과학 전시물의 조도 적정성 평가 지표에 관한 연구- 국립중앙과학관 자연사관 전시물을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Evaluation Factors for Illuminance Appropriateness of Science Exhibits - Focus on Natural History Exhibits of National Science Museum in Korea -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국문화공간건축학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 / 80호 / 31 ~ 42페이지
· 저자명 : 도재국, 김석형, 최규삼

초록

The lighting of the exhibition hall in a museum or science museum plays an auxiliary role in showing the purpose and characteristics of the exhibition and is a factor that strengthens the concentration and emotion of the exhibits. In order to evaluate the appropriateness of lighting and illumination for exhibits, 77 factors were selected and surveyed by 67 employees of the National Science Museums and 3 exhibition companies. 19 factors were selected by statistical analysis. Selected factors of average scores were more than 8, and the p-value of those were 0.05 or less compared to 40% of total factors. 15 science museum exhibits were evaluated by 19 factors and statistically analyzed. 10 factors were significantly different between more than every 3 exhibits in both the upper(average scores : more than 7) and lower(average scores : lower than 5) evaluation results. The 10 selected factors were investigated as efficient and essential factors for the evaluation of the lighting of the exhibits and the illumination of the exhibits. The 10 factors are 1) the distance between the lighting fixtures and the exhibits, 2) the installation location of the lighting fixtures, 3) the illuminance of each exhibit, 4) the uniformity of illuminance, 5) differential illuminance (internal illuminance of the exhibit > illuminance on the panel > external illuminance of the exhibit), 6) light focus on the exhibits, 7) lighting display effect, 8) readability, 9) visibility, and 10) ease of repair. As the results of evaluating 15 individual exhibits with 10 and 19 factors, the excellent exhibits for illuminance appropriateness were 1) endemic plants of Korean Peninsula, 2) grypania, the first eukaryote, 3) bacteria kingdom, etc., 4) mesozoic fish fossils of Korean Peninsula, 5) leading fossils, 6) Ediacara fossil fauna, and 7) moon rock, rock from the moon(only in 10 factors evaluation) and were significantly different from 1) defensive features of herbivorous dinosaurs, 2) weapons of carnivorous, and 3) Cenozoic mammals in Korean Peninsula within 95% confidence. The evaluation results of these three exhibits were significantly lower in more than 10 factors of 19 factors and 9 factors of 10 selected factors. Evaluation factors of illumination can be used for the design and production stage, but they did not give a specific answer on the appropriate illuminance for the exhibition in different conditions. Therefore, in the next study, we plan to prepare and present a standard for an appropriate illuminance for the surrounding lighting environment.

영어초록

The lighting of the exhibition hall in a museum or science museum plays an auxiliary role in showing the purpose and characteristics of the exhibition and is a factor that strengthens the concentration and emotion of the exhibits. In order to evaluate the appropriateness of lighting and illumination for exhibits, 77 factors were selected and surveyed by 67 employees of the National Science Museums and 3 exhibition companies. 19 factors were selected by statistical analysis. Selected factors of average scores were more than 8, and the p-value of those were 0.05 or less compared to 40% of total factors. 15 science museum exhibits were evaluated by 19 factors and statistically analyzed. 10 factors were significantly different between more than every 3 exhibits in both the upper(average scores : more than 7) and lower(average scores : lower than 5) evaluation results. The 10 selected factors were investigated as efficient and essential factors for the evaluation of the lighting of the exhibits and the illumination of the exhibits. The 10 factors are 1) the distance between the lighting fixtures and the exhibits, 2) the installation location of the lighting fixtures, 3) the illuminance of each exhibit, 4) the uniformity of illuminance, 5) differential illuminance (internal illuminance of the exhibit > illuminance on the panel > external illuminance of the exhibit), 6) light focus on the exhibits, 7) lighting display effect, 8) readability, 9) visibility, and 10) ease of repair. As the results of evaluating 15 individual exhibits with 10 and 19 factors, the excellent exhibits for illuminance appropriateness were 1) endemic plants of Korean Peninsula, 2) grypania, the first eukaryote, 3) bacteria kingdom, etc., 4) mesozoic fish fossils of Korean Peninsula, 5) leading fossils, 6) Ediacara fossil fauna, and 7) moon rock, rock from the moon(only in 10 factors evaluation) and were significantly different from 1) defensive features of herbivorous dinosaurs, 2) weapons of carnivorous, and 3) Cenozoic mammals in Korean Peninsula within 95% confidence. The evaluation results of these three exhibits were significantly lower in more than 10 factors of 19 factors and 9 factors of 10 selected factors. Evaluation factors of illumination can be used for the design and production stage, but they did not give a specific answer on the appropriate illuminance for the exhibition in different conditions. Therefore, in the next study, we plan to prepare and present a standard for an appropriate illuminance for the surrounding lighting environment.

참고자료

· 없음