≪論語⋅學而≫ 11章 해석에 관한 小考 ‒ ‘其’자를 중심으로 ‒ (A study on the interpretation of the eleventh chapter in Xue-er article, in the Analects of Confucius ― Focused on the interpretation of ‘Qi(其)’ ―)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 전북대학교 인문학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 건지인문학 / 22호 / 139 ~ 161페이지
· 저자명 : 박세늬

초록

≪论语≫是历代以来广为传阅的经典, 也是解释上存在颇多争议的著作 之一｡ 因为各篇的所有章节并没有形成同一脉络｡ 然而, 即便如此, 从书的 整体来看, 虽然≪论语≫不是孔子直接记录的, 但至少孔子直接谈及的部分, 也应该贯穿前后, 符合孔子这一人物的思想及言语的本意进行解释｡ 本论文将不拘于朱熹的解释, 试图对≪论语≫中存在争议的句子进行正 确的解释｡ 历代以来, 研究≪论语≫注释上存在争议的论文众多, 无法一一 列举｡ 然而＜学而＞11章即便存在争议, 但韩国国内还没有出现相关的研究 论文｡ 因此, 本论文将对＜学而＞11章存在注释争议的部分进行考察｡ 其原 文如下：“子曰‚ 父在‚ 觀其志‚ 父沒‚ 觀其行‚ 三年無改於父之道 可謂孝 矣.” 争论的焦点在于＜学而＞11章中2次出现的“其”字｡ 关于该“其”字大致 分为两种解释｡ 以宋代朱熹为始的众多学者, 将其视为“儿子”, 认为＜学 而＞11章是“孔子的观人法”｡ 还有部分学者认为“其”字是“父亲”的意思｡ 笔 者根据这些学者的主张综合孔子的观人法与孝思想考察后, 得出的结论是 “其”应该解释为“父亲”｡ 如果解释为儿子, 在语法上虽然不存在问题, 但是 与后面的句子“三年…”在语序上衔接不自然｡ 当解释为父亲的时候, 与≪中 庸≫中提到的“夫孝者, 善繼人之志, 善述人之事者也｡”这一章句也一脉相通 ｡ 该章的主题“孝”或“孝子”也得以明确体现｡

영어초록

The Analects of Confucius is a classic widely circulated throughout the ages, and one of the most controversial works in interpretation. Because all the chapters of each chapter do not form the same vein. However, as a whole, though Confucius did not record it directly, at least the parts he talked about should be explained before and after, in accordance with the thoughts and words of Confucius. This paper will try to explain the contentious sentences in the text without any reference to Zhu Xi's explanation. Since ancient times, there have been many controversial papers in the explanatory notes, so it is impossible to list them one by one by one. However, even though there is controversy in Chapter 11, there is no research paper in Korea. Therefore, this paper is going to examine the contentious section of Chapter 11 of Learning and Learning. The original text reads: "The son is the father, the father is not the father, the father is not the father, the father has not changed his ways for three years, so it is called filial piety." The focus of the debate is on the character "其" which appears twice in Chapter 11. The word "其"is roughly divided into two interpretations. Many scholars, beginning with Zhu Xi in the Song Dynasty, regard it as a son, and regard Chapter 11 as the "Confucius' Observation Law". Others think that the word '字' means 'father'. Based on the opinions of these scholars, the author concludes that "it" should be interpreted as "father". If it's interpreted as a son, there's no grammatical problem, but it's not natural to connect with the following sentence "three years" in the alphabet. When interpreting his father as a father, he said, "The filial piety of the husband, the desire to be good to follow others, is a good account of people's affairs."This chapter is also connected with each other. The chapter's theme of filial piety or filial piety is also clearly reflected.

참고자료

· 없음