J. 보드리야르의 시뮬라크르, 시뮬라시옹 개념에 대한 일 반역(反譯) (The argumentation against Baudrillard’s Simularcrum and Simulation)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국해석학회
· 수록지 정보 : 해석학연구 / 21호 / 139 ~ 179페이지
· 저자명 : 박치완

초록

Many of European philosophers cited or remembered by people have created their own's philosophical concept without exception. Even though we set boundary of comtemporary French-philosophy, it is proved by Bergson's Durée, Merleau-Ponty's Chair, Derrida's Différance, Deleuze's Différence, Foucault's Épistémè, Levinas's Autre, Wunenburger's Dualitude, Lefèbvre's Quotidienté, Bourdieu's Habitus and so on. Baudrillard's Simulacrum (or Simulation) that we are going to focus on this study is the same.
However, we should carefully consider a fact that all new philosophical concepts do not always present the open-world to us. In other words, sometimes they do not fundamentally serve the Real as a medium of philosophy. They are not based on the soundness for the thought and even for the world. The French expression, “le Tout contre tous”(a match for a hundred) is an example of the extreme way, which means that someone uses only one concept for explaining all phenomenon. And Baudrillard's Simulacrum exposes this way. He denies whole existing things for constructing the structure of thought that he dreaming by using one concept that is called Simulacrum. However his attempt is not possible to realize in the real world, and it is an attractive work just in fiction, but not in the theory. For there is an essential difference between fiction and theory.
On this study, we will critically or reflectively access Baudrillard's fiction by remembering Bacon's aphorism, "if an untruth in truth has once spreaded, it never calms down". And we will consider what his firm belief about the technology, the electronic system and the information that he missing. And then finally we will emphasize that his analysis-model for the future american consumer society is not possible to be a model for sound society by any means.
Nowadays, the image is becoming vulgar. All things are changed to consumption goods in the consumer society and human beings are also included in this society. In short, image and simularcrum do not have any spirituality and holiness. There is the reason why we have to free ourselves from the digital field. If we do not make any effort to out of the hole, then we will stay forever as a slave in an artificial cave that is called Baudrillard's simulation. We can not do anything for the people who do not realize it and just enjoy personally as homo digipiens and homo connectus. However, that is why we look straight the real world, and refuse the world of Baudrillard's simulation that work by the simulacrum.

영어초록

Many of European philosophers cited or remembered by people have created their own's philosophical concept without exception. Even though we set boundary of comtemporary French-philosophy, it is proved by Bergson's Durée, Merleau-Ponty's Chair, Derrida's Différance, Deleuze's Différence, Foucault's Épistémè, Levinas's Autre, Wunenburger's Dualitude, Lefèbvre's Quotidienté, Bourdieu's Habitus and so on. Baudrillard's Simulacrum (or Simulation) that we are going to focus on this study is the same.
However, we should carefully consider a fact that all new philosophical concepts do not always present the open-world to us. In other words, sometimes they do not fundamentally serve the Real as a medium of philosophy. They are not based on the soundness for the thought and even for the world. The French expression, “le Tout contre tous”(a match for a hundred) is an example of the extreme way, which means that someone uses only one concept for explaining all phenomenon. And Baudrillard's Simulacrum exposes this way. He denies whole existing things for constructing the structure of thought that he dreaming by using one concept that is called Simulacrum. However his attempt is not possible to realize in the real world, and it is an attractive work just in fiction, but not in the theory. For there is an essential difference between fiction and theory.
On this study, we will critically or reflectively access Baudrillard's fiction by remembering Bacon's aphorism, "if an untruth in truth has once spreaded, it never calms down". And we will consider what his firm belief about the technology, the electronic system and the information that he missing. And then finally we will emphasize that his analysis-model for the future american consumer society is not possible to be a model for sound society by any means.
Nowadays, the image is becoming vulgar. All things are changed to consumption goods in the consumer society and human beings are also included in this society. In short, image and simularcrum do not have any spirituality and holiness. There is the reason why we have to free ourselves from the digital field. If we do not make any effort to out of the hole, then we will stay forever as a slave in an artificial cave that is called Baudrillard's simulation. We can not do anything for the people who do not realize it and just enjoy personally as homo digipiens and homo connectus. However, that is why we look straight the real world, and refuse the world of Baudrillard's simulation that work by the simulacrum.

참고자료

· 없음