치면세마 실습실 방문자의 구취에 대한 주관적 자각정도와 관심 (Perceived oral malodor and need for dental care among visitors receiving dental prophylaxis)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국치위생학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국치위생학회지 / 11권 / 6호 / 843 ~ 852페이지
· 저자명 : 정미경, 장계원, 강용주

초록

Objectives : The aims of the study were to examine perceived oral malodor and self-reported need for oral and dental care among patients receiving oral prophylaxis services and provide guidelines for developing educational programs(toothbrushing method and tongue cleaning) for oral hygiene and oral malodor prevention.
Methods : The survey was administered to a sample of 462 receiving voluntary oral prophylaxis service in a dental laboratory at the J School of Public Health in Korea. The subjects were asked a range of questions related to the degrees of perceived oral malodor and concern for oral health status, as well as their demographic information and need for oral and dental treatment. Univariate analyses using Chi-square and T-test with a P-value of .05 were performed using SPSS Version 12.0 for Windows.
Results : 1. Male participants reported “moderately concerned for bad breath and smell”and “I don’t care bad breath and smell”39.1% and 26.2% respectively, while more female participants were concerned for oral malodor.
“moderately concerned for malodor”and“ highly concerned for malodor”41.1% and 28.5%(p<.05). a significant difference among age groups was found. 19% of young adults (less than or equal to 29 years of age) reported“ highly concerned for bad breath and smell”while 36.4% of older adults (greater than or equal to 50 years of age) reported “highly concerned for bad breath and smell ”(p<.05). 2. 12 non-smoking participants (3.7%) and 15 smoking participants (10.8%) reported that they have perceived bad breadth and smell (p<.05). 3. Smoking participants reported a higher degree of need for oral malodor treatment than that of non-smoking participants 88.5% and 82% respectively(p<.05). 4. The participants who did regular toothbrushing more than 3 times a day reported“ no malodor”, 77 % as compared to 66.7% of the participants who did regular toothbrushing 2 times a day. Toothbrushing 2 times a day reported either “moderate malodor “or “sever malodor”(p<.01). Participants with more frequent toothbrushing reported less oral and breath odor as compared participants with less frequent toothbrushing.
Conclusions : The study suggested that there is a need to oral prophylaxis for prevention and toothbrushing and tongue cleaning method oral malodor care and oral health status.

영어초록

Objectives : The aims of the study were to examine perceived oral malodor and self-reported need for oral and dental care among patients receiving oral prophylaxis services and provide guidelines for developing educational programs(toothbrushing method and tongue cleaning) for oral hygiene and oral malodor prevention.
Methods : The survey was administered to a sample of 462 receiving voluntary oral prophylaxis service in a dental laboratory at the J School of Public Health in Korea. The subjects were asked a range of questions related to the degrees of perceived oral malodor and concern for oral health status, as well as their demographic information and need for oral and dental treatment. Univariate analyses using Chi-square and T-test with a P-value of .05 were performed using SPSS Version 12.0 for Windows.
Results : 1. Male participants reported “moderately concerned for bad breath and smell”and “I don’t care bad breath and smell”39.1% and 26.2% respectively, while more female participants were concerned for oral malodor.
“moderately concerned for malodor”and“ highly concerned for malodor”41.1% and 28.5%(p<.05). a significant difference among age groups was found. 19% of young adults (less than or equal to 29 years of age) reported“ highly concerned for bad breath and smell”while 36.4% of older adults (greater than or equal to 50 years of age) reported “highly concerned for bad breath and smell ”(p<.05). 2. 12 non-smoking participants (3.7%) and 15 smoking participants (10.8%) reported that they have perceived bad breadth and smell (p<.05). 3. Smoking participants reported a higher degree of need for oral malodor treatment than that of non-smoking participants 88.5% and 82% respectively(p<.05). 4. The participants who did regular toothbrushing more than 3 times a day reported“ no malodor”, 77 % as compared to 66.7% of the participants who did regular toothbrushing 2 times a day. Toothbrushing 2 times a day reported either “moderate malodor “or “sever malodor”(p<.01). Participants with more frequent toothbrushing reported less oral and breath odor as compared participants with less frequent toothbrushing.
Conclusions : The study suggested that there is a need to oral prophylaxis for prevention and toothbrushing and tongue cleaning method oral malodor care and oral health status.

참고자료

· 없음