흰쥐의 감염된 전층피부결손에서 은 함유 드레싱제제의 Staphylococcus aureus 및 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 균주에 대한 효과의 비교 (Comparative Efficacy of Silver Containing Dressing Materials to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Infected Full Thickness Skin Wound in the Rat)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한성형외과학회
· 수록지 정보 : Archives of Plastic Surgery / 36권 / 4호 / 372 ~ 379페이지
· 저자명 : 이종훈, 김동규, 이원미, 채정돈

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on antibacterial activities and wound healing effect of silver containing dressings with which of Betadine against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Methods: One full thickness skin defects in rats(n=72) were developed on the back and were given rise to infection with S. aureus(n=36) and P. aeruginosa(n=36). The 72 mice were divided into 6 groups : Acticoat®, Aquacel®-Ag, Medifoam silver®, Polymen silver®, Ilvadon® and Betadine(control group) dressing groups. Five silver containing dressings and Betadine were assesed on infected wound. Measurement of wound size change, bacterial colonies count and histologic findings was applied. Antibacterial activity was analyzed with bacterial restricted zone in Mueller Hinton agar.
Results: On S. aureus, wound size was more decreased in all treated groups as compared with betadine, however Ilvadon® was less decreased on P. aeruginosa. In histologic findings, experimental group showed more effective findings than others on S. aureus, however on P. aeruginosa, which was showed similar. Acticoat® was best effective in wound healing against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The bacterial colonies count was increased in all treated groups except Acticoat® as compared with the control group on S. aureus, which was decreased in Acticoat® and Ilvadon® group on P. aeruginosa. There were not statistical differences. The restricted zone was shown in Mueller - Hinton agar of all groups except Medifoam silver® group on S. aureus, which was shown of all groups on P. aeruginosa. There were statistical differences.
Conclusion: This study suggests that silver containing dressings may have not better potential than Betadine in assisting management of wounds at risk of infection on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. However, which have better antibacterial activity on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

영어초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on antibacterial activities and wound healing effect of silver containing dressings with which of Betadine against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Methods: One full thickness skin defects in rats(n=72) were developed on the back and were given rise to infection with S. aureus(n=36) and P. aeruginosa(n=36). The 72 mice were divided into 6 groups : Acticoat®, Aquacel®-Ag, Medifoam silver®, Polymen silver®, Ilvadon® and Betadine(control group) dressing groups. Five silver containing dressings and Betadine were assesed on infected wound. Measurement of wound size change, bacterial colonies count and histologic findings was applied. Antibacterial activity was analyzed with bacterial restricted zone in Mueller Hinton agar.
Results: On S. aureus, wound size was more decreased in all treated groups as compared with betadine, however Ilvadon® was less decreased on P. aeruginosa. In histologic findings, experimental group showed more effective findings than others on S. aureus, however on P. aeruginosa, which was showed similar. Acticoat® was best effective in wound healing against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The bacterial colonies count was increased in all treated groups except Acticoat® as compared with the control group on S. aureus, which was decreased in Acticoat® and Ilvadon® group on P. aeruginosa. There were not statistical differences. The restricted zone was shown in Mueller - Hinton agar of all groups except Medifoam silver® group on S. aureus, which was shown of all groups on P. aeruginosa. There were statistical differences.
Conclusion: This study suggests that silver containing dressings may have not better potential than Betadine in assisting management of wounds at risk of infection on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. However, which have better antibacterial activity on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

참고자료

· 없음