현실주의와 권력전이이론 비교
- 최초 등록일
- 2021.04.25
- 최종 저작일
- 2018.05
- 7페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 1,500원
소개글
"현실주의와 권력전이이론 비교"에 대한 내용입니다.
목차
I. Introduction
II. Power Transition Theory and Offensive Realism
III. Power is an Important Key
IV. Hierarchy and Anarchy
V. Socialization and Domination
VI. Conclusion
VII. Referenced Works
본문내용
The world is consisted of individual people, different states and the international system. With these components, there is complexity to explain phenomena going on through the globe. Nevertheless, as mankind has been through eras, they have developed theories to explain phenomena. It is important to have some theories to explain phenomena. With reasonable theories, we can explain things going around the world in more sophisticated ways. Since many scholars have worked for explanations, it is not abnormal that there are various theories to explain international relations. There are many theories, and representatives are realism, liberalism, and constructivism. There would be a lot to talk about, when comparing those three major theories. However, this paper would compare two theories, rather than liberalism and constructivism. The main comparison would be between offensive realism and power transition theory. Roughly, both theories are a bit based on realism.
참고 자료
Kim, Y. J. (2015) The Evolution of Power Transition Theory: A Critical Review. Journal of International Politics, 20(1), 177-209.
Ko, B. J. (2015) Balance of Military Power in East Asia and Peace on the Korean Peninsula. Jeju Peace Institute, 6, 6-22.
Lee, C. G. (2009) Hyunsilchuyi Gukjaejungchihak (Realism in Science of International Politics). Paju: Nanamchulpan
Lee, J. W. (2015) Studying Causes of Conflicts between China and Japan: Based on A.F.K. Organski’s Power Transition Theory. Seoul: School of Public Policy, Korea University.
Park, S. H. (2014) Introduction to International Relation, Theories of Realism: Classical Realism <Power Transitions>. Seoul: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
Seol, I. H. and Lee, T. S. (2012) Mearsheimer’s Offensive Realism and North East Asian Regional Order in the 21st Century: The Debates between Defensive and Offensive Realism and the Reexamination of Mearsheimer’s Offensive Realism. Research on Public Dispute, 10(2), 123-156.