한국의 일본근현대문학 연구 현황과 과제 -2005년과 2012년의 연구 조사 비교- (Studies on Modern and Contemporary Japanese Literature in Korea: Present and Future -A Comparative Review Based on Statistics from 2005 through 2011-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국일어일문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 일어일문학연구 / 83권 / 2호 / 83 ~ 106페이지
· 저자명 : 최재철

초록

2012年に日本文學硏究關聯の登載(登載候補2個を包む)學術誌18種類を調査した結果、2005年から2011年までの7年間、韓國において日本近現代文學に関する硏究論文を執筆した人は493人(日本人など54人を包む)であり、論文の総数は1,614編で、年平均231編(1人平均3.3編)を揭載したことになる。この中で、每年1編以上の論文を執筆した69人が日本近現代文學の研究を主に遂行している。作家別の硏究論文の編數を調べてみると、1位の芥川と2位の漱石関連の論文が特に多く、3位大江、5位春樹等の現代作家に関する論文の增加が著しい。また、4位川端、6位太宰、7位藤村などの硏究は持続的に行われている。硏究對象の日本人作家の総数は184人で、近現代の作家ほとん皆が韓國で硏究されていると言える。主題別に見ると、<社會>關聯の主題が最も多く研究されており、次に<苦惱>と<男女>、そして、<宗敎>、<家族>の順である。素材・方法面においては、<表現>關聯の論文が最も多く、<比較硏究>、<在日作家/日本語作品>、<韓國(人)像>關聯の硏究等の增加勢が顕著である。これは2005年に豫想した通りで、今度の調査において再確認することができた。日本近現代文學關聯の單行本の著述出版は、7年間129册(年平均18册)であり、共著を含み、硏究書は54册で、紹介・鑑賞・入門書は27册、總論・文學史25册、そして日本の硏究書の譯書23册等である。在日作家作品論とキリスト敎文學論等の主題別單行本には、共同硏究を集めた編著(14册)が多い方である。川端と芥川など17人の作家に関する單行本の出版が26册へと增加したのは、各硏究者の活潑な著述と博士學位論文の出版等が包まれているからである。このような調査の統計を参考にして、韓國における日本近現代文學の硏究の方向を展望し、硏究對象の作家や主題、素材、方法面において新しさを追求し、國內の日本硏究の水準を深化させていかなければならない。硏究者の104 日語日文學研究 제83집增加と業績評価による硏究の增加は、學會活動を强化するという点からみると肯定的な側面がある。しかし、單純に實績に拘り、論文を量産する現狀は再考され、質的な評価を優先する合理的な方向を摸索することが必要である。日本文學硏究も對內外の環境の變化に能動的に對處し、適應していかなければならないと思う。人文學の中心である言語・文學には政治・經濟・社會的な側面の葛藤を緩和する效用があり、窮極的に心・精神の理解を志向するという点において、韓日近現代文學の相互硏究が韓日關係を発展させる原動力となることを希望している。これから、日本近現代文學の硏究分野における多樣な個別創意硏究と、共同硏究の将来の實績を期待し、他の學問分野と交流融合する学際的な硏究や比較硏究の活性化、そして、外國の硏究者・學會との學術交流協力を持續的に推進する必要がある。

영어초록

Currently, sixteen peer-review journals related to Japanese literature make it to the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) list and two journals are under consideration. A statistical study conducted in 2012 shows that 493 Korean authors including 54 Japanese ones published 1,614 journal articles on modern and contemporary Japanese literature during the years of 2005-11. 231 journal articles were annually published, which tells each author on average published 3.3 articles.
It is notable that 69 authors annually published more than one article in the area of modern/contemporary Japanese literature.
The journal articles published in Korea mostly deal with modern/contemporary Japanese writers, which counts 184 in total. Akutagawa is studied the most and Sōseki is the next in rank. Ōe is ranked third and Haruki is fifth, which shows the trend that studies on contemporary writers are remarkably increasing. Kawabata is also ranked fourth, Dazai and Tōson have been stably studied, each ranked sixth and seventh among the most-studied writers. As a top subject matter, scholars focus on "society." "Anguish," "relationship between man and woman," "religion," and "family" have been treated in order. Concerning the methodologies/approaches,studies have been done with the use of "expression." "Comparative study,""Korean-Japanese literature/writers," "Images of Korea(n)" have considerably increased as predicted in the 2005 review.
129 books on modern/contemporary Japanese literature were published in Korea and this means eighteen books were published annually over the past seven years.
54 books including co-authored ones are strongly research-oriented; 27 books are characteristic of introductions/responses to modern/contemporary Japanese literature;25 books are categorized into the overview/literary history; 23 books are translated works from research books by Japanese scholars; 14 edited books consist of contributions from scholars, focusing on mostly Korean-Japanese literature and Christian literature. 26 books about seventeen writers including Kawabata and Akutagawa were published because scholars were actively involved in writing books and dissertations were also made into books.
This statistical study helps us not only establish studies and researches on modern/contemporary Japanese literature in Korea, but also further them by envisioning their direction as well as by seeking new subjects regarding writers/themes/methodologies, etc. It is positive to observe increasing number of researchers and researches promote various societies and associations. More importantly, however, they should reconsider how to evaluate works in order to encourage scholars to produce high-quality research.
Studies on Japanese literature should be adapted to the changes of environments not to mention coping with them. Considering humanities including the Japanese literature aim at understanding the human kind, they are effective in lessening conflicts over politics, economy, culture and society among nations. I hope that mutual studies on modern/contemporary Korean/Japanese literature will help develop the relation between Korea and Japan.
I expect more of original researches either individually, or collaboratively in the area of modern/contemporary Japanese literature. It is necessary to encourage interdisciplinary and comparative studies as well as to continue establishing academic ties with foreign scholars and associations.

참고자료

· 없음