한국어 종성 파열음 탈락에 나타난 중간언어의 언어적 변이 연구 - 중국어권 고급학습자를 중심으로 - (Linguistic Variation in L2 Korean Phonology : Focusing on Coda Plosives Deletion)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국문법교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 문법 교육 / 43권 / 161 ~ 204페이지
· 저자명 : 왕흠범

초록

The present study aims to investigate linguistic variation patterns of coda plosives deletion in L2 Korean, for which academic presentation data of Chinese-L1 advanced learners were collected in order to identify the linguistic environment that promotes or inhibits coda plosives deletion. The linguistic environment can be divided into two categories: phonological environment and grammatical environment. The former one consists of ‘coda plosive type’, ‘following phoneme type’, and ‘preceding vowel type’, while the latter one includes ‘grammatical condition’ and ‘following morpheme type’.
In accordance with the results of the variable rule analysis, the ‘learner’ factor group had the greatest influence on coda plosives deletion, followed by ‘coda plosive type’ and ‘following phoneme type’. In the meantime, ‘following morpheme type’ was found to be an independent variable with the weakest effect.
Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability according to the phonological environment, firstly, the learner had the highest possibility of deleting [t┐] but could properly pronounce [p┐] in various linguistic environments. Second, coda plosives are most probably deleted if a nasal or a stop follows. It is proved that glottals and monophthongs or w-diphthongs are the favorable environment for learners to properly pronounce coda plosives, with the deletion being suppressed. Third, when the syllable nucleus is a low vowel, the probability of coda plosive deletion was highest, with the remaining factors (i.e. vowel types) suppressing the deletion.
Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability based on the grammatical environment, first, ‘inside a phonological word’ and ‘outside a phonological word’ were proved to be deletion-promoting factors, while the deletion probability was the lowest if the coda plosive is placed inside a simple word. Second, among the ‘following morpheme type’ factor group, although there is only the ‘vocabulary morpheme’ factor proving deletion, what can be shown is that learners almost similarly deleted in all factors due to the lowest factor weight range among the six factor groups.

영어초록

The present study aims to investigate linguistic variation patterns of coda plosives deletion in L2 Korean, for which academic presentation data of Chinese-L1 advanced learners were collected in order to identify the linguistic environment that promotes or inhibits coda plosives deletion. The linguistic environment can be divided into two categories: phonological environment and grammatical environment. The former one consists of ‘coda plosive type’, ‘following phoneme type’, and ‘preceding vowel type’, while the latter one includes ‘grammatical condition’ and ‘following morpheme type’.
In accordance with the results of the variable rule analysis, the ‘learner’ factor group had the greatest influence on coda plosives deletion, followed by ‘coda plosive type’ and ‘following phoneme type’. In the meantime, ‘following morpheme type’ was found to be an independent variable with the weakest effect.
Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability according to the phonological environment, firstly, the learner had the highest possibility of deleting [t┐] but could properly pronounce [p┐] in various linguistic environments. Second, coda plosives are most probably deleted if a nasal or a stop follows. It is proved that glottals and monophthongs or w-diphthongs are the favorable environment for learners to properly pronounce coda plosives, with the deletion being suppressed. Third, when the syllable nucleus is a low vowel, the probability of coda plosive deletion was highest, with the remaining factors (i.e. vowel types) suppressing the deletion.
Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability based on the grammatical environment, first, ‘inside a phonological word’ and ‘outside a phonological word’ were proved to be deletion-promoting factors, while the deletion probability was the lowest if the coda plosive is placed inside a simple word. Second, among the ‘following morpheme type’ factor group, although there is only the ‘vocabulary morpheme’ factor proving deletion, what can be shown is that learners almost similarly deleted in all factors due to the lowest factor weight range among the six factor groups.

참고자료

· 없음