• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

「劉仁願紀功碑」의 해석과 당조의 백제고토 지배방식 (The Interpretation on the Monument of Liu-renyuan(劉仁願) and the Governing Method on the Old Territory of Baekje(百濟) in T’ang(唐) Dynasty)

28 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.10 최종저작일 2017.07
28P 미리보기
「劉仁願紀功碑」의 해석과 당조의 백제고토 지배방식
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 수선사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 사림 / 61호 / 101 ~ 128페이지
    · 저자명 : 조재우

    초록

    The so-called Monument of Liu-renyuan(劉仁願) is the victory monument which was built around the first year of Linde(麟德) era(664) in order to celebrate and honor Liu-renyuan’s contributions to suppressing Baekje(百濟) revival movement forces after the collapse of Baekje. The Monument of Liu-renyuan can be confirmed only up to Lines 1-21 in the first half of the epigraph in the present, which closely describe Liu-renyuan family’s origin, the pedigree of lineal ancestors, and Liu-renyuan’s career and achievements so that they can be evaluated to have the high value of historical materials.
    However, the part related to the methods to govern the old territory of Baekje in T’ang(唐) Dynasty has been the most noticeable in the academic circle recently in relation to the Monument of Liu-renyuan. That is, the question is related to whether T’ang Dynasty established Duhufu(都護府) in the old territory of Baekje immediately after the collapse of Baekje. In relation to this question, mixed opinions are presented in preceding studies. On the one hand, based upon the epigraph contents in the Monument of Liu-renyuan, an opinion argues that T’ang Dynasty established Duhufu so as to control five Dudufu(都督府). On the other hand, another opinion points out the possibility of exaggerating and beautifying the achievements of Liu-renyuan due to the character of historical materials as a monument to cast doubts on the reliability of historical materials in the Monument of Liu-renyuan. So, the purpose of this study is to discuss the methods to govern the old territory of Baekje in T’ang Dynasty immediately after the collapse of Baekje through the comparison and contrast with literature historical materials on the basis of the synthetic analysis on the Monument of Liu-renyuan.
    First of all, this study synthetically examined the actual status of rubbing copies and reading texts in the Monument of Liu-renyuan since the middle of the 17th century, and so presented correct reading texts, and then compared and contrasted the contents of the epigraph with literature historical materials to try to re-interpret the epigraph. In addition, through examining existing related literature historical records on the basis of these reading and annotated translation works, this study confirmed that T’ang Dynasty had established Duhufu and five Dudufu(s) in Baekje regions to try to implement Jimi(羈縻) policy toward the old territory of Baekje. However, as Baekje restoration movements occurred even though T’ang Dynasty did not dominated the entire regions in the old territory of Baekje completely, Jimi policy planned by T’ang Dynasty had to face its limitations in the process of its implementation. Thus, as Duhufu established by T’ang Dynasty became in fact null and void, the role of garrison troops(鎭守軍) stationed in the old territory of Baekje had been strengthened gradually to function as the substantial mechanism to rule the old territory of Baekje in T’ang Dynasty although this ruling system had been continued since Baekje reconstruction movement forces were repressed completely in the third year of Longshuo(龍朔) era(663) and so Ungjin Dudufu(熊津都督府) was consolidated.

    영어초록

    The so-called Monument of Liu-renyuan(劉仁願) is the victory monument which was built around the first year of Linde(麟德) era(664) in order to celebrate and honor Liu-renyuan’s contributions to suppressing Baekje(百濟) revival movement forces after the collapse of Baekje. The Monument of Liu-renyuan can be confirmed only up to Lines 1-21 in the first half of the epigraph in the present, which closely describe Liu-renyuan family’s origin, the pedigree of lineal ancestors, and Liu-renyuan’s career and achievements so that they can be evaluated to have the high value of historical materials.
    However, the part related to the methods to govern the old territory of Baekje in T’ang(唐) Dynasty has been the most noticeable in the academic circle recently in relation to the Monument of Liu-renyuan. That is, the question is related to whether T’ang Dynasty established Duhufu(都護府) in the old territory of Baekje immediately after the collapse of Baekje. In relation to this question, mixed opinions are presented in preceding studies. On the one hand, based upon the epigraph contents in the Monument of Liu-renyuan, an opinion argues that T’ang Dynasty established Duhufu so as to control five Dudufu(都督府). On the other hand, another opinion points out the possibility of exaggerating and beautifying the achievements of Liu-renyuan due to the character of historical materials as a monument to cast doubts on the reliability of historical materials in the Monument of Liu-renyuan. So, the purpose of this study is to discuss the methods to govern the old territory of Baekje in T’ang Dynasty immediately after the collapse of Baekje through the comparison and contrast with literature historical materials on the basis of the synthetic analysis on the Monument of Liu-renyuan.
    First of all, this study synthetically examined the actual status of rubbing copies and reading texts in the Monument of Liu-renyuan since the middle of the 17th century, and so presented correct reading texts, and then compared and contrasted the contents of the epigraph with literature historical materials to try to re-interpret the epigraph. In addition, through examining existing related literature historical records on the basis of these reading and annotated translation works, this study confirmed that T’ang Dynasty had established Duhufu and five Dudufu(s) in Baekje regions to try to implement Jimi(羈縻) policy toward the old territory of Baekje. However, as Baekje restoration movements occurred even though T’ang Dynasty did not dominated the entire regions in the old territory of Baekje completely, Jimi policy planned by T’ang Dynasty had to face its limitations in the process of its implementation. Thus, as Duhufu established by T’ang Dynasty became in fact null and void, the role of garrison troops(鎭守軍) stationed in the old territory of Baekje had been strengthened gradually to function as the substantial mechanism to rule the old territory of Baekje in T’ang Dynasty although this ruling system had been continued since Baekje reconstruction movement forces were repressed completely in the third year of Longshuo(龍朔) era(663) and so Ungjin Dudufu(熊津都督府) was consolidated.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“사림”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 프레시홍 - 추석
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 20일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
8:45 오후