• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

茶山에게서 易詞의 임의성과 易象의 근본성이 주는 철학적 의미 (The Voluntariness of the Statements(易詞) of the Book of Changes and the Essence of the Images(易象), and these Philosophical Significance in Tasan's Scholarship)

31 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.18 최종저작일 2008.03
31P 미리보기
茶山에게서 易詞의 임의성과 易象의 근본성이 주는 철학적 의미
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 연세대학교 국학연구원
    · 수록지 정보 : 동방학지 / 141호 / 405 ~ 435페이지
    · 저자명 : 황병기

    초록

    In the orthodox studies of Changes, the universe and a human being can be discussed by being melted in the huge and smooth unity dubbed the Way(Dao, 道) or the Principle(Li, 理). The universe and a human being could return to the integrative substance called Nonbeing(Wu, 無) in Wangbi's studies of Changes, on the other hand, could be included in the universal principle dubbed the Principle(理) in Zhuxi(朱熹)'s studies of Changes. However, in Tasan's studies of Changes, the Separation of Heaven and Human(天人分離) was made, in which the universe and a human being are divided under its top existence while the Lord of Heaven(Shangdi, 上帝) in the original confucianism is rehabilitated. Accordingly, the aspect of the Book of Changes(易), which has been regarded as being contained the overall truths in physica and humanities, cannot help being curtailed. In Tasan's composition, all the signs and symbols in humanities are not the field of nature but the field of a human being. As if nature and a human being compete under God, it is just that nature moves according to the principle of nature, and a human being lives according to the human ethics. As if a human being's invention is a human being's possession, even Zhouyi(the Book of Changes, 周易) is understood as a system of sign and symbol peculiar to a human being, which was discovered by mankind. Consequently, Zhouyi cannot help being perhaps imperfect and having boundary. It is why Tasan tried to read Zhouyi as cultural text in the restrictive space-time on later Yin Dynasty and earlier Zhou Dynasty(殷末周初). But his viewpoint toward Zhouyi doesn't indicate that he intended to speak ill of Zhouyi. That is because as if the Rituals of Zhou(周禮) was Tasan's ideal, the symbolic world in Zhouyi is reflecting nakedly the holy era that he deemed as ideal.
    All the contents related to the Ritual(Li, 禮), which appear in the Four Methods of Exposition on the Book of Changes(周易四箋), play an encyclopedic role for the object images in the hexagram and line statements(卦爻詞), and are tales(故事) necessary for explaining the background of the hexagram and line statements. Accordingly, the hexagram statements(卦詞) and the line statements(爻詞) in Zhouyi are not regarded both as the eternal truth that has diachronic characteristics(通時代性) and as the metaphysical truth that has the universal principle as Substance(體) and is consistent integratively in the order of humanity(人文秩序) as its Function(用).
    Grasping Zhouyi as the cultural phenomenon in the restricted space-time is a really great challenge against the orthodox learning. In addition, the attempt that excludes both the principle of nature and the metaphysical principle of combination of humanities and tries to look at only from the humane viewpoint seems to be insecure.
    What he devoted himself to delving for the studies of Confucian Classics(經學) was an attempt to rehabilitate a science for humans that the studies of Confucian Classics(經學) has. He made his effort to revive the moral spirit in the so-called primitive Confucianism.

    영어초록

    In the orthodox studies of Changes, the universe and a human being can be discussed by being melted in the huge and smooth unity dubbed the Way(Dao, 道) or the Principle(Li, 理). The universe and a human being could return to the integrative substance called Nonbeing(Wu, 無) in Wangbi's studies of Changes, on the other hand, could be included in the universal principle dubbed the Principle(理) in Zhuxi(朱熹)'s studies of Changes. However, in Tasan's studies of Changes, the Separation of Heaven and Human(天人分離) was made, in which the universe and a human being are divided under its top existence while the Lord of Heaven(Shangdi, 上帝) in the original confucianism is rehabilitated. Accordingly, the aspect of the Book of Changes(易), which has been regarded as being contained the overall truths in physica and humanities, cannot help being curtailed. In Tasan's composition, all the signs and symbols in humanities are not the field of nature but the field of a human being. As if nature and a human being compete under God, it is just that nature moves according to the principle of nature, and a human being lives according to the human ethics. As if a human being's invention is a human being's possession, even Zhouyi(the Book of Changes, 周易) is understood as a system of sign and symbol peculiar to a human being, which was discovered by mankind. Consequently, Zhouyi cannot help being perhaps imperfect and having boundary. It is why Tasan tried to read Zhouyi as cultural text in the restrictive space-time on later Yin Dynasty and earlier Zhou Dynasty(殷末周初). But his viewpoint toward Zhouyi doesn't indicate that he intended to speak ill of Zhouyi. That is because as if the Rituals of Zhou(周禮) was Tasan's ideal, the symbolic world in Zhouyi is reflecting nakedly the holy era that he deemed as ideal.
    All the contents related to the Ritual(Li, 禮), which appear in the Four Methods of Exposition on the Book of Changes(周易四箋), play an encyclopedic role for the object images in the hexagram and line statements(卦爻詞), and are tales(故事) necessary for explaining the background of the hexagram and line statements. Accordingly, the hexagram statements(卦詞) and the line statements(爻詞) in Zhouyi are not regarded both as the eternal truth that has diachronic characteristics(通時代性) and as the metaphysical truth that has the universal principle as Substance(體) and is consistent integratively in the order of humanity(人文秩序) as its Function(用).
    Grasping Zhouyi as the cultural phenomenon in the restricted space-time is a really great challenge against the orthodox learning. In addition, the attempt that excludes both the principle of nature and the metaphysical principle of combination of humanities and tries to look at only from the humane viewpoint seems to be insecure.
    What he devoted himself to delving for the studies of Confucian Classics(經學) was an attempt to rehabilitate a science for humans that the studies of Confucian Classics(經學) has. He made his effort to revive the moral spirit in the so-called primitive Confucianism.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“동방학지”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 프레시홍 - 추석
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 24일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
12:10 오후