초등영재학생의 인지양식 그룹별 골드버그 장치에 대한 문제해결전략

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국영재학회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 영재교육연구 / 25권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 권용태, 강호감

목차

I. 서 론
II. 연구내용 및 방법
III. 결과 및 논의
IV. 결론 및 제언
참 고 문 헌

한국어 초록

본 연구의 목적은 초등영재학생의 장의존적-장독립적 인지양식에 따른 골드버그 장치 과제에
대한 문제 해결 전략을 알아보는 것이다. 연구 대상은 화성시 P초등학교의 영재학급 학생 16명이
며, 사전에 인지양식 검사를 실시하여 학생들을 장의존적 그룹, 약한 장의존적 그룹, 중간적
그룹, 약한 장독립적 그룹, 장독립적 그룹의 5개 그룹으로 편성하였다. 골드버그 장치의 과제는
구슬을 시작 지점에서 가장 늦게 목표지점에 도달하도록 1 m3의 앵글구조틀 내부에 장치

영어 초록

The purpose of this study was to explore the problem solving strategy for Goldberg machine
tasks of the gifted students in elementary science depending on the cognitive style(tendency
to field-dependent and field independent). It was aimed to provide suggestions for the features
and differences of the problem solving strategies of the gifted students in elementary science
according to their cognitive styles. A total of 16 students, from the gifted class of P elementary
school in Hwaseong were sampled for the research, cognitive styles Test was conducted to
divide the students in teams, and the teams were classified according to cognitive style
tendencies to five groups of field-dependent group, weak field-dependent group, mixed group,
weak field-independent group and field-independent group. The Goldberg device task given
was to make a Goldberg device within the angle framework of (Figure) 1, for a bead to start
from the starting point and to reach the final point the last. The results are as follows: First,
regarding the plan for producing the device, the stronger the field-independent tendency, they
established more specific strategy-reflected plan; the stronger the field-dependent tendency,
they established less specific strategy-reflected plan. Second, all cognitive style groups took
a limited period of time into consideration, to fabricate the devices for the ball to arrive the
last using a fine adjustment rather than many devices. Third, the field-independent group
used a lot of logical reasoning; the field-dependent group used a lot of intuitive thinking.
Fourth, the field independent group properly utilized strategies such as cooperation and role
allocation; the field-dependent group tried to solve the task personally rather than
cooperatively with poor role allocation. Fifth, the intermediate mixed group solved the problem
better than the inclined groups such as field-dependent or field-independent groups.

참고 자료

없음