聱漢 孫起陽의 文學認識과 文學的 形象化 方式 (Ohan Son Ki-yang’s Literary Recognition and His Methods for Literary Formation)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국어문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 어문학 / 102호 / 253 ~ 286페이지
· 저자명 : 정우락

초록

The purpose of this study is to identify how war and daily life are embodied in his works according to Son Ki-yang(孫起陽)’s recognition of literature, and to consider the achievement and value of his works.
Son’s recognition of literature can be classified into theory of essence and theory of creation in literature, according to 『Bae-Min-Soe-lok(排悶瑣錄)』, his siwha(詩話). The fact he was interested in siwha indicates that he thought literature was not a mere taste. Son argued that the essence of literature lies in self-cultivation effectiveness. This may be because Son sufficiently recognized the literary theory of Confucianism. As for theory of creation in literature, Son particularly valued experience and self-realization, but he also spoke well of theory of modification, which indicates ‘being self’ of verses of the ancients and which he applied to his works specifically. This tendency can be verified by the fact that his poetry was cited of verses of Tu Fu(杜甫) and So Sik(蘇軾) and was superior in other aspects. Besides, that his works were full of zeitgeis with their pungent satires should be considered to be significant factor related to theory of contents in his works.
Son’s works were classified into two aspects: embodiment of war and embodiment of daily life. The former is shown as dreadfulness of war, refuge, specific experience of war, and post-war landscape. The description of war in his works may be achieved through mingling of his literary talent and recognition of reality. Meanwhile, the embodiment of daily life is shown as reading, studying, landscape sightseeing, and remembrance of ancient sages. He continued his reading and studying, describing his own interest in landscape in his works entirely. After the war, he displayed various activities and obatined favorble results for remembrance of ancient sages including Kim Jong-jik(金宗直) in order to promote studying.
The achievement and value of Son’s works are obtained from the peculiar situation of war and war-related shocks affecting daily life. The war stirred up Son’s life in whole, but he faithfully performed the basic life as a man of noble birth including reading and studying. In particular, the significant achievement and value of his works may lie in the facts: that he discovered the homogeneity between mountain sightseeing and literature as Lee Hwang(李滉) and Jung Gu(鄭逑) did, who served as his source of ethics; that he did not abandon hope for the future in the midst of the suffering in real life; that he showed the characteristics of literature in the areas of Nakdong River with acquiring Tu Fu(杜甫)’s poetry actively; that he realized a model of war literature by thorough embodiment of solitude; and that he captured human love revealed in crises and embodied it in his works.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to identify how war and daily life are embodied in his works according to Son Ki-yang(孫起陽)’s recognition of literature, and to consider the achievement and value of his works.
Son’s recognition of literature can be classified into theory of essence and theory of creation in literature, according to 『Bae-Min-Soe-lok(排悶瑣錄)』, his siwha(詩話). The fact he was interested in siwha indicates that he thought literature was not a mere taste. Son argued that the essence of literature lies in self-cultivation effectiveness. This may be because Son sufficiently recognized the literary theory of Confucianism. As for theory of creation in literature, Son particularly valued experience and self-realization, but he also spoke well of theory of modification, which indicates ‘being self’ of verses of the ancients and which he applied to his works specifically. This tendency can be verified by the fact that his poetry was cited of verses of Tu Fu(杜甫) and So Sik(蘇軾) and was superior in other aspects. Besides, that his works were full of zeitgeis with their pungent satires should be considered to be significant factor related to theory of contents in his works.
Son’s works were classified into two aspects: embodiment of war and embodiment of daily life. The former is shown as dreadfulness of war, refuge, specific experience of war, and post-war landscape. The description of war in his works may be achieved through mingling of his literary talent and recognition of reality. Meanwhile, the embodiment of daily life is shown as reading, studying, landscape sightseeing, and remembrance of ancient sages. He continued his reading and studying, describing his own interest in landscape in his works entirely. After the war, he displayed various activities and obatined favorble results for remembrance of ancient sages including Kim Jong-jik(金宗直) in order to promote studying.
The achievement and value of Son’s works are obtained from the peculiar situation of war and war-related shocks affecting daily life. The war stirred up Son’s life in whole, but he faithfully performed the basic life as a man of noble birth including reading and studying. In particular, the significant achievement and value of his works may lie in the facts: that he discovered the homogeneity between mountain sightseeing and literature as Lee Hwang(李滉) and Jung Gu(鄭逑) did, who served as his source of ethics; that he did not abandon hope for the future in the midst of the suffering in real life; that he showed the characteristics of literature in the areas of Nakdong River with acquiring Tu Fu(杜甫)’s poetry actively; that he realized a model of war literature by thorough embodiment of solitude; and that he captured human love revealed in crises and embodied it in his works.

참고자료

· 없음