we will first examine what problems the learners have and verify the differences when comparing them with Chinese speakers.
To verify the meaning of the subjects, they chose a Korean translation method and selected 30 Chinese-language presentations according to the five conditions.
As a result of the experiment, it is judged that Korean subjects in the middle and high levels are relatively aware of the meaning of the“V在NL”structure.
However, it does not understand the conceptual difference, and it replaces the concept of meaning in the mother tongue, which can be considered the core of the“V在NL”structure. In addition, we could see that there was a lack of understanding of the meaning characteristics of“NL”and its role in the structure.
Learning verbs is the key to accurately recognize the meaning of the“V在NL"structure. I think more careful attention is needed in the educational field so that learners can understand and utilize various meanings of the verb.
At the same time, teachers should help learners understand the differences between the two structures accurately so that they can use the“V在NL”structure properly, away from the uniform use of the“在NLV”structure, which is far more favored. Through this, it should provide opportunities to derive accurate Korean meaning, better suited to the speaker's intentions, and to carry out various and timely speech functions.

영어초록

Identifying the exact meaning when learning a foreign language and converting it into proper native language expression are very important for understanding and utilization.preposition which comes into contact with the early stages of learning in Chinese, forms a “在+ place noun (NL)”structure, which can be located in front of the verb predicate, and behind the verb predicate, and is used as various sentence components such as Korean, adverbial, and bore.
In particular, the“S在NLV”structure responds to the“-에"and“-에서"survey, which functions as a adverb in Korean, and is the same as the Korean word order, so it is highly preferred and utilized by Korean learners.
On the other hand, I think that the“SV在NL" structure is the slowest of the three structures using“在NL’ and is somewhat lacking in the acquisition situation and utilization. The“V在NL”structure is interchangeable with the“在NLV”structure, but it is not always possible, and there are several characteristics that have only this structure.
In this regard, we hope that learners will understand and utilize the characteristics and effects of the“V在NL"structure, namely, its syntactic, semantic, and discourse functions and effects, and to this end, we will first examine what problems the learners have and verify the differences when comparing them with Chinese speakers.
To verify the meaning of the subjects, they chose a Korean translation method and selected 30 Chinese-language presentations according to the five conditions.
As a result of the experiment, it is judged that Korean subjects in the middle and high levels are relatively aware of the meaning of the“V在NL”structure.
However, it does not understand the conceptual difference, and it replaces the concept of meaning in the mother tongue, which can be considered the core of the“V在NL”structure. In addition, we could see that there was a lack of understanding of the meaning characteristics of“NL”and its role in the structure.
Learning verbs is the key to accurately recognize the meaning of the“V在NL"structure. I think more careful attention is needed in the educational field so that learners can understand and utilize various meanings of the verb.
At the same time, teachers should help learners understand the differences between the two structures accurately so that they can use the“V在NL”structure properly, away from the uniform use of the“在NLV”structure, which is far more favored. Through this, it should provide opportunities to derive accurate Korean meaning, better suited to the speaker's intentions, and to carry out various and timely speech functions.

참고자료

· 없음