19세기 말 20세기 초 일본어 형식명사 ‘こと, の’에 대응 하는 한국어의 양상과 변천 (A diachronic study of Korean corresponding to Japanese formal noun '-koto', amd '-no' from the late 19th century to the early 20th century)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국일본어학회
· 수록지 정보 : 일본어학연구 / 68호 / 141 ~ 157페이지
· 저자명 : 유수연

초록

This study examines the diachronic aspect of the Japanese formal nouns 'koto' and 'no' and their corresponding expressions in Korean. The data analyzed in this study are Japanese and Korean text books from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century.
Results are as follows.
Firstly, reparding the distribution of semantic characteristics, 'koto' was used as a real noun, ‘to-iu-kotoha’ patterns and modality usages. In particular, the formal noun use represents frequency of 72%. In particular, 'no' shows, 37.2% of use as a formal noun, 31% as a substitute for a real noun, and 24.6% for a modality usage. This shows that ‘no’ was used evenly in a variety of usages. Next, in terms of corresponding expressiions in Korean, Japanese 'koto' corresponds to 'il',‘ki','um' noun clause,’ and ‘kes'. Firstly, ‘il’ shows frequency of 38% and is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Secondly, the ‘ki, um’ noun clause shows frequency of 19.3%, mostly in nominal sentences. Thirdly, ‘kes’ is used when it is interchangeable with the ‘ki, um' noun clause or ‘il’. On the other hand, Japanese 'no' mostly corresponds to the Korean ‘kes’. It's frequency is 60%. This means that the meaning of the Korean 'kes' is more diverse than that of the Japanese 'no'. In addition, in 21.3% of cases, verbs have been frequently used as corresponding words to 'no'modality usages and ‘to-iu-noha’ patterns since the 1910s. The ‘ki, um’noun clause rarely appears with frequency of 6%.

영어초록

This study examines the diachronic aspect of the Japanese formal nouns 'koto' and 'no' and their corresponding expressions in Korean. The data analyzed in this study are Japanese and Korean text books from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century.
Results are as follows.
Firstly, reparding the distribution of semantic characteristics, 'koto' was used as a real noun, ‘to-iu-kotoha’ patterns and modality usages. In particular, the formal noun use represents frequency of 72%. In particular, 'no' shows, 37.2% of use as a formal noun, 31% as a substitute for a real noun, and 24.6% for a modality usage. This shows that ‘no’ was used evenly in a variety of usages. Next, in terms of corresponding expressiions in Korean, Japanese 'koto' corresponds to 'il',‘ki','um' noun clause,’ and ‘kes'. Firstly, ‘il’ shows frequency of 38% and is used as a corresponding word in almost all usages. Secondly, the ‘ki, um’ noun clause shows frequency of 19.3%, mostly in nominal sentences. Thirdly, ‘kes’ is used when it is interchangeable with the ‘ki, um' noun clause or ‘il’. On the other hand, Japanese 'no' mostly corresponds to the Korean ‘kes’. It's frequency is 60%. This means that the meaning of the Korean 'kes' is more diverse than that of the Japanese 'no'. In addition, in 21.3% of cases, verbs have been frequently used as corresponding words to 'no'modality usages and ‘to-iu-noha’ patterns since the 1910s. The ‘ki, um’noun clause rarely appears with frequency of 6%.

참고자료

· 없음