Survey Instrument for Related to the Use of Outcome Measures in Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 국제물리치료학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research / 14권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : Jaehyun Lim, Sunghwan Park, Chibok Park, Byeonggeun Kim
ㆍ저자명 : Jaehyun Lim, Sunghwan Park, Chibok Park, Byeonggeun Kim
목차
INTRODUCTIONSUBJECTS AND METHODS
Design
Search methods
Selection of studies
Data extraction
Quality assessment
RESULTS
Search results
Characteristics of the studies
OMs attributes measured
Quality assessment
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
영어 초록
Background: Outcome measures (OMs) are essential components of evidence- based practice as they help in implementing interventions and assessing changes in a patient's status before and after treatment. However, many therapists do not utilize OMs in their practice, and research on the factors that influence physical therapists' decisions regarding the use of OMs primarily consists of quantitative or survey-based studies. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to select research studies on OMs use among physical therapists through a systematic review, identify questionnaire characteristics, and assess the quality of items collection and research. Design: A systematic review. Methods: This study systematically collected survey studies on the use of OMs from five databases (KMBase, RISS, KCI, Pubmed, and Cochrane) based on the criteria of PRISMA's systematic review flowchart. The quality of the studies was assessed using the AXIS Tool. Results: A total of eight studies were selected. In most of the studies, the questionnaires were developed internally, validated through preliminary research, and reliability testing was not conducted. The items used within OMs were divided into 10 categories, with the highest frequency of questions centering around how to use OMs, and the lowest frequency regarding work environment and reasons. All eight studies were determined to be of good quality. Conclusion: The collected OMs questionnaires revealed variations in the item frequency. Future qualitative research and participant feedback are needed to develop a consistent questionnaire and validate its validity and reliability.참고 자료
없음"Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research"의 다른 논문
- Effect of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and Pain Neu..7페이지
- Comparison of Thigh Muscle Activity during Squat on Sta..6페이지
- Comparison of Knee Joint Loads during Floor Sit-to-Stan..9페이지
- Effects of Reaching to Sit-Up Training on Trunk Muscle ..9페이지
- Effects of ErigoPro Training on the Trunk Alignment and..8페이지