The analytical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis
- 최초 등록일
- 2010.08.24
- 최종 저작일
- 2008.11
- 13페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 7,000원
소개글
Critical Period Hypothesis 에 관한 분석 및 고찰 입니다. Suggestions for learners and teachers 에 관한 얘기고, 제가 유학 당시, 석사 1년차때 쓴 final report 입니다
목차
없음
본문내용
Does Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) apply in the case of learning a second language?’ Lightbown and Spada (1999) suggested that there is a “specific and limited time period for language acquisition.” Lenneberg (1967) considered that there is a significant difference between younger learners and older learners in their abilities to attain native-like proficiency “automatically from mere exposure to a given language”
...............................................................................
Their study found that the age of arrival was a momentous factor in successfully acquiring English. It also showed that those people who arrived in the United States at earlier ages of their lives performed better on the test in English. The learners studying English before the age of 15, “especially before the age of 10,” indicated homogeneity of score ranges.
참고 자료
Antonio Reyes-Rodríguez. Memory’s Modus Operandi And Input Processing: A Theoretical Model Retrieved Nov. 13, 2007 http://www.mediazionionline.it/articoli/reyes-rodriguez.html
Asher, J.,& Price, B.(1967), The learning strategy of total physical response: Some age differences. Child Development, 38, 1219-1227
Bialystok, E. 1997: The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116-137.
Bialystok & Hakuta, 1999: Confounded age; Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 162-181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
