죠직 다시 쓰기—아나 레티셔 바볼드의「빨래하는 날」 (Rewriting Georgic: Anna Letitia Barbauld’s “Washing-Day”)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국영어영문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 영어영문학 / 56권 / 5호 / 947 ~ 971페이지
· 저자명 : 신경숙

초록

Anna Letitia Barbauld’s poem “Washing-Day” (1797) has sparked a variety of feminist critical endeavors over the past two decades. While many feminist literary critics try to salvage the poem as a successful tongue-in-cheek riposte directed at the male dominant literary world, more rigorous Marxist feminists accuse Barbauld of being limited by her own middle-class woman’s view on women’s domestic labor. Legitimate as they may be, these readings fail to elucidate Barbauld's place in a larger literary and intellectual discourse during the eighteenth century. In this paper I read “Washing-Day” as a woman’s georgic, a genre or mode concerned with agricultural labor, the public value of which was highly recognized in eighteenth-century England. Alluding to canonical texts by writers like Shakespeare, Milton, and Pope, Barbauld’s “loaded lines” in mock-heroic form create a space in which the women’s domestic labor of washing interrupts men’s daily routines and disrupts their poetic assumptions. While she makes women’s work visible, Barbauld also addresses its quintessential nature. Women’s work is affective labor; women have to labor physically and mentally to produce the desired domestic comfort.
By allowing the image of the soap “bubble” to echo with many “bubbles” in other writers’ texts, from the soap bubbles the narrator used to play with as a child to the hot-air balloon “bubble” of the Montgolfier brothers,Barbauld pleasantly equates work and day-dreaming, men’s toil and child’s play, and finally public, scientific, and recognized labor and private,domestic, and imaginative activities.

영어초록

Anna Letitia Barbauld’s poem “Washing-Day” (1797) has sparked a variety of feminist critical endeavors over the past two decades. While many feminist literary critics try to salvage the poem as a successful tongue-in-cheek riposte directed at the male dominant literary world, more rigorous Marxist feminists accuse Barbauld of being limited by her own middle-class woman’s view on women’s domestic labor. Legitimate as they may be, these readings fail to elucidate Barbauld's place in a larger literary and intellectual discourse during the eighteenth century. In this paper I read “Washing-Day” as a woman’s georgic, a genre or mode concerned with agricultural labor, the public value of which was highly recognized in eighteenth-century England. Alluding to canonical texts by writers like Shakespeare, Milton, and Pope, Barbauld’s “loaded lines” in mock-heroic form create a space in which the women’s domestic labor of washing interrupts men’s daily routines and disrupts their poetic assumptions. While she makes women’s work visible, Barbauld also addresses its quintessential nature. Women’s work is affective labor; women have to labor physically and mentally to produce the desired domestic comfort.
By allowing the image of the soap “bubble” to echo with many “bubbles” in other writers’ texts, from the soap bubbles the narrator used to play with as a child to the hot-air balloon “bubble” of the Montgolfier brothers,Barbauld pleasantly equates work and day-dreaming, men’s toil and child’s play, and finally public, scientific, and recognized labor and private,domestic, and imaginative activities.

참고자료

· 없음