고전적 유신론과 만유재신론 (Classical Theism and Panentheism)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국조직신학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국조직신학논총 / 25호 / 101 ~ 132페이지
· 저자명 : 윤철호

초록

The aim of this article is to grope for the prospect of the desirable
panentheistic vision by comparing the main points of panentheism
with those of classical theism.
Classical theism is the mainstream doctrine of God in the Christian
tradition. It was formed in the ancient Hellenistic influenced by the
ideas of Greek philosophers such as Plato, Plotinus and Aristotle, and
has been worked out and carried on in the western theological
tradition. Classical Theism asserts that God is transcendent, selfsufficient,
eternal, and immutable. It also emphasizes the apathy and
the impassivity of God. In the dualistic point of view, classical theism
separates God, the Creator, and the world created.
Panentheism, the term devised by Karl C, F. Krause, says that God
is present in “All” while being transcendent at the same time.
Panentheism emphasizes the intimate relationship between God and
the world. God gives human beings the freedom to choose among the
possibilities, which is the prerequisite of responsibilities. The power
of God is neither one-sided nor compulsory but persuasive and
patient. It is the power of love, which is nothing other than God. This
view can be maintained on the basis of biblical proofs, too. One of the
useful analogies which well explains the panentheistic relationship
between God and the world is the mind/body model. It’s an alternative
model to overcome the dualistic world-view of classical theism and to
contribute to understanding the organic relationship of God and the
world, though this analogia has a weak point to maintain the transcendence
of God as creator. So the hermeneutic task is required.
Classical theism in the traditional form has many differences from
panentheism, yet the actively revised classical theism, which admits
the participation of God into time and world, and recognizes the
mutual relationship between them can be a good theological
companion and dialogical partner with panentheism.

영어초록

The aim of this article is to grope for the prospect of the desirable
panentheistic vision by comparing the main points of panentheism
with those of classical theism.
Classical theism is the mainstream doctrine of God in the Christian
tradition. It was formed in the ancient Hellenistic influenced by the
ideas of Greek philosophers such as Plato, Plotinus and Aristotle, and
has been worked out and carried on in the western theological
tradition. Classical Theism asserts that God is transcendent, selfsufficient,
eternal, and immutable. It also emphasizes the apathy and
the impassivity of God. In the dualistic point of view, classical theism
separates God, the Creator, and the world created.
Panentheism, the term devised by Karl C, F. Krause, says that God
is present in “All” while being transcendent at the same time.
Panentheism emphasizes the intimate relationship between God and
the world. God gives human beings the freedom to choose among the
possibilities, which is the prerequisite of responsibilities. The power
of God is neither one-sided nor compulsory but persuasive and
patient. It is the power of love, which is nothing other than God. This
view can be maintained on the basis of biblical proofs, too. One of the
useful analogies which well explains the panentheistic relationship
between God and the world is the mind/body model. It’s an alternative
model to overcome the dualistic world-view of classical theism and to
contribute to understanding the organic relationship of God and the
world, though this analogia has a weak point to maintain the transcendence
of God as creator. So the hermeneutic task is required.
Classical theism in the traditional form has many differences from
panentheism, yet the actively revised classical theism, which admits
the participation of God into time and world, and recognizes the
mutual relationship between them can be a good theological
companion and dialogical partner with panentheism.

참고자료

· 없음