테니스 동호인 복식경기의 선수위치에 따른 득·실점 분석 (Analysis on the Point of Winning and Losing Teams in accordancewith Players’ Positions in Club Members’ Tennis Doubles)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국사회체육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국사회체육학회지 / 57호 / 477 ~ 486페이지
· 저자명 : 황영성, 유현조, 박재성

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the game contents releadt to winning/losing points of winning andlosing teams in accordance with players’ positions in club members’ tennis doubles. The subjects of this studywere 36 tennis double games of the national tennis club held inS city, G do. For the data analysis, we co-nducted cross-tabulation analysis and chi-square test, and the ersults are like following. First, the scores of th ewinning team were the highest in AreaⒶ (35.2%), while the lowest in AreaⒺ (3.9%). The proportion of scoresin AreaⒷ, AreaⒸ, and AreaⒹ were 34.1%, 8.1% and 18.7%, respecvtei ly. These differences were statisticallysignificant (p<.001). Second, the loss of scores in the winning team was the highest in AreaⒷ (33.8%) and thelowest in AreaⒶ (3.3%). The rest areas are in the order of AreaⒹ (28.1%), AreaⒺ (18.9%), and AreaⒸ (15.9%).
These differences were also statistically significant (p<.001). Third, the scores of the losing team were in AreaⒶ (32.3%), AreaⒷ (37.9%), AreaⒸ (7.2%), AreaⒹ (15.7%) and AreaⒺ (6.9%), which was significantly different(p<.001). This result indicates that the loser would gain scores most often in AreaⒷ but hardly in AreaⒺ .
Fourth, the loss of scores in the losing team were in AreaⒶ (03%. ), AreaⒷ (34.2%), AreaⒸ (13.7%), AreaⒹ(24.4%) and AreaⒺ (24.7%), which was also significantly different (p<.001), showing that the loser would losescores mostly in AreaⒷ but hardly in AreaⒶ. These results suggests that the amateur such as sports club tennisplayers should try to play in AreaⒶ to get more scores and lose less scores for their victory in double matches.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the game contents releadt to winning/losing points of winning andlosing teams in accordance with players’ positions in club members’ tennis doubles. The subjects of this studywere 36 tennis double games of the national tennis club held inS city, G do. For the data analysis, we co-nducted cross-tabulation analysis and chi-square test, and the ersults are like following. First, the scores of th ewinning team were the highest in AreaⒶ (35.2%), while the lowest in AreaⒺ (3.9%). The proportion of scoresin AreaⒷ, AreaⒸ, and AreaⒹ were 34.1%, 8.1% and 18.7%, respecvtei ly. These differences were statisticallysignificant (p<.001). Second, the loss of scores in the winning team was the highest in AreaⒷ (33.8%) and thelowest in AreaⒶ (3.3%). The rest areas are in the order of AreaⒹ (28.1%), AreaⒺ (18.9%), and AreaⒸ (15.9%).
These differences were also statistically significant (p<.001). Third, the scores of the losing team were in AreaⒶ (32.3%), AreaⒷ (37.9%), AreaⒸ (7.2%), AreaⒹ (15.7%) and AreaⒺ (6.9%), which was significantly different(p<.001). This result indicates that the loser would gain scores most often in AreaⒷ but hardly in AreaⒺ .
Fourth, the loss of scores in the losing team were in AreaⒶ (03%. ), AreaⒷ (34.2%), AreaⒸ (13.7%), AreaⒹ(24.4%) and AreaⒺ (24.7%), which was also significantly different (p<.001), showing that the loser would losescores mostly in AreaⒷ but hardly in AreaⒶ. These results suggests that the amateur such as sports club tennisplayers should try to play in AreaⒶ to get more scores and lose less scores for their victory in double matches.

참고자료

· 없음