• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

국교정상화 이후 한일경제협력 논의의 전개과정 (Developments of the Discussions about the Korea-Japan Economic Cooperation since the Normalization of the Diplomatic Relations between the Two Countries)

29 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.22 최종저작일 2010.02
29P 미리보기
국교정상화 이후 한일경제협력 논의의 전개과정
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 수선사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 사림 / 35호 / 281 ~ 309페이지
    · 저자명 : 이현진

    초록

    This research is designed to understand the meanings and limitations of the Korea-Japan economic cooperation policies in the early phase of the Park Chung-hee administration through the specific review soft he developments of discussions about Korea-Japan economic cooperation over the period during which the bilateral negotiations to normalize the diplomatic relations between the two countries had been proceeded. To this end, the diplomatic documents which have recently been declassified by the Korean and the Japanese governments have been referenced.
    Japan had been passive in participating in the discussions about the overseas economic cooperation activities by the middle of 1960s. Although the country had been urged to assume proactive roles in the East Asian region following its admission to the OECD and its Development Assistance Committee and the deployment of new foreign policies of by the U.S., Japan failed to proactively pursue activities for economic cooperation with Korea due to its internal economic issues. Thus, during the process of discussing claim so implementing measures to pursue economic cooperation with Korea, Japan defined that the claims are more collaborations for economic purposes than offering compensations and had emphasized the principle that the funds claimed must be evenly distributed over ten years thorough the execution of yearly plans.
    To the contrary, the Korean government intended to use the aids from Japan to cover the decreased amount of the U.S.aids. To this end, the Korean government had focused on the increase in amount of the initial funds and the early execution of the funds by emphasizing that the aids are literally claim sand by highlighting the features of the claims.The approach represented the Korean government’s needs to continue the pursuit of the economic development plans and to create the tangible results from the use of the funds claimed.
    Based on the argument that the claims are a form of economic cooperation, Japan even tried hard to have its hands in the selection of projects as well as the allocation of funds to projects. However, the Korean government, which placed its focuses on the computation of total amounts on the condition that it shall use the funds claimed to cover the shortage of foreign capitals needed, lost the leading position in the discussion of the plans to execute the initial claims by failing to allocate project areas in alignment with the economic development plans according to the characteristics of the funds. In addition, internal confusions between the delegation to discuss the claims and the Korean Embassy in Japan had provided excuses for the distrust of the economic diplomacy of the Korean government.

    영어초록

    This research is designed to understand the meanings and limitations of the Korea-Japan economic cooperation policies in the early phase of the Park Chung-hee administration through the specific review soft he developments of discussions about Korea-Japan economic cooperation over the period during which the bilateral negotiations to normalize the diplomatic relations between the two countries had been proceeded. To this end, the diplomatic documents which have recently been declassified by the Korean and the Japanese governments have been referenced.
    Japan had been passive in participating in the discussions about the overseas economic cooperation activities by the middle of 1960s. Although the country had been urged to assume proactive roles in the East Asian region following its admission to the OECD and its Development Assistance Committee and the deployment of new foreign policies of by the U.S., Japan failed to proactively pursue activities for economic cooperation with Korea due to its internal economic issues. Thus, during the process of discussing claim so implementing measures to pursue economic cooperation with Korea, Japan defined that the claims are more collaborations for economic purposes than offering compensations and had emphasized the principle that the funds claimed must be evenly distributed over ten years thorough the execution of yearly plans.
    To the contrary, the Korean government intended to use the aids from Japan to cover the decreased amount of the U.S.aids. To this end, the Korean government had focused on the increase in amount of the initial funds and the early execution of the funds by emphasizing that the aids are literally claim sand by highlighting the features of the claims.The approach represented the Korean government’s needs to continue the pursuit of the economic development plans and to create the tangible results from the use of the funds claimed.
    Based on the argument that the claims are a form of economic cooperation, Japan even tried hard to have its hands in the selection of projects as well as the allocation of funds to projects. However, the Korean government, which placed its focuses on the computation of total amounts on the condition that it shall use the funds claimed to cover the shortage of foreign capitals needed, lost the leading position in the discussion of the plans to execute the initial claims by failing to allocate project areas in alignment with the economic development plans according to the characteristics of the funds. In addition, internal confusions between the delegation to discuss the claims and the Korean Embassy in Japan had provided excuses for the distrust of the economic diplomacy of the Korean government.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“사림”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 17일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
10:21 오후