PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

안동김씨 김방경가문의 족보 간행과 변천 (The Publication of the Family Genealogy of Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan and Changes Thereto)

31 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.06.03 최종저작일 2013.12
31P 미리보기
안동김씨 김방경가문의 족보 간행과 변천
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국중세사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국중세사연구 / 37호 / 165 ~ 195페이지
    · 저자명 : 김난옥

    초록

    The oldest family genealogy of the Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan, the Gyeongjinbo was published in 1580(13th year of King Seonjo). Although Kim Ik was asked to write the first draft of the family genealogy in 1519, his subsequent involvement in political upheavals ensured that it was not completed during his lifetime. The first actual genealogy of the Andong Kim clan was published in 1580 by Kim Ik’s grandson.
    The Gyeongjinbo was based on the son’s family-oriented compilation system. Contrary to the Seonghwabo and Gajeongbo which included all the descendants regardless of whether they were those of the sons or daughters, the Gyeongjinbo recorded persons with the same surname in great details while only recording the descendants from daughters’ families in a haphazard manner. However, the children were recorded in the order of their births, with the emphasis being on the order of birth rather than whether they were male or female. Furthermore, the fact that there were very few instances in which adoption was pursued when there were no descendants shows that the succession of the family line through adoption was not yet emphasized.
    The Gimibo was published 159 years after the compilation of the Gyeongjinbo. Unlike the Gyeongjinbo, the Gimibo was prepared in a separate volume by family lineage due to the extension of the recorded descendants. The Gimibo included more personal information than the Gyeongjinbo. In addition, the Gimibo abided by the principle of separating people into those that belonged to the same and different clans by not inserting the surname of those who were from the same clan. The children were recorded based on the son-first daughter-later principle. Furthermore, legitimate and illegitimate children were clearly distinguished from one another, with entries showing whether a son was a legitimate or illegitimate child.
    The goals behind the publication of the Gyeongjinbo and Gimibo were respect for ancestors and the desire to continue the clan. While continuance of the family clan was not emphasized in the Gyeongjinbo, the separation of the family lineage and harmony between the relatives were emphasized in the Gimibo. The two genealogies exhibited similarities in terms of their differentiation of the family clan by limiting the recording scope of daughters’ descendants.
    In conclusion, the Gyeongjinbo was a family genealogy that reflected the son’s descendants and the son-oriented notion of kinship rather than a ‘genealogy of the descendants’ that included all descendants without separating them into sons’ and daughters’ descendants. The fact that the children were recorded in the order of births and that adoption was not implemented means that the work can be regarded as a family genealogy during the transition from ‘genealogy of the descendants’ to ‘genealogy of the family clan’. However, the compilation method of family genealogies based on the son’s descendants and son-oriented system had become entrenched by the time the Gimibo was compiled. The separation of illegitimate sons was also clearly implemented. The Gimibo was a typical paternal-line based ‘genealogy of the family clan’ that appeared in late Joseon.

    영어초록

    The oldest family genealogy of the Kim Bang-gyeong from the Andong Kim Clan, the Gyeongjinbo was published in 1580(13th year of King Seonjo). Although Kim Ik was asked to write the first draft of the family genealogy in 1519, his subsequent involvement in political upheavals ensured that it was not completed during his lifetime. The first actual genealogy of the Andong Kim clan was published in 1580 by Kim Ik’s grandson.
    The Gyeongjinbo was based on the son’s family-oriented compilation system. Contrary to the Seonghwabo and Gajeongbo which included all the descendants regardless of whether they were those of the sons or daughters, the Gyeongjinbo recorded persons with the same surname in great details while only recording the descendants from daughters’ families in a haphazard manner. However, the children were recorded in the order of their births, with the emphasis being on the order of birth rather than whether they were male or female. Furthermore, the fact that there were very few instances in which adoption was pursued when there were no descendants shows that the succession of the family line through adoption was not yet emphasized.
    The Gimibo was published 159 years after the compilation of the Gyeongjinbo. Unlike the Gyeongjinbo, the Gimibo was prepared in a separate volume by family lineage due to the extension of the recorded descendants. The Gimibo included more personal information than the Gyeongjinbo. In addition, the Gimibo abided by the principle of separating people into those that belonged to the same and different clans by not inserting the surname of those who were from the same clan. The children were recorded based on the son-first daughter-later principle. Furthermore, legitimate and illegitimate children were clearly distinguished from one another, with entries showing whether a son was a legitimate or illegitimate child.
    The goals behind the publication of the Gyeongjinbo and Gimibo were respect for ancestors and the desire to continue the clan. While continuance of the family clan was not emphasized in the Gyeongjinbo, the separation of the family lineage and harmony between the relatives were emphasized in the Gimibo. The two genealogies exhibited similarities in terms of their differentiation of the family clan by limiting the recording scope of daughters’ descendants.
    In conclusion, the Gyeongjinbo was a family genealogy that reflected the son’s descendants and the son-oriented notion of kinship rather than a ‘genealogy of the descendants’ that included all descendants without separating them into sons’ and daughters’ descendants. The fact that the children were recorded in the order of births and that adoption was not implemented means that the work can be regarded as a family genealogy during the transition from ‘genealogy of the descendants’ to ‘genealogy of the family clan’. However, the compilation method of family genealogies based on the son’s descendants and son-oriented system had become entrenched by the time the Gimibo was compiled. The separation of illegitimate sons was also clearly implemented. The Gimibo was a typical paternal-line based ‘genealogy of the family clan’ that appeared in late Joseon.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“한국중세사연구”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 08월 01일 금요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
10:54 오후