한국어 고급학습자들의 한국어 주어 인식 연구 (A study on the perception of Korean subjects of advanced Korean learners)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한말연구학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한말연구 / 65권 / 33호 / 1 ~ 20페이지
· 저자명 : 박은정

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine how advanced learners perceive the subject of Korean sentences and whether they properly grasp the corresponding relationship of magic in order to educate Korean learners to recognize the correct subject.
Texts in Korean were distributed to advanced Korean learners, and in sentences that were judged to have a subject, the subject was found and underlined, and in sentences that were judged to have been omitted, the subject was restored and inserted.
It can be seen that advanced learners are high-level learners of topic level 6 or higher, but they do not accurately recognize subjects omitted from Korean sentences through data analysis that identified subjects. First of all, it should be recognized that the subject of Korean sentences is sometimes omitted or not omitted.
The cases in which the subject is omitted from the sentence are as follows. "If the subject of the preceding sentence is repeatedly used as the subject of the next sentence, if the object of the preceding sentence is used as the subject in the next sentence, that is, if the subject is an unspecified number, that is, if it is a formal subject, then the author (writer) that can be used as a first person pronoun," and "indicative pronoun used as an indication of the previous sentence." This is because the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause are omitted despite the difference between the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause, especially the case where the subject of the preceding clause is omitted despite the difference between the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause. When the subject is omitted, an indication expression is given, but when the subject is omitted, it is considered that it is a type that is difficult for advanced learners. This is because the focus is not on the fact that the subject omitted from the sentence should be restored to compose the sentence, but it is necessary to understand what the omitted component is, so that it can be translated into an accurate sentence in consideration of the subject corresponding to the predicate when translating.
In addition, it should be possible to accurately recognize the subject even in sentences in which the subjective survey 'in' is combined with a noun that expresses a group among the subjects that are not omitted, and in addition, in sentences expressed by changing the survey that combines with the original sentence component to another survey for emphasis function. Although not a large number of learners, there are cases in which they are not recognized as subjects, suggesting that advanced learners should be given education. Finding the omitted subject, the omitted subject, especially in the compound sentence, will not be easy for foreign learners. However, it is necessary to find a way to find the subject of the entire sentence and the subject of the inner sentence or the connection statement. One way to present is to find the predicate in the sentence first and find the corresponding subject.
The academic significance of this study can be found in that it is the first study on how high-level Korean learners perceive Korean subjects and emphasizes the need for subject education in Korean sentences for high-level learners, although this study has limitations in that it did not deal with various texts and did not target more learners.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to examine how advanced learners perceive the subject of Korean sentences and whether they properly grasp the corresponding relationship of magic in order to educate Korean learners to recognize the correct subject.
Texts in Korean were distributed to advanced Korean learners, and in sentences that were judged to have a subject, the subject was found and underlined, and in sentences that were judged to have been omitted, the subject was restored and inserted.
It can be seen that advanced learners are high-level learners of topic level 6 or higher, but they do not accurately recognize subjects omitted from Korean sentences through data analysis that identified subjects. First of all, it should be recognized that the subject of Korean sentences is sometimes omitted or not omitted.
The cases in which the subject is omitted from the sentence are as follows. "If the subject of the preceding sentence is repeatedly used as the subject of the next sentence, if the object of the preceding sentence is used as the subject in the next sentence, that is, if the subject is an unspecified number, that is, if it is a formal subject, then the author (writer) that can be used as a first person pronoun," and "indicative pronoun used as an indication of the previous sentence." This is because the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause are omitted despite the difference between the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause, especially the case where the subject of the preceding clause is omitted despite the difference between the subject of the preceding clause and the subject of the following clause. When the subject is omitted, an indication expression is given, but when the subject is omitted, it is considered that it is a type that is difficult for advanced learners. This is because the focus is not on the fact that the subject omitted from the sentence should be restored to compose the sentence, but it is necessary to understand what the omitted component is, so that it can be translated into an accurate sentence in consideration of the subject corresponding to the predicate when translating.
In addition, it should be possible to accurately recognize the subject even in sentences in which the subjective survey 'in' is combined with a noun that expresses a group among the subjects that are not omitted, and in addition, in sentences expressed by changing the survey that combines with the original sentence component to another survey for emphasis function. Although not a large number of learners, there are cases in which they are not recognized as subjects, suggesting that advanced learners should be given education. Finding the omitted subject, the omitted subject, especially in the compound sentence, will not be easy for foreign learners. However, it is necessary to find a way to find the subject of the entire sentence and the subject of the inner sentence or the connection statement. One way to present is to find the predicate in the sentence first and find the corresponding subject.
The academic significance of this study can be found in that it is the first study on how high-level Korean learners perceive Korean subjects and emphasizes the need for subject education in Korean sentences for high-level learners, although this study has limitations in that it did not deal with various texts and did not target more learners.

참고자료

· 없음