현장실습과 온라인실습 유형별 간호 대학생의 실습 만족도 및 학업성취도 비교 (Comparison of Satisfaction and Academic Achievement between Field and Online Practice of Nursing Students)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 경북대학교 간호혁신연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 간호와 혁신 / 25권 / 2호 / 31 ~ 40페이지
· 저자명 : 전은영, 김소현, 김민중, 김서현, 김성주, 김소영, 김소현, 김아영, 김예빈, 김정은, 김주현, 김지수

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the level of satisfaction and academic achievement of nursing students' clinical practice achievement between field and online practice. Methods: In this descriptive research, we recruited junior and senior nursing students who experienced both field and online practice from nursing college in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, Korea. Data were collected using the online survey and analyzed via a t-test, ANOVA, and paired t-test using SPSS V 25.0. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the satisfaction of practice between field and online practice types. However, academic achievement was higher in the field group than in the online group. Out of five points, the scores of field practice and online practice were 3.66 points and 3.39 points, respectively, which indicated that academic performance was higher in field practice than online practice (t=6.21, p<.001). Conclusion: Field practice has been shown to achieve higher academic performance than online practice. Hence, research is needed in order to develop suitable field practice models for the New Normal era in preparation for situations that practice is limited, such as COVID-19 and future outbreaks.

영어초록

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the level of satisfaction and academic achievement of nursing students' clinical practice achievement between field and online practice. Methods: In this descriptive research, we recruited junior and senior nursing students who experienced both field and online practice from nursing college in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, Korea. Data were collected using the online survey and analyzed via a t-test, ANOVA, and paired t-test using SPSS V 25.0. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the satisfaction of practice between field and online practice types. However, academic achievement was higher in the field group than in the online group. Out of five points, the scores of field practice and online practice were 3.66 points and 3.39 points, respectively, which indicated that academic performance was higher in field practice than online practice (t=6.21, p<.001). Conclusion: Field practice has been shown to achieve higher academic performance than online practice. Hence, research is needed in order to develop suitable field practice models for the New Normal era in preparation for situations that practice is limited, such as COVID-19 and future outbreaks.

참고자료

· 없음