• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

병자호란 이후(1640~1642년) 쓰시마에 대한 조선의 입체적인 교섭 논리: 1640년 문위행과 이후 파생된 교섭을 중심으로 (The Joseon’s Multi-Layered Response toward Tsushima after the Manchu Invasion of the Joseon in 1636(丙子胡亂))

32 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.28 최종저작일 2021.09
32P 미리보기
병자호란 이후(1640~1642년) 쓰시마에 대한 조선의 입체적인 교섭 논리: 1640년 문위행과 이후 파생된 교섭을 중심으로
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국문화 / 95호 / 73 ~ 104페이지
    · 저자명 : 박정슬

    초록

    After the Manchu Invasion of the Joseon in 1636(丙子胡亂), the Qing began to exercise the pressure the Joseon in three different ways: arranging relations between the Qing and the Japan, sending huge amount of annual tributary payment(歲幣), and mobilizing soldiers and weapons to fight against the Ming.
    Firstly, the Joseon made it very clear that they will never pay the role of an intermediary between the Qing and the Japan helping them to initiate the diplomatic relations, after which they leaked the false information about the Japan to the Qing. The leakage, made of lies, includes that the Japan was not in a suitable environment to have a relationship with the Qing. For example, the Japan being far away from the sea to exchange envoys with, or the Japan being suspicious with likelihood of preparing a war against the Continent, like the Japanese Invasion of the Joseon in 1592(壬辰倭亂).
    The second and third pressures of the Qing were difficult to deal with due to the exhaustion of the Joseon’s resources after the war. Especially annual tributary payment, the Joseon had to seek constant and stable routes to procure goods from overseas because the Qing included items that could only be obtained by importing them. In addition, annual tributary payment and sending troops, which were very burdensome for the Joseon to afford, often ignited various diplomatic problems with the Qing. This made the Joseon gradually realize that they were in an uneasy position to safeguard their interest in the East Asia.
    This difficult situations caused by the Qing affected the negotiation attitude of the Tsushima(對馬) in south. Its intelligence capabilities reached the Northwestern(關西) region of the Joseon, linking the northern situation related to the Qing with negotiations from the south. The Tsushima recognized that the Joseon was in a position under pressures from the Qing, and used it in their favor in the negotiations with Joseon, making opportunities to go in a offensive way.
    In this ‘Northern Barbarian and Southern Wako(北虜南倭)’ situation, the Joseon responded to the Tsushima in two directions. As the Joseon sought a breakthrough for managing the Qing’s demands using the Japan, the Joseon counteracted the aggressive Tsushima, utilizing the Qing’s pressures in their favor.
    The complex responses were revealed by the Joseon’s multi-layered negotiation logics. The Joseon had to establish a logic to resolve economic and military pressures of the Qing through the Japan, ensuring it less explicit that the Joseon was under such pressures from the Qing or that the Joseon obeyed the Qing as a tributary state(朝貢國). The Joseon began it with the logic that ‘Trade with the Ming was inevitably cut off because the Qing made the surrendered the Ming admirals attack the Ga-island(椵島) and territory of Yyodong(遼東), resulting in the Joseon were no longer able to receive the gold and weapons in the exchange of the Ming. So we ask the Tsushima the gold’.
    Moreover, the Joseon completed their negotiation logics not by mentioning annual tributary payment but by adding a lie with plausible cause of requesting the gold necessary for ornaments or medicinal materials to the Tsushima. At the same time, with the diplomatic abilities and strategy, the Joseon managed the Tsushima cleverly when they tried to scrutinize the situations in the Joseon to find out what the Joseon was hiding to them.
    Additionally, due to the affair of forgery of diplomatic documents in the Tushima(柳川一件), negotiation attitude of the Tsushima also changed making the Joseon’s response logic more multi-layered. The Tsushima’s initial attitude of maximizing the Shogunate(將軍)’s interests, expectations, and authority toward the negotiation with the Joseon was more often witnessed. However, the Joseon did not tolerate this either and established a new negotiation logic.

    영어초록

    After the Manchu Invasion of the Joseon in 1636(丙子胡亂), the Qing began to exercise the pressure the Joseon in three different ways: arranging relations between the Qing and the Japan, sending huge amount of annual tributary payment(歲幣), and mobilizing soldiers and weapons to fight against the Ming.
    Firstly, the Joseon made it very clear that they will never pay the role of an intermediary between the Qing and the Japan helping them to initiate the diplomatic relations, after which they leaked the false information about the Japan to the Qing. The leakage, made of lies, includes that the Japan was not in a suitable environment to have a relationship with the Qing. For example, the Japan being far away from the sea to exchange envoys with, or the Japan being suspicious with likelihood of preparing a war against the Continent, like the Japanese Invasion of the Joseon in 1592(壬辰倭亂).
    The second and third pressures of the Qing were difficult to deal with due to the exhaustion of the Joseon’s resources after the war. Especially annual tributary payment, the Joseon had to seek constant and stable routes to procure goods from overseas because the Qing included items that could only be obtained by importing them. In addition, annual tributary payment and sending troops, which were very burdensome for the Joseon to afford, often ignited various diplomatic problems with the Qing. This made the Joseon gradually realize that they were in an uneasy position to safeguard their interest in the East Asia.
    This difficult situations caused by the Qing affected the negotiation attitude of the Tsushima(對馬) in south. Its intelligence capabilities reached the Northwestern(關西) region of the Joseon, linking the northern situation related to the Qing with negotiations from the south. The Tsushima recognized that the Joseon was in a position under pressures from the Qing, and used it in their favor in the negotiations with Joseon, making opportunities to go in a offensive way.
    In this ‘Northern Barbarian and Southern Wako(北虜南倭)’ situation, the Joseon responded to the Tsushima in two directions. As the Joseon sought a breakthrough for managing the Qing’s demands using the Japan, the Joseon counteracted the aggressive Tsushima, utilizing the Qing’s pressures in their favor.
    The complex responses were revealed by the Joseon’s multi-layered negotiation logics. The Joseon had to establish a logic to resolve economic and military pressures of the Qing through the Japan, ensuring it less explicit that the Joseon was under such pressures from the Qing or that the Joseon obeyed the Qing as a tributary state(朝貢國). The Joseon began it with the logic that ‘Trade with the Ming was inevitably cut off because the Qing made the surrendered the Ming admirals attack the Ga-island(椵島) and territory of Yyodong(遼東), resulting in the Joseon were no longer able to receive the gold and weapons in the exchange of the Ming. So we ask the Tsushima the gold’.
    Moreover, the Joseon completed their negotiation logics not by mentioning annual tributary payment but by adding a lie with plausible cause of requesting the gold necessary for ornaments or medicinal materials to the Tsushima. At the same time, with the diplomatic abilities and strategy, the Joseon managed the Tsushima cleverly when they tried to scrutinize the situations in the Joseon to find out what the Joseon was hiding to them.
    Additionally, due to the affair of forgery of diplomatic documents in the Tushima(柳川一件), negotiation attitude of the Tsushima also changed making the Joseon’s response logic more multi-layered. The Tsushima’s initial attitude of maximizing the Shogunate(將軍)’s interests, expectations, and authority toward the negotiation with the Joseon was more often witnessed. However, the Joseon did not tolerate this either and established a new negotiation logic.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“한국문화”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 09월 08일 월요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
9:13 오전