한국어 대칭구문의 중국어 대응형식 연구 (A Contrastive Analysis of the Symmetric Constructions between Korean and Chinese)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중앙대학교 외국학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 외국학연구 / 40호 / 35 ~ 56페이지
· 저자명 : 림문연, 김선희

초록

In Korean, the symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] can be replaced by [NP1와 NP2가 V] construction, [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction or [NP1가 NP2를 V] construction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the corresponding symmetric construction relation between Korean and Chinese. For that, each pattern of the Korean symmetric construction was applied to that of Chinese and investigated how each set of corresponding construction should be interpreted. The findings are as follows: First, in Korean, the substitution of [NP1가 NP2와 V] by [NP1와 NP2가 V] altered the property of nouns: NP1 as in [NP1가 NP2와 V] displays an individual meaning whereas NP1 and NP2 as in [NP1와 NP2가 V] displays a collective meaning. In Chinese, the same effect comes from the placement of the adverb, not from the structural difference between the above two patterns.
Second, when Korean symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] is substituted by [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction, the [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction corresponds to two different Chinese constructions: one is the [NP1 V NP2] construction containing a transitive verb when the Korean verbs are ‘가깝다, 비슷하다, 어울리다’ and suchlike; two is the [NP1 和 NP2 V] symmetric construction when the Korean verbs are ‘모순되다, 대립하다, 반대되다’ and suchlike.
Lastly, when Korean symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] is substituted by a transitive construction [NP1가 NP2를 V], the transitive construction [NP1가 NP2를 V] also corresponds to a Chinese transitive construction [NP1 V NP2]. However, the Korean verbs appearing in [NP1가 NP2와 V] symmetric construction and [NP1가 NP2를 V] transitive construction share the same form, while Chinese verbs appearing in [NP1 和 NP2 V] symmetric construction and [NP1 V NP2] transitive construction do not absolutely share the same form such as ‘见面vs见’, ‘相遇vs邂逅/遇到’.

영어초록

In Korean, the symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] can be replaced by [NP1와 NP2가 V] construction, [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction or [NP1가 NP2를 V] construction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the corresponding symmetric construction relation between Korean and Chinese. For that, each pattern of the Korean symmetric construction was applied to that of Chinese and investigated how each set of corresponding construction should be interpreted. The findings are as follows: First, in Korean, the substitution of [NP1가 NP2와 V] by [NP1와 NP2가 V] altered the property of nouns: NP1 as in [NP1가 NP2와 V] displays an individual meaning whereas NP1 and NP2 as in [NP1와 NP2가 V] displays a collective meaning. In Chinese, the same effect comes from the placement of the adverb, not from the structural difference between the above two patterns.
Second, when Korean symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] is substituted by [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction, the [NP1가 NP2에 V] construction corresponds to two different Chinese constructions: one is the [NP1 V NP2] construction containing a transitive verb when the Korean verbs are ‘가깝다, 비슷하다, 어울리다’ and suchlike; two is the [NP1 和 NP2 V] symmetric construction when the Korean verbs are ‘모순되다, 대립하다, 반대되다’ and suchlike.
Lastly, when Korean symmetric construction [NP1가 NP2와 V] is substituted by a transitive construction [NP1가 NP2를 V], the transitive construction [NP1가 NP2를 V] also corresponds to a Chinese transitive construction [NP1 V NP2]. However, the Korean verbs appearing in [NP1가 NP2와 V] symmetric construction and [NP1가 NP2를 V] transitive construction share the same form, while Chinese verbs appearing in [NP1 和 NP2 V] symmetric construction and [NP1 V NP2] transitive construction do not absolutely share the same form such as ‘见面vs见’, ‘相遇vs邂逅/遇到’.

참고자료

· 없음