Judgments of Similarity & Difference between Paintings
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국조형교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 조형교육 / 9권
ㆍ저자명 : Gerald C. Cupchik, Andrew S. Winston, Rechel S. Herz
ㆍ저자명 : Gerald C. Cupchik, Andrew S. Winston, Rechel S. Herz
목차
AbstractMethod
Results
Discussion
Note
References
한국어 초록
This study examined judgments of similarity and difference between pairs of paintings. The stimull included 16 groups of paintings, each group composed of an anchor and hour comparison paintings that were similar to and/or different from the anchor in subject matter and style. Forty-eight subjects, including an equal number of na?ve an experienced male and female undergraduates, judged whether 64 pairs of paintings were “similar” or “different.” In within-subjects design, viewers were instructed to judge subject matter or style from either subjective emotional or objective analytical test. Results showed that difference was judged more accurately. More quickly, and with greater certainty than similarity, and that subject matter was judged more easily than style.Judgments of differing subject matter interfered with the perception of similar style, particularly when the viewer adopted an objective set. Conversely, differing style interfered with judgments of similar subject matter, particularly when the viewer adopted an emotional set. Bender differences in modes of discerning style were also found. The overall results are interpreted in terms of a contrast between holistic processes that unify paiterans and analytioal processes which focus on disorimination features.
영어 초록
This study examined judgments of similarity and difference between pairs of paintings. The stimull included 16 groups of paintings, each group composed of an anchor and hour comparison paintings that were similar to and/or different from the anchor in subject matter and style. Forty-eight subjects, including an equal number of na?ve an experienced male and female undergraduates, judged whether 64 pairs of paintings were “similar” or “different.” In within-subjects design, viewers were instructed to judge subject matter or style from either subjective emotional or objective analytical test. Results showed that difference was judged more accurately. More quickly, and with greater certainty than similarity, and that subject matter was judged more easily than style. Judgments of differing subject matter interfered with the perception of similar style, particularly when the viewer adopted an objective set. Conversely, differing style interfered with judgments of similar subject matter, particularly when the viewer adopted an emotional set. Bender differences in modes of discerning style were also found. The overall results are interpreted in terms of a contrast between holistic processes that unify paiterans and analytioal processes which focus on disorimination features.참고 자료
없음태그
"조형교육"의 다른 논문
- (美國 미술관교육세미나 참가記) “미술관 교육이란?”3페이지
- Art History and the Museum in the Schools12페이지
- A Descriptive Study of the Art Museum Relative to Schoo..11페이지
- 關聯學會 學術發表-要約中繼室7페이지
- “도가사상과” 선불교가 한국 미술에 끼친 영향3페이지